Counter-Currents
65 words
Just as there are laws like those of thermodynamics that explain the physical world there is a law that explains the human world. It is:
The greater a place’s percentage of white people the better its quality of life. The better a place’s quality of life the more it will attract non-white people. If this is permitted, a place’s quality of life will diminish.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
8 comments
Succinct and generally true. One might argue that Japan typically rates higher on quality of life indices than – say – the Ukraine, but the countries rating higher on most quality of life rankings are conspicuously white. It’s also true that Japan maintains strict immigration controls and values its own cultural homogeneity.
.
Partly true, but it misses the role of treachery. How come rural white women abandon their communities and move to big cosmopolitan cities.
>Partly true, but it misses the role of treachery. How come rural white women abandon their communities and move to big cosmopolitan cities.<
Probably because treacherous White male elites deindustrialized the country for profit and there are no jobs in their hometowns.
Keep trying, though. Eventually something is bound to stick.
“The greater a place’s percentage of white people the better its quality of life.”
One could compare a Russian town of, say, 5,000 people (which was 100% white) with an Arizona city of 100,000 that was only 70% white and find that the “quality of life” in the less-white place was superior – if by that we mean an abundance of job and housing opportunities, availability of goods, access to high education and recreational facilities, and so forth.
So what is actually necessary?
1 – A large enough population of whites so that there is a sufficient number of high-IQ individuals to boost the overall level of technology to the point where the quality of life offsets the lower-achievement rate of any given place’s generally much larger proportion of lower-IQ whites and/or the presence of any low-IQ negroes and mestizos. So “Hocking’s Law” only begins to achieve some validity once certain population thresholds have been reached. But short of that, then some places that are “less white” could actually achieve and maintain a higher “quality of life”, provided there is also a sufficient level of whites from which to produce higher-IQ individuals. It is this last factor that is keeping America and Europe afloat, but, like a lifeboat at sea filled with too many shipwreck survivors, it is in danger of going under.
2 – Russia under the banner of the USSR was mostly white, as much if not more so than the USA during that same period. Yet the “quality of life” was not the same as the latter, but demonstrably inferior. How could that be, if “Hocking’s Law” was valid? That’s because being “white” alone is insufficient to the equation, if one leaves out the socio-economic factor of how an industrial society is run. And let’s face it: whites build industrial societies, having left their agrarian days far behind, lost in the depths of the Middle Ages. As such, two societies, both similarly white, were vastly different in results when it came to “quality of life”. So there must not only be a preponderance of whites in any given society for a “better quality of life”, but also an economic engine in place that can produce it.
3 – Thirdly, it is a fact that some European countries, despite being “all white”, never amounted to anything – be it economically, culturally, militarily, or philosophically. On the other hand, some non-white countries ended up surpassing them, most notably Japan. True, most of the non-white world did not, but it does bolster the point that having a larger number of whites in any given place does not always amount to the best outcome of life. So for “Hocking’s Law” to be valid, it must:
A – Indicate a threshold of whites which must first be reached in order to achieve a fully-functioning industrial society.
B – Indicate a certain percentage of high-IQ (130 and above) individuals in that society in order to create the science and technology in order to maintain it.
C – Indicate the best socio-economic foundations by which the greatest good for the greatest number can be achieved.
Without these mileposts, even a white society would languish in mediocrity. Knowing this, and knowing their ambitions, a non-white country like China, spreading both its economic and social tentacles even into Africa, might one day conceivably surpass the steadily browning nations of Europe and North America. And should that happen, “Hocking’s Law” will not save us.
In the Russian town of 5,000, your child, boy or girl, aged seven and up can walk from one area to another without fear of molestation.
There is probably no city in America where that can happen, or where the parents would not consider it as a probability.
Also in the Russian town, your child will go to school with the same class for eight years. Your child will make some life time friends.
In America… your child will enter a new class every year, making no friends whatsoever.
The Russian town your using as comparison is a town recovering from the ravages of 70 years of Jewish Bolshevism. There will always be examples that defy Hocking’s law, but they will be largely temporary and artificially imposed.
“it is a fact that some European countries, despite being “all white””
No it is isn’t. There isn’t a single all-White European country that I wouldn’t rather live in than in any East Asian society, including Japan.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment