Counter-Currents
2,380 words
The True Right has always believed in strong leadership and the ability, as Thomas Carlyle wrote, of ‘great men’ to shape history. In his collection of lectures On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History, Carlyle identifies six types of hero: the Hero as Divinity, as Prophet, as Poet, as Priest, as Man of Letters and as King. This is not limited to the Right, for the Left also has its heroes: its revolutionaries and men of theory.
What we have seen since the 1960s is a new breed of hero that has emerged, firstly on the Left, but now increasingly on the Right: the Hero as Activist. The activist’s name on everyone’s lips at the moment, especially since his recent arrest and imprisonment, is Tommy Robinson. But is he a hero, and will he shape history?
As you will no doubt have realized from the photo above, I do not think he is a hero for our times. In fact, I do not think he is in control of much of what he says. From the very beginning, Robinson has had a dubious relationship with organised Jewry in Britain and this has meant toeing the line of “diversity and inclusion” (see picture above). While his identification of Islam as a problem and direct confrontation of Muslims has been admirable and shows real bravery, divorcing the problem from the subject of race has not just been deliberate, but a conscious dishonest and political choice to align himself with Jewish interests.
The English Defence League, after all, was formed in the image of the Jewish Defence League, a terrorist group that aligned itself to militant Negro groups in America. From the very beginning, despite doing good work in exposing Muslim paedophile gangs, it also promoted multi-racialism and attacked genuine nationalists in Britain who had been exposing the same as “racists”. The EDL under Robinson had various groups within it, including a Jewish section and an LGBT one. In other words, the EDL promoted the same agenda as the government. This is not to say there were not any good people in the EDL. There certainly were, but they were coerced into toeing the PC line, with Robinson being convicted of headbutting someone he referred to as a “neo-Nazi” in 2011.
Indeed, when Robinson left the EDL in 2013, he cited “extremism” as being the reason and suddenly started working with the Leftist/Muslim think tank Quilliam and appearing on the BBC, no longer as an antagonist, but as one of the fold. In 2016, he was invited for a trip to Israel by Jewish Youtuber “Brian of London” (but obviously rather more of Tel Aviv), where he became a mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda. He has since worked for Ezra Levant’s Rebel Media, a Jewish Canadian internet media outlet that has promoted Israeli intersts in the Middle East and Jewish interests in the West, including the usual Jewish hypocracy of advocating a Jewish ethnostate while undermining ethno-nationalism in other countries. Let us be clear: Robinson has always undermined ethno-nationalism for Whites. Just last year during the Charlottesville march, he tweeted this:
Now, whatever one thinks to the Charlottesville march, most of those involved were not “Nazis”, and given Robinson’s familiarity with internet news sources, I’m sure he knows this. He also knows about Jewish power and influence in Britain, particularly as he once tweeted a link to the Traitor Within blog, which exposes Jewish supremacism. Robinson explained this away in that he said he believed the article linked to was about Labour’s immigration policies. Indeed, Robinson has always avoided Jewish influence on immigration into Britain, the anti-British nature of it and them and the forbidding of dissent, with the Board of Deputies of British Jews once proudly advertising their communiqu to Tony Blair of 17th December 1998 on their website, the highlights of which are:
The Board has been at the forefront of the development of proposals for race relations legislation in the UK… The Defence Policy and Group Relations Division, which monitors the activities of political extremists and racists, has urged successive governments to enact and strengthen race relations legislation… It has also sought allies and made common cause with other religious and minority groups.
The Board played a fundamental part in urging upon government the first Race Relations Act which was based, in part, on reports prepared for the Board by Professor Geoffrey Bindman and Lord Lester of Herne Hill. Subsequently the Board has provided written and oral evidence to enquiries which preceded the passage of the Public Order Act 1986, the Criminal Justice Act 1994 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998…..
The social climate affecting racism and racial discrimination has also evolved during that period, and many proposals have been put forward for correcting deficiencies or anomalies in the legislation […] But there remains some scope for improvement.
We regard the proposals of the CRE (Commission for Racial Equality) for legislative change to be well thought out and substantiated […] We are pleased to welcome and endorse the CRE’s published proposals.
In particular we draw attention to proposed 1B, which recommends that the Race Relations Act should apply to all aspects of the activities of Government and all Public Bodies. We would support the extension of the RRA to all government and public bodies. These organisations play a leading role in forming public opinion on social issues…..
The Board can also see the case for new legislation to combat discrimination and incitement on religious grounds […] We are also shortly to respond to the Government’s request that it might consider introducing specific legislation to outlaw Holocaust Denial…..
In addition to changes in the main body of national law, changes are needed in the rules and regulations of many institutions and organisations to decrease or remove discrimination on religious grounds.
I think that pretty much shows what organised Jewry in Britain has been up to in their own words. But onto the present case in hand, Tommy Robinson’s jailing, supposedly for speaking freely. Julie Lake’s article published here got it absolutely spot on: it was his own fault. I will go further: he went there with the express purpose of being arrested and imprisoned so that he could become “a martyr to the cause.” He knew full well that the terms of his suspended sentence received in Canterbury last year, where the judge was surprisingly lenient considering that even then he had been warned in Luton about interfering with ongoing trials, were that he would receive a harsh sentence if he attempted to prejudice another ongoing trial by reporting on it in such a way that prejudiced the jury. For those who do not wish to read the whole thing in the link: here are the highlights:
They were deliberate actions intending to take photographs of the defendants; they were actions which you continued to take, despite having been told that you should not do it, and I find, as a clear logical inference, that your intention on coming into the court building was to seek out the defendants, who you referred to in the way in which we have all seen and heard […] You made it abundantly clear, indeed it is abundantly clear that your mission and purpose was to try and film the defendants. The fact that you failed to do that was because we were able to take avoiding action. You then continued to film in the court building, even though you had been told not to, and these matters were then published on the media with, as I am aware, a very wide viewing rate, referring to the defendants by their religion and referring to them as “Muslim child rapists” or “Muslim paedophiles”…..
This contempt hearing is not about free speech. This is not about the freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism; this is not about political correctness; this is not about whether one political viewpoint is right or another. It is about justice, and it is about ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly. It is about ensuring that a jury are not in any way inhibited from carrying out their important function. It is about being innocent until proven guilty. It is not about people prejudging a situation and going round to that court and publishing material, whether in print or online, referring to defendants as “Muslim paedophile rapists”. A legitimate journalist would not be able to do that and under the strict liability rule there would be no defence to publication in those terms. It is pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting – if reporting indeed is what it is — that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial…..
If something of the nature of that which you put out on social media had been put into the mainstream press I would have been faced with applications from the advocates concerned, I have no doubt, to either say something specific to the jury, or worse, to abandon the trial and to start again. That is the kind of thing that actions such as these can and do have, and that is why you have been dealt with in the way in which you have and why I am dealing with this case with the seriousness which I am…..
The question therefore comes down to what the appropriate disposal should be. In my judgment, an apology, although it is an apology which I accept and for which I thank you, is not sufficient. Neither do I feel in this case that a financial penalty is appropriate. It seems to me that this does need to be met with a custodial sentence. The only question in my mind is whether it might, in the circumstances and bearing in mind that which Mr. Kovalevsky has told me, and which I accept from him about the potential dangers that you might face were I to send you into custody immediately, and bearing in mind the need to ensure that this trial is kept on track, and bearing in mind the fact that, as he says, you will now be under no illusions whatsoever as to what you can and cannot do, whether it might be possible in your case to suspend the sentence of imprisonment which I would otherwise have imposed…..
The sentence, therefore, that I pass upon you […] is one of three months’ imprisonment which will be suspended for a period of 18 months. That will be suspended. There will be no conditions that need to be attached to that suspended sentence, but you should be under no illusions that if you commit any further offence of any kind, and that would include, I would have thought a further contempt of court by similar actions, then that sentence of three months would be activated, and that would be on top of anything else that you were given by any other court. In short, Mr. Yaxley-Lennon, turn up at another court, refer to people as “Muslim paedophiles, Muslim rapists” and so on and so forth while trials are ongoing and before there has been a finding by a jury that that is what they are, and you will find yourself inside. Do you understand? Thank you very much.
Furthermore, it was made clear that the Leeds trial was under reporting restrictions, as stated in an article in The Examiner among other places from the beginning of the trial. Note well the words: “We understand the trial will carry reporting restrictions which would only allow any reporting on conclusion of the case.” The case is not yet concluded, as more are awaiting sentencing. And, as Julie Lake stated, the defendants’ lawyers may now be able to argue for a mistrial. What is as bad is that the whole case has now been forgotten in favor of the Tommy Robinson Show. His grandstanding has made himself the center of attention, and, while I understand the masses’ need for heroes, he has done it at the expense of what is really important: the victims and their families.
What has also disappointed me are the comments that went into moderation, with the utmost filth being written by the army of blind Tommytards — and I am not ashamed to say that I deleted them. I do not say that all who have fallen for Tommy Robinson’s charm and patter are Tommytards, but they need to find better heroes. I understand that the media have built him up as a legitimate rebel leader and working-class hero by constantly interviewing him and giving him air time. Jeremy Bedford-Turner was never given air time, who is currently serving twelve months for so-called hate speech. And where were the talking heads of the alternative media when he was sent down? Where was Lauren Southern, Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson and co. then? Why haven’t they mentioned Alison Chabloz’s trial? Oh right, the power they criticized was Jewish. And there’s the double standard. Their trials have been lobbied for by the very group that Robinson worships.
Here’s what I expect next: I expect leading politicians in Israel to criticise the British government over its handling of Tommy Robinson in order to gain the support of ordinary Britons for Israel and organised Jewry at large. This will mean they will be free to continue the promotion of miscegenation and decadence in British culture. Tommy Robinson’s celebrity will grow — expect a book out soon! And he will lead — oh yes, he will lead — us all to the promised land of kosher fake nationalism, along with the likes of Anne Marie Waters and her “For Britain” party.
And now, here is the real hero when it comes to exposing Muslim child-rape gangs — or rather heroine — who is sadly now deceased. She was Marlene Guest, a woman who worked tirelessly compiling dossiers of evidence and petitioning the police, media and government to investigate and prosecute those responsible, and to do their duty in protecting White children. She continued in her duty while battling cancer right up to her death at the end of 2014. It is a sad fact that the real heroes get no fanfare in the present age, for real heroes are given no air time, but it is my privilege to have known her.
Source: https://mjolnirmagazine.blogspot.co.uk/2018/05/hero-worship-and-tommytards.html
30 comments
oh, please…what are you turning into, joe owens? This tommy incident is an absolute GIFT to white populists from the establishment…don’t look this gift horse in the mouth…although I realize this is probably just a ‘spicy take’ from you…and I do not begrudge you that..
It is a gift only if people do not examine very clearly what actually happened and decide instead to have a white chimp-out for someone who is no more a martyr for our people than Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin were for their people.
That’s rather the point, though — black tribalism is so strong, even in the face of their being collectively such a misbegotten people, that they derive even greater determination, purpose and solidarity even from cases when they are indisputably in the wrong. This helps their cause. The lack of such a circle-the-wagons impulse among whites works to our great detriment.
The Tommy Robinson situation is currently working in our favor. For once, even many fence-sitters are on our side.
To say that we should not capitalize this moment echoes the David French sort of cuckservative self-policing: “We should not use the proven-to-be-effective weapons/approaches that the Left uses, because doing so violates our principles. Better to lose.”
No. Better we win, and if it means adopting some of the weapons/tactics of our opponents, so be it.
Blacks are protected darlings of the establishment.
They are given space to destroy and never subjected to obvious critical questions.
Whites who chimp have no such privileges.
Those who side with Robinson will soon see their credibility in shreds. And credibility is pretty much the only thing we have going for us.
nestor wrote:
“That’s rather the point, though — black tribalism is so strong, even in the face of their being collectively such a misbegotten people, that they derive even greater determination, purpose and solidarity even from cases when they are indisputably in the wrong. This helps their cause. The lack of such a circle-the-wagons impulse among whites works to our great detriment.”
—
nestor, that is so very true…one big failing of the white dissidents is failure to realize that each race has its own weaknesses and strengths…yes, the black race certainly have profound weaknesses…just look at africa….but on the other hand they act in concert together against whits, and they cannot be divided…they have tremendous tribal loyalty and coherence…and they breed like rabbits…
and blacks might just take over the world…that’s right…let me give you a possible future scenario:
what is happening right now is that the elites of the west are now beyond the control of the white majority…and so what they are doing is using immigration to increase the population of the western nations, thus propping up the ponzi economy by increasing consumer demand…as long as the elites can keep growing the population and growing consumer demand via immigration, they can avoid an economic collapse where their asset prices would crumble…so the elites and their nightmare machine economy are like a shark that must keep swimming to avoid drowning…consumer demand is what they seek, like a vampire seeks blood…
and so they are importing millions…from where? From the third world…why? because that is where the people are…but what is happening is that birth rates drop as these undeveloped nations become developed nations…see china…and as india and asia and latin america become more developed, birth rates there will drop…as birth rates in the third world drop, wages will rise and that will decrease immigration to the West…
with birth rates dropping in latin america and asia, and less immigration from latin america and asia to the West, the elites of the West are going to look to the continent least developed and where birth rates will still be high and where wages will still be low..and that would be africa…
so, at some time in the future, the population of the world will be dropping, except for africa…and the elites of the West will still be craving consumer demand, and where will they get those consumers? From african immigrants….african population will still be increasing and the rest of the world’s population will dropping…at some point in time, the population of the world will become majority african…so in the decades to come they out-reproduce us and replace not only whites, but latins and asians…
actually, this may have already happened before–100k years or so in the past, at least according to the Out Of Africa theory pushed by mainstream archaeologists…africans migrated out of africa 100k years ago or so and replaced the neanderthals in europe and asia…
That I actually finally see someone in the WN world address the subject of the diktat of growth in our economic and really financial system. and make the connection that that is…. not so much the reason but the pretext for the unavoidable flooding of our contries… it makes me feel like sobbing hysterically. Because besides all anti-White hate, White self-hate, satanical genociders, power balance considerations, philosophical questions of races and diversity: what in the end forces the hand of the decision maker is his look onto his balance sheet, and then the feeling of the knife to his throat: the collapse, the apocalypse… and the wrath of the people when they learn about the financial system… and that is when it becomes even more easy to succumb to the bribery and the blackmail, and to decide against his people and for more flooding. IMO, it is only if we are aware of the forces that are in play here: the look at the balance sheet, the knowledge of what is sure coming, that we can understand WHAT WE ARE UP AGAINST ! We are up against 1000 billions volt !, we are up against the forces of a deluge of galactic proportions! Just so we know WHAT game we are actually playing!
Well said Peter. There is a strong and unmistakable economic driver beneath the push for mass immigration into Western countries. Some on the ‘Right’ are reluctant to confront it, because to their ears, any criticism of capitalism-as-currently-practiced sounds like socialism. Y’know. Bombin’ muh commies and all..
I’d go so far as to say that unless there’s a substantial change to monetary policy (the way in which new money is created and spent into circulation), ending the growth via mass immigration racket will be nigh on impossible.
In Australia, some non-mainstream economists are starting to question the effects of mass immigration – see link below. I hope that in time the question will extend to the very economic structure of our society, so that we may address the disease rather than the symptoms.
https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2018/05/australias-slave-wage-economy/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20MacroBusiness&utm_content=Daily%20MacroBusiness+CID_c2e52ac8bac7ec15f400b4fd4c876dba&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Australias%20migrant%20slave%20economy%20hidden%20in%20plain%20sight
The out of Africa theory makes no sense , polar Eden or the north to south migratory pattern seems more plausible .
Read paradise found its quite interesting.
there is more to this revolt of ours than deciding who is pure and who is not…
if this war against our treasonous elite is to be won by us (and I doubt it can be won), first we have to get whites agitated and moving against our own elite…we have to get organized, act in concert, and then hurt the elites…and hurting the elites means hurting the economy, because that is the paramount concern for the elites…
a ‘white chimpout’ on behalf of tommy could well be a first act, a warm-up, a proof of concept for the real battle to come…
a white chimpout might at least be something that could hurt the elites…and we have to do SOMETHING to hurt them financially.
first steps first.
