Print this post Print this post

Quinn vs. Cole, Round 1
Paul Nehlen, the JQ, & the GOP

1,758 words

So David Cole over at Taki’s Magazine finally decided to take a swipe at Paul Nehlen, the ‘Alt-Right candidate’ who is challenging Speaker of the House Paul Ryan for his Congressional seat this summer. Nehlen, as many of us know, is a self-identifying white man who stands perhaps a little to the right of President Donald Trump as a proponent of what he calls ‘economic nationalism.’ He is a border hawk; he is pro-gun rights, pro-life, anti-Obamacare, and promises to stand tough on illegal immigration. He is also a serious Christian who isn’t afraid to mix it up with the chosen ones online, as he does quite often on Gab and Twitter. Since he is a self-identifying Jew with conservative tendencies and interests in an astonishingly wide array of cultural matters, I’m surprised it took David Cole this long to fire a shot across Nehlen’s bow.

Given that Cole has long been dismissive of white nationalism and stands by mainstream tenets of diversity despite harboring a soft race realism, it’s no surprise that his assessment of Nehlen is as negative as it is incomplete. For Cole, Paul Nehlen begins and ends with anti-Semitism. Like a one-issue voter, as soon as Cole sees a check in that box, the rest of Nehlen’s résumé becomes irrelevant.

Cole’s article can be summed up like so:

  1. Paul Nehlen is a nobody who will lose to Paul Ryan by a landslide.
  2. Here are some examples of Nehlen saying mean things about Jews.
  3. Paul Nehlen is a Nazi.
  4. Here, let me tell you about what I think of the Jewish Question.
  5. Boy, I really do have a lot to say about the Jewish Question, don’t I?
  6. Yeah, Jim Goad did write a positive piece on Nehlen. But whatever, I just wish Paul Nehlen could be an explicit race realist like Jared Taylor, then maybe he won’t lose to Paul Ryan by a landslide.

So let’s address Point 2 first, since we won’t know if Cole’s prediction in Point 1 is on the money until after the election. David Cole claims that Paul Nehlen is “obsessed with Jews.” But could it be that Jews are obsessed with him? It goes without saying in the Dissident Right that many liberal, diaspora Jews in the West get nervous when encountering race-conscious, race-realist, ethno-nationalist white people who dare to be this way in their own homelands. These Jews tend to be haunted by the Dreyfus Affair and the Leo Frank lynching and the 1881 Russian pogroms and a litany of other injustices, perceived or otherwise, that have always been directed at the Jews and the Jews alone. And this, of course, says nothing about the Holocaust, upon which any educated Jew can expound at length. So then here comes Paul Nehlen who represents pretty much everything these Jews hate in a white person, and Nehlen is the one who’s obsessed? People hit him constantly with threats and insults (he keeps tabs on it on his website), and Cole’s main beef with Nehlen is that he gives as good as he gets.

This is the Atlantic article Cole offers to show how full of hooey Nehlen is. In it, and in the Buzzfeed article about Nehlen linked therein, one can get a good feel for the revulsion that leftists, liberals, and mainstream conservatives have towards him. Nehlen basically says every unfashionable thing imaginable about Jews without advocating violence or law-breaking. For example:

This is pretty much common knowledge on the Dissident Right. In one brilliant exchange, after advising Christians to conceal-carry firearms, a commenter asked why he addressed only Christians. Nehlen responded, “It’s my speech. I’ll advocate for whomever I want, and that will be my Christian brothers and sisters. If you want to advocate for Jews, who’s stopping you?”

Yes, it could be that Nehlen has Jews on the Mind. “Obsessed with Jews” might be taking it a bit too far, however, given that noted clinical psychologist David Cole has yet to psychoanalyze Nehlen on his couch and that Nehlen is a successful businessman and so far has run a dynamic and spirited campaign. It is true Nehlen is not nice to Jews and refuses to signal any kind of philo-Semitism. But I have three points I would like to impress David Cole and others like him regarding this.

One, so what? I mean that. He doesn’t particularly care for Jewish people. So what? It’s his right not to like a group of people if he doesn’t want to. He can still be a good lawmaker, regardless. Teddy Roosevelt didn’t care for Italians and Woodrow Wilson famously disliked blacks. Are we going to say that such prejudices prevented these presidents from fulfilling their agendas and effectively leading? As for the Jews, it’s not like we live in a world of mandatory anti-Semitism, is it? If anything, philo-Semitism is as close to mandatory as you can get in today’s mainstream culture, and in many circles (as I am sure David Cole knows) that philo-Semitism is enforced. Anyone who can buck that trend and not crack under the pressure is a mensch. Sometimes going against the grain for the sake of going against the grain when the grain gets a little oppressive can be a good thing, no? Jewish lawmakers like Chuck Schumer shed crocodile tears over non-whites who get denied access to this country and then walk out on hearings when Americans tell Congress about illegal immigrant murder. Do you think this suggests that Chuck Schumer and other left-wing, liberal Jews particularly like white people? Does anyone call them out on their anti-gentilism? Or perhaps Paul Nehlen is fighting the culture wars the way the Jews have been fighting then for far too long now.

Second, Paul Nehlen is an American, and so far has not shown any inclination he’ll embarrass the Founding Fathers with the policies he proposes. He has never indicated he will curb anyone’s free speech (unlike the Anti-Defamation League, which recently crowed about how it helped Twitter expunge race-realists such as Jared Taylor). He has never promised to deport anyone who has a legal right to be here. He has never promised to limit freedom of religion or press. He has explicitly stated that his platform of economic nationalism does not discriminate on the basis of race. On all other issues, he is reliably, almost predictably, conservative. Seriously, taking away his thing about the Jews, there is little separating him from Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh. Further, his “Shall Not Censor” legislation is nothing short of excellent. I see no reason why Paul Nehlen could not be a first-rate Congressmen for all people on the Right, not just whites.

What’s the problem then? The problem is the many Jews and their goy allies are worried more about what Nehlen doesn’t say rather than what he does say. Paul Nehlen could wrap himself up with a copy of the Constitution, wave the American flag, and recite the Pledge of Allegiance at the top of his lungs, and they’d still call him a closet Nazi. David Cole stated that Paul Nehlen “wants to hand out yellow stars.” Whether he’s joking or not, that’s basically calling him a Nazi right there. And of course, Jews will point to history to justify such suspicions.

Okay, fine. But guess what, fellas? That goes both ways. Given Jewish complicity in the horrors of the Soviet Union in the first half of the twentieth century, whites can do the same thing. If Jews like David Cole have license to paint Hitler mustaches on Paul Nehlen, then whites have the same license to paint little Trotsky goatees on the vast majority of Jewish politicians, celebrities, academics, and media personalities who push leftist agendas. After all, Jews may claim to be egalitarians and say they sympathize with the plight of non-white underdogs. But, if we assume Cole’s suspicious mind, we can say that what’s really going on is that these Jews hate white people and are using all their influence and power to destroy their majorities, interfere with their folkways, crush their identities, delegitimize their religion, murder their unborn, and debase their culture. I can even say the same thing about Cole personally. He faults Paul Nehlen because he doesn’t like white people who get uppity. David Cole is the Man, you see. He may walk among conservatives and entertain them from time to time with colorful complaints about his co-religionists. But, deep down, he’s no different than Abraham Foxman. He wants to keep whitey down and Jews in charge. I can see him counting his shekels and cackling right now.

Of course, I don’t believe this. Yes, there are quite a few truly malevolent Jews out there, like George Soros, who wish harm towards whites and have enough Fuck You money to do something about it. Activists like Foxman and academics like Noam Chomksy fit the bill as well. There are many people like that. But are these Jews any more malevolent than traitorous gentiles like Angela Merkel or Hillary Clinton? Are they any more dangerous to whites than the thousands of useful goy idiots like Joe Biden and the late Ted Kennedy? Eh. That’s a judgment call. The point here is that in order to keep society civil we should give people more credit for what they say than what they don’t say as much as possible. So far, Paul Nehlen has remained disciplined with respect to the US Constitution. That alone should be enough to shield him from the racist abuse that gets heaped on him every day. Sadly, however, it isn’t.

To be concluded in ‘Quinn vs. Cole, Round 2’.

Spencer J. Quinn is a contributor to Counter-Currents and the author of the novel White Like You.


This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Aaron
    Posted February 8, 2018 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    I think Nehlen would have been infinitely more useful as a taqiyya sleeper agent within the GOP than having yet another movement e-celeb. AKA the Ricky Vaughn strategy. Do people not comprehend just how thoroughly asymmetrical this is? This is something that people on the right genuine difficulty coming to grips with. People seem to poo poo the notion that infiltrating the GOP is a waste of time but honestly I would just as likely ascribe that to high time preference and just simple laziness. Have smart, capable people ever really tried? I mean, look at how much Steve King gets away with or Trump for that matter. More cagey guerilla fighters, less fatsos in stahlhelms please.

    • Rob Bottom
      Posted February 8, 2018 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

      At this point we don’t really have the luxury of taking the wait-and-see approach to candidates. Paul Ryan turned out to be a cuckservative of the highest order, a pro-amnesty #neverTrumper. What good is it to America for competitors like Nehlen to hide their patriotism in such a race? As far as I can tell Nehlen has done nothing wrong. If the Chinese were dominating our media the way Jews do, while pushing a similar brand of anti-Americanism, would it be wrong to point that out? Hell no!

      Nehlen may not win but he is opening the eyes of his followers to just how nasty these people can be and how hollow their accusations are. They even doubled down on him for noticing that most of the people attacking him on twitter are Jewish for Christ’s sake!

      This boils down to the same problem leftists have with regards to black crime. We’re not allowed to notice patterns. They don’t want you to connect the dots, and anyone who dares to point out who is responsible for the majority of the crime in this country is branded a racist. But whereas black crime can be blamed on “systemic white supremacy” and “institutional racism”, the over-representation of Jews in the media cannot be easily waved away. There are no built-in excuses for Jewish nepotism in the Marxist ideology permeating college campuses. That is why they’re attacking Nehlen, and that is why we must support him.

      • Aaron
        Posted February 8, 2018 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

        The winning template has already been demonstrated: Trump. Nehlen could have posed a credible threat to Ryan. As things stand now, Ryan can rest assured in his right flank being secured from any serious threat. Nehlen needed to MAGA. Nehlen needed to be Trump Republican and push a pro-working class, pro-industry, low-immigration agenda. Just doing those things, Nehlen woud have made all the right friends and enemies, made all the right people mad. You can say a lot things from such a position, things almost unthinkable 5 or 10 years ago. It is true that he couldn’t say just *anything*. It takes a bit of savvy in knowing where to draw the line. He wrote his political obituary once he goes on FTN and starts flirting with the JQ. He will be lucky to break 1%. That isn’t an indictment of FTN or CoC, merely a recognition of strategic reality.

        • Franklin Ryckaert
          Posted February 9, 2018 at 7:39 am | Permalink

          If Nehlen doesn’t win this election, he could start a YouTube channel with regular commentary on politics and political culture. If he fails in politics he might be successful in meta-politics. He definitely has the potential.

          • ster plaz
            Posted February 13, 2018 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

            Yes, Nehlen’s twitter jousts with jews are educational in the extreme. Shows good intellectual tactics on how to deal with them.

    • Travis LeBlanc
      Posted February 8, 2018 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

      Not many people in our movement have the skill set or the temperament for politics. A lot of politics is networking which requires a high degree of social intelligence. I couldn’t do it. Shaking hands and making small talk with strangers all day with a plastic smile on my face would be my idea of hell.
      I think the purpose of our movement is to change the culture. Once we change the culture, the right politicians will arise organically.

      • Aaron
        Posted February 9, 2018 at 2:36 am | Permalink

        I’m the same way with regard to “shaking hangs and making small talk with strangers”. But regardless, successful social movements are largely built on the backs of people with high social intelligence. And you never reach the point of changing politics or culture otherwise. Nehlen clearly possessed this skill set.

  2. Hoppean-Bolshevik
    Posted February 8, 2018 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Really disappointed in Cole and this article. Considering just the week before he wrote a different article where he basically embraced MacDonald’s view on the JQ, admitting that Jewish liberalism is indeed motivated by hate for White Christians.

    If you acknowledge the indisputable reality of Jewish over representation

    and you acknowledge that Jewish hostility to goys motivates their behavior

    What exactly are you disagreeing with the alt-right about?

  3. Proofreader
    Posted February 8, 2018 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    If there’s a Jewish question, perhaps it’s because the Jews are a questionable people (i.e., of doubtful propriety, honesty, morality, respectability, etc.).

    • ster plaz
      Posted February 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm | Permalink

      Exactly! Just like if there (really) is anti-semitism, then you can be sure there was first some semitism (jew ethno-centralism) going on that caused the anti-semitism. (From the recently passed Ernst Zuendel, the first one I heard say such)

  4. Russell
    Posted February 9, 2018 at 3:15 am | Permalink

    This isn’t the revisionist David Cole is it?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace