1,859 words
Norman Bates has been created, a mentally deranged man dressing up as mother. There are many like Robert Bloch’s character; some like Liam Suleman/Lucy Edwards, William/Gillian Jaggs, and Kayleigh-Louise Woods/Kyle Lockwood have all murdered women exactly like the character; others behave in other violent and depraved ways, like Miguel/Michelle Martinez, Kim Leverton, and Gary/Carys Cooper, who have all sexually assaulted children; still others are non-violent, but equally psychologically damaged. Let us be honest, all who identify themselves as “trans,” “genderqueer,” “LGBT,” “gender fluid,” “gender non-binary,” and all the rest of the newspeak terms that have emerged over the past fifty years, have serious psychological problems. A database has been compiled of crimes by “trans” persons, which can be accessed by clicking this link. One notes that they are overwhelmingly born white and male. But how did all this come about, and how can we fix an ever-growing problem?
The problem is, after all, growing. One only has to look at the state of many males in any pub or high street and compare them to the stock from a mere twenty years ago to realize that something has radically altered. What has altered is, of course, women and, in turn, men’s relationship to them. While it is true that middle-class women had been robbed of their natural role in society, which I have talked about before in my Nature video series, which led to female-empowerment movements in the nineteenth century, the 1960s reaction was extreme and carried out against a society that needed tweaking rather than hitting with a hammer. Yet just as women lost their social status and aspect of the divine under Judeo-Christianity, it was Jewish women like Betty Friedan and Susan Sontag who pushed an agenda that has again had an adverse effect on white European societies, aided and abetted by powerful Jewish male-dominated money power and half-insane white Gentile women brainwashed in the seats of “higher learning” to hate their own men.
In Britain, feminism can be pretty-much summed up in one woman: Australian harpy Germaine Greer, whose book The Female Eunuch was a bestseller and attacked both men and the family. Greer has no children, is often wheeled out as a panelist on various BBC talk shows, and expressed her daddy issues in her autobiographical work, Daddy, We Hardly Knew You. She has also done the fashionable thing among feminists of claiming to have been raped in early adulthood in retrospect many years after the event, while simultaneously pushing the paedophilic abuse of adolescent boys by women in The Boy/The Beautiful Boy. She has claimed repeatedly that all problems come from “empowering the penis,” “testosterone,” and “male insecurity.” Her solution, then, has been to make them more insecure to the point where they loathe themselves, their testosterone, and their penises right from infancy via the school indoctrination system, where the two post-Christian generations of schoolchildren have learnt that the source of original sin is no longer Eve, but Adam.
What goes around comes around. After fifty years of the nastiest unstable bitches imaginable persecuting men for being men, resulting in psychologically damaging young boys into trying to become girls, feminists are now getting a taste of their own medicine from the monsters they created. Feminism has helped change the law into a hierarchy of protected groups, and trannies are now on top of the pile, and any logical criticism of them is a hatecrime. Well done. Germaine Greer tried to close the lid of Pandora’s box, but was undone by her own malice. She argued that men could never become women, but that meant they could never be free of original sin. Even the Roman Catholic Church had its penances to absolve one of sin. Yet men who rid themselves of the “evils” of testosterone and the penis were not to be absolved. It exposed her as the malicious witch she has always been. There was a reason such women were once put in attics or asylums.
On the British TV program This Morning (below), militant feminist Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (that’s a lot of hyphens) gets browbeaten into accepting the pseudo-science that men who have been through a process of cosmetic surgery are real women. “Feminism is under threat!” she declares. Yes, it is, because feminism relies on there being men for its existence. Its whole religious doctrine is based on the male as Satan. If Satan does not exist, then the wellspring of evil does not exist and so neither can good, for as St. Augustine said, how can one know what is good without comparison to evil? Equally, how can the good woman exist without the evil man? And therefore, how can feminism exist without the fight against the evil enemy? This is the real reason for the feminists’ hatred of transsexuals – and one notices that they never so much as mention the reverse, of female-to-male “transition.” Where is the outcry that this devalues manhood? No, this has nothing to do with a fight against pseudo-science, because feminism has lived off the pseudo-sciences of psychology and sociology for a long time now.
One notes how much more prevalent male-to-female “transition” is compared to the reverse. It shows on whom societal pressure and discrimination is placed. And the great irony in the video above is that the feminist is more masculine in both looks and attitude than the tranny. “India” Willoughby is placid, passive, and manipulates emotions of empathy, whereas Kellie Hyphen-Hyphen is blunt, assertive, and aggressive. Kellie has become the artificial man almost as much as India has become the artificial woman. Adam and Eve trade places in the new form of Judeo-Christianity, but the new Eve wins out because morality is still predicated on the Christ figure, where the greatest perceived sufferer is the most venerated. Just as Christ was conceived as a second Adam to redeem the first, so the tranny is to redeem the male. This is ultimately how Kellie Hyphen-Hyphen became a secular demon in the debate, because she used scientific facts against the tranny-Christ in a society where belief and “the feels” trump science and reason.
The whole cult of transsexuality really took off with the pseudo-science of sexology, “pioneered” by Jews like Magnus Hirschfeld and Harry Benjamin, and “academics” suffering from sexual perversions like Havelock Ellis, who could only get aroused by watching women urinating. Sexology, like sociology and psychoanalysis, was a way of seeing what made people and social interactions tick in order to break them down. One can see how feminism would interlock into these disciplines and become a perfect vehicle for social destruction. Hirschfeld ticked every SJW box imaginable with being a Jewish homosexual Trotskyite, and coined the words “racism” and “transvestite,” while Benjamin coined the word “transsexualism,” from which all derivatives hail. There have been many efforts to “prove” as scientific fact the fervent belief of being “trapped in the wrong body,” and often by dishonest means. At the same time, Leftist doublethink means this ignores the other pseudo-scientific premise that we are all the products of socialization.
To prove the point of pseudo-science presented as science, news broke yesterday of an academic hoax that played on the cult of SJW victimology. The “Sokal Squared” hoax was carried out by James A. Lyndsay, Helen Pluckrose, and Peter Boghossian, three genuine academics who were tired of what they call “grievance studies.” They wrote twenty parodies of postmodern academic papers, seven of which were accepted and four already published online before they admitted the hoax. The articles included “Going In Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria, Transhysteria, and Transphobia Through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use,” which was published in Sexuality and Culture; “Human reactions to rape culture and queer performativity at urban dog parks in Portland, Oregon,” which appeared in Gender, Place & Culture; and “Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism” (a feminist parody of a chapter of Mein Kampf), which was accepted by Affilia.
Yet the feminist-transsexual antagonism has implications for us on the Radical Right. Too often do those of the Alt Right feel obliged to pick a side. So hated are feminists (and understandably so) that any perceived enemy of feminism is invited into the Alt Light and even the Alt Right itself. This has facilitated the inclusion of MGTOW – a mirror image of feminism for men, White Shariah, Jewish homosexuals with black boyfriends, and trannies. Trannies Blaire White and Zuzanna Mroz have been brought into the Alt Light by (((Ben Shapiro))) and (((Rebel Media))), respectively; but worse is Claire Rae Randall, whom many of my Facebook friends seem to think is perfectly sane and who happily spouts the National Socialist view of history to them, but who was interviewed on Red Ice and who just wants the Alt Right to accept transgender theory as real science.
I do not wish to be misunderstood here; there are indeed unfortunate individuals who are born intersex, where anomalies from birth occur through genetic defects or problems during pregnancy and are born with both sexual characteristics to a greater or smaller degree. We are not dealing with those people here. The people we are dealing with are those who believe they have been born into the wrong body, which they call “gender dysphoria” because it sounds nice and sciency. Yet one notices they always want to mutilate the body rather than treat the brain, which is characteristic of mental illness. Part of their mental disorder involves attempting to normalize it to others, for like all diseases, its aim is to spread. This is why such people cannot be integrated into the movement. A movement is founded on principles, and the Radical Right’s principles are founded on Natural Law. What so-called transsexuals do is to play with language to demand their inclusion. They wish to change the parameters of what it means to be a traditionalist.
They might as well use the Leftist cry of, “Hey, it’s 2018!” And as I have mentioned before, their perversion becomes their hobby; everything in life revolves around transsexuality. Take a look at the titles of Blaire White’s videos and you will see what I mean, titles like “Asking Strangers Which Of Us Is Trans,” “Psychic Tells Me I’m Pregnant (But I’m Trans . . .),” “Is My Boyfriend Gay?”, and “I Try to Live as a Man for the Day,” the last one with no sense of irony. If one accepts trannies or MGTOW or feminists and so on, it will spell the end of the movement, because it will just become a mirror image of the Left and become as big a basket case under its own contradictions. One cannot solve the problem by bringing it under one’s roof; like all diseases, it has to be isolated until it dies off. As little as twenty years ago, the problem in society as a whole was marginal. Through inclusion and tolerance, it has become an epidemic. Let us learn from this.
This article originally appeared at the Mjolnir Magazine Website. Be sure to check out Mjolnir‘s YouTube channel, Mjolnir at the Movies, which features film commentary from a Right-wing pagan perspective.
20 Comments
I remember growing up hearing about the ‘gay agenda’ and thinking (with lots of input from my vehemently man-hating mother) “oh, they are jst being ignorant, they jst want to be accepted, they are normal in every other regard, there is no agenda, that’s just a (((conspiracy theory)))!”
Yet, here I am 15 years later, realizing that everything that was said about the gay agenda is horrifyingly true. It wasn’t enough for homos to simply be tolerated, now organized homosexuality is pushing the most perverted garbage on the planet. This tranny-pedo perversion is sick and must be eradicated from white societies. We must save our men from this mind virus.
Transexualism scares the hell outta me. Yes, I am transphobic- there is good reason to be; It’s a pyschological brain worm that spreads and destroys. These “people” use social media to try and brainwash children too. They’ve been doing it on tumblr for years now.
It’s truly shocking how quickly the hysteria has spread and now transexuals are placed at the top of the elite hierarchy of victimhood when they are one the worst victimizers.
Normalizing trans on the identitarian right is simply too outrageous and disgusting.
The jews have been pushing transgenderism on whites since the 1950s with such movies as “Some Like It Hot,” in which men dress as women, and “Calamity Jane,” in which you have a woman dressing like a man, and a man dressing like a woman.
Don’t forget Moe, Larry, & Curly dressing up, from time to time back in the 30’s and 40’s – as women. Then again, Larry often did look hawt in a woman’s dress and wig….
All three of them were jews, so it came naturally to them. Lets not forget Milton Berle (another jew) that liked to dress up as a women.
The input parameter dial for artificial selection in the West is stuck on ‘freakshow’ and it shows.
Some useful points made here. But I’m not sure I agree with this:
“Yet one notices they always want to mutilate the body rather than treat the brain, which is characteristic of mental illness. ”
so the idea is that if someone is nuts, you can tell, because they’ll do anything but change their mental condition? I would think that someone who, after being perhaps dealt a bad hand, has achieved some level of mature self-acceptance (see G. Johnson’s recent essay on “blaming your parents”), while not wanting anyone else to undergo such trauma, would feel pretty satisfied with themselves and would not want to effectively become “someone else,” however “better” that mental condition would be. “You’ll be happier” is not a reason to take the blue pill. Of course, in such a case, one doubts they would take the surgical route either.
Which is why I actually rather like the suggestion, in the blog article you link to, that it makes more sense to find some kind of role for these folks in our society. Alain Danielou in various places alludes to the way the ancient Hindu social theorists found caste roles for all kinds of “intermediate types” and contrasts this with the Judaic obsession with ruthlessly enforcing artificial dualities. We don’t follow their crazy rules about no cheeseburgers, no combined fabrics and no seed hybridization, so why follow them in this? Ancient cultures found roles for them in the priests, for example, and Camille Paglia would certainly insist on their contributions to Western aesthetic perception (another area the Jew lags behind, hmmm).
And speaking of which, these things have been going on a long time, and even Leviticus finds space to condemn transvestism (probably to avoid assimilation to those pagan religions), so I’m not sure what your point is in observing:
“Hirschfeld ticked every SJW box imaginable with being a Jewish homosexual Trotskyite, and coined the words “racism” and “transvestite,” while Benjamin coined the word “transsexualism,” from which all derivatives hail.”
Surely not Foucault’s nonsense about “inventing” these things in the 19th century? So he coined the term, good for him. Think of how much easier he made it for you to write your essay!
So, how is it that Jews nowadays champion what you seem to think is wholly negative only within the jew-originated view of humanity?
Excellent question! As I point out in the title essay of The Homo & The Negro (Counter-Currents, 2012; 2nd, embiggened edition, 2017), the Jew seeks to dominate both sides of any discussion, thereby always winning. (See any political discussion on cable). They lead both the Left (duh!) and the Right (through Christianity, at first, now more openly through the NeoCons).
The Right of course promotes extermination of the homo; the Left originally promoted promiscuity and hedonism, but when AIDS made this impractical, pivoted to a modified version of the Right’s “family values” — contrary to all historical evidence, the gays always wanted to marry and raise children!
In both cases, society loses the important contributions of the homo to culture and statecraft, (which explains the stateless, artless society of the Jews). Compare the lifestyle of a San Francisco graphic designer to Socrates or Michelangelo. And how convenient: the Jews stands ready to take over the role of the elite.
All this is conveniently illustrated here: https://s14-eu5.startpage.com/wikioimage/e4a306a9eb498d5648e8899c155a1bbb.jpg
“[…] Judaic obsession with ruthlessly enforcing artificial dualities. […]”
Vehemently disagree. Highly dualistic thinking is an Hellenic trait of mind (and was described as such already in antiquity), not a Jewish one. You also – imho – misread Leviticus, whose main themes, among others, are discernment and rightful separation. Nothing dualistic there. Also remember Evola, who posited that Solar-Aryan metaphysics and anthropology were big on clear demarcations between social spheres and human types, with an abhorrence of every type of mixture and ambiguity.
Well, in the discussion above Kellie Hyphen-Hyphen is the “right-winger”, because she’s the biological realist and actually making sense in many points. I see rather a few feminists than trannies leaning to the right in certain ways, in Germany f.e. Alice Schwarzer speaking out against Islam and migrant rape. But overall, they are remaining exceptions.
Also, I find it telling in that discussion how one can immediately spot who’s the woman and who’s the trans.
Which is it now, are Jews gender-benders (Yorkshire) or are they “ruthlessly enforcing artificial dualities” (O’Meara)?
I’m sorry, but you yourself are very much stuck within the JudeoChristian paradigm (and yes, I know very well that this comment if approved will offend you, but such is life). Fixed binary gender is a 100% Hebrew invention. If we are to honestly argue either for moving past Christian weltanschauung and/or to going back to “natural” Aryanism, then we cannot pick and choose – what you argue for belongs to JudeoChristian conditioning that ought be abandoned.
James O’Meara post bellow is also quite excellent.
What is your source for this statement?
I fear that on this particular issue “alt lite” is unwittingly more aryan than you, as it is the aryan way to find the place for the periphery… Attitude espoused in this article would of course be alien and incomprehensible to, say, your viking ancestors.
Solid article.
It’s funny on the other hand how many people need to first find out if something is Jewish or not in order to decide if they are or aren’t in favour of it.
Anyone capable of accepting transgenderism (with the whole implication of it being a reductionist principle that levels whole personhood to real or imagined sexual confusion in ways similar to how gayness treats homosexuality, but more absurd) on the grounds of it being opposed within the Jewish culture is in deep trouble. I get antisemitism, I really do, but this is taking it to comical levels of autism.
If you think your idealized pagan ancestors would tolerate a guy who one day decides to wear a dress and makeup because he “feels that way”, claims that everything in the world revolves around this and demands to go to the loo with their daughters, that’s your problem.
What you’ve smugly making fun of is basically people trying to think with their own heads. They are recognizing that the categories of alien culture have been imposed on their thinking, and are trying to break said categories.
Of course, that is the hard road to travel, most people will happily opt for easy conformism.
They would’ve been feared and respected on account of their numinousness, obviously.
Is this answer Aryan enough?
Solid article, little more to add. Neither modern feminism or gender ideology must be permitted to hold any legitimacy in the “movement,” but of the two, those who celebrate the “empowerment” of the uncorrupted female will forever be more compatible with the radical right than the Gender Marxists, these poisoners of male minds. One may be the result of the other but when a new form of feminism is created that does not seek to replace men yet only celebrate and defend what it means to be a natural woman, there is no reason for such a movement not to be included in the radical right if so desired.
I collect the DC animated movies, but the jews have made one recently, that is so disgusting, that I felt cheated when I rented it at RedBox. This animated movie is called “The Ray,” it a homoerotic, social-justice-warrior abomination! Don’t let your kids watch it!
A good beginning, with some insights, but deficient factually. As anyone who pays attention to the feminist sphere knows, the majority of sex changers these days are female-to-male, often adolescents. The writer seems totally oblivious to this. This isn’t just a statistical blip; it’s a major trend, and a major issue among feminists, who have created all sorts of crazy theories for why it exists (google “ROGD”).
Putting aside cases of intersex/DSDs (which probably also have skyrocketed in recent years, but no stats) this phenomenon likely has an etiology in regressive-feminist propaganda. Typically these youngsters are single children of single mothers, and they have received the full syllabus about how being female is bad, is inferior, is an oppressed condition. They’re told men control everything and men are powerful and men are dangerous because they all want to rape you!.
Who would want to be female, after years of hearing this? If you’re a 13-year-old gamer girl who’s always online, and you’re softheaded enough to have swallowed this feminist anti-female propaganda (disguised as anti-male rant), you’re going to seek a way out. Become a guy—yeah! Take T, have a ripped body and a six-pack like this!
The trend upsets old butch lesbians because they imagine a whole generation of baby butches is being lost. This is unlikely: a lot of these young “trans guys” are repelled by the spectre of lesbianism, and in fact are mainly attracted to males. They want to be gay guys!
Anyway, all this dovetails very nicely into the author’s insights about feminism. He’d find it much more fertile ground to explore than his cliché picture of male crossdressers pretending to be transsexual.