The problem is that next time Robinson addresses his fanbase it might be some anti-white nationalist, pro-multicultural posturing, so it’s negative for us. He has influence but it’s a toxic influence because he never actually talks about the real problems facing Britons.
While it might be good to see lots of British rebelling against the system, Robinson is leading his fans down a dead end. He’s a one trick pony; ‘not nice’ Islam. He says nothing about mass immigration, demographic displacement, multiculturalism etc. And when he talks about white people, it’s usually to classify them as racists or how non-whites are just as worthy in the UK as the Native Britons.
Whatever good he might be doing getting Britons to fight back is massively counter-acted by him acting like one of our enemies by ignoring the actual people and rubbishing the actual issues that are killing the UK.
Thank you. Finally, a knowledgeable, succinct appraisal of Robinson and his ilk.
If his mentality is followed, we will have no substantive change in the media establishment, the control of our financial system, the curricula in our schools (from kindergarten to university), the non-White invasion (there is no longer such a thing as immigration), and our foreign policy.
And, yes, Muslims, Blacks, and Mexicans will go right on being as belligerently violent toward native Whites as they are today.
this sounds a lot like purity spiraling from you.. ..tommy aint perfect, but we are not in a position to be picky here
We could use some anti-stupidity spiraling.
“and I am not ashamed to say that I deleted them.”
You ought to be
Right then, Tommytards, let’s talk about criticism. Let’s talk about dear little Tommy signalling – against the BNP
against the NF
against anyone in the EDL who was racialist
against everyone who attended the Unite the Right rally
against anyone in general who discusses the subject of race.
Now who has he NEVER signalled against? I’ll give you a clue: look on his t-shirts.
Another little fact for you: The EDL was formed at the end of June 2009, just after the BNP gained two MEPs in the European elections earlier that month, reaching the height of its powers. We in the BNP were aware at the time that this was done for three reasons:
1. to syphon off support for the BNP and channel it into dead ends
2. to create a group of “far-right” football hooligans that were a soft target for the press and could be linked to the BNP
3. to make good little “anti-racists” out of nationalists.
The formation of the EDL had nothing to do with the Islamic protests during a homecoming parade in Luton where they called the soldiers “baby-killers” and they spat upon them, which pushed Tommy Robinson to take action then and there?
It was a grand conspiracy? Oh my, any evidence for this, because none of it makes sense in the light of Tommy’s obviously little political experience at that point nor the opposition from the Jewish community from the earliest days of the EDL.
I’m starting to see the light. So the British government have conducted a campaign of harrasment against Robinson for the last nine years, including trumped up charges, disproportionate sentencing, raids for offenses that have never warranted raids in British history(like an early morning raid because TR had caused £50,- in damages) and the BBC continually slandering him.
It is all a scheme to make us believe he is legit! They even put his life at risk by forcing him to share cells with Muslim radicals, despite his(obviously deceptive) pleas to get him into solitary. This helped him get beat up in order to share pictures of his bruised body to his working-class fanbase in order to slowly build his reputation. Very clever!
Hey Greg, perhaps Robinson, like the vast majority, stays away from “antisemites” because a great deal of them are off their rocker. I want to thank you for contributing to a culture of frothing-at-the-mouth antisemitism who consider every connection with some second-hand jews as proof of a massive conspiracy.
Trumped-up charges against Robinson? Like what exactly? Are fraud and assault trumped-up charges? The guy has a history of serious criminal activity. I was also correct about Israeli politicians coming out to support Robinson, but they then withdrew their support, probably after realising he was in the wrong:
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/tommy-robinson-arrested-hananya-naftali-israeli-prime-minister-1.464686
Now I’m certainly no fan of Nick Griffin, but what he says about the formation of the EDL and the Zionist agenda here are absolutely correct:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lzqp8atX9AU
The issue with Tommy Robinson is the same as with Jordan Peterson, Sargon, etc. and the alt-lite in general. They criticize the system only to offer a similar version of the same system, with the same underlying principles…However, in the very polarized situation we are in today it becomes difficult to care of nuances. The furious reaction coming from the left against these people suggests that, on balance, they do more damage to system than they prop it. The system can not be reformed and any critical voice is a undermining one….Supporting Tommy is a pragmatical position.
“Here’s what I expect next: I expect leading politicians in Israel to criticise the British government over its handling of Tommy Robinson in order to gain the support of ordinary Britons for Israel and organised Jewry at ..”
Here’s what I predict. This obviously will not happen, but that won’t deter you in making other insane predictions in the future. People like you make it difficult to discuss the JQ.
Tommy Robinson has put it all on the line, no decent human being would fault him for having Jewish allies. These specific are nobodies and clearly are have little influence within their communities.
I’m disgusted with these CC articles to the point that I find it difficult to sympathize with the trials you and GJ go through from now on. Because what you go through is absolutely nothing, its a complete joke compared to the hell Robinson has gone through these last nine years. For his country and for the victims of these rape gangs who are now seeing their tormentors hauled off to prison thanks to Robinson’s political struggles.
Robinson may have helped release members of the tape gang in Leeds. But it was more important for him to have face time on YouTube and get martyr and hero props from people who have been deceived by the false narrative being spread by his shills.
The reporting restrictions where there because the judge would have liked to see the whole case memory-holed. Just like the existence of these rape gangs was memory-holled before Tommy Robinson started putting it all on the line for these victims. How many grieving parents i have seen thanking Tommy Robinson because the media never took an interest in their case, or worse! While you where writing about Wagner, and trying to make sure no one took your picture at any conferences.
Hey Greg, ever went through a periode in your life when your house-address was released time and time again where the only possible source could have been the local police
department? Ever woke up in the middle of the night with Islamic radicals at the door while you have been reading twitter messages all day and every other day about threats about them coming to chop up you, rape your wife and children and chop them up while you watch. Have you then pleaded to the Bedfordshire police department to take action because those hundreds of Muslims making threats were clearly identifiable by name and picture but the police refused to take action? He has received thousands if not tens of thousands of such threats where the police have refused to charge even a single individual.
Have you ever spend months in jail on trumped up charges? How many early morning raids have you experienced? How often have you had your head smashed in? Tommy lost count.
1. Reporting restrictions exist to protect due process.
2. Are you seriously claiming that Robinson is the principal reason why grooming gangs are now being prosecuted?
3. Robinson could have been anywhere in the UK on Friday May 25th talking about the problem. Instead, he showed up at the one place where his presence might cause a mistrial and free these rapists.
This article/forum reminds me of Monty Python’s Life of Brian after Brian is arrested and the zealots meet and bitch about stuff but do nothing.
Sure, being an alt light Jew means he is less radical than the alt right would like, but FFS TR has been imprisoned (AGAIN) for 13 months for daring to criticize the Islam/EU/PC invaders taking over England. He will be exposed to the most vicious, hateful and dangerous enemies possible in prison, not safe in his living room with his family like us.
Clearly TR is not the sharpest knife in the drawer and will never be an intellectual leader of the alt right. He is a working class guy from Luton, (a Luton Town FC supporter), but at least he has the guts to take the fight to the enemy. The main issue here is freedom of speech in the west.
Sorry but these armchair criticisms of him smack of cowardice.
Says someone who is completely anonymous.
It’s pretty unprofessional of you to have a cheap shot at me like that Greg. You know nothing about me – what I do or where I live. I follow you – I like your writings and podcasts. I just disagree on this point. I’m not able to earn a living from what I do for the right so I have to provide for my family as a wage-cuck. But I do bits and pieces where I am. I am influential in certain circles and it wouldn’t work for me to be out there at this stage. I also support certain people financially. I follow quite a range of people from alt-right to alt-light and of course I wish there was less punching right.
Shouldn’t you regard this as just rationalizing cowardice?
The enemy is the Jewish people in tandem with all thoroughly treasonous White politicians who have succumb to their lobbying. Muslims are a symptom, a biological weapon, as are all non-Whites currently being allowed to live in White homelands.
Armchair criticism you say? I stood with Marlene Guest on Rotherham market on several occasions as she distributed leaflets etc., but Barnsley was my local area. There was generally one other person in Rotherham and that was a guy called John Sheldon. I’m guessing you’re not him.
The prediction in this article has come true. Check this out:
https://alisonchabloz.wordpress.com/2018/05/28/tel-aviv-demands-freedom-for-tommy-robinson/
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment