Print this post Print this post

If We Do Nothing, a Review

2,737 words

Jared Taylor
If We Do Nothing: Essays and Reviews from 25 Years of White Advocacy
Oakton, VA: New Century Books, 2017

Jared Taylor’s most recent book If We Do Nothing leaves us with many reminders of why he is the most important writer in the white advocacy movement today. In compiling this volume, Taylor selected thirty-seven essays from his twenty-five years as editor of American Renaissance, his race-realist publication and webzine. Despite being originally published years apart, many of these articles will strike the reader by their consistency in tone, language, and of course, content. Jared Taylor has never wavered from his focus on white advocacy, and as a writer he is as just as deft and insightful now as he was in 1992 when American Renaissance first appeared. If not for a few topical references and editor’s notes stating when and for whom each essay was published, these essays would flow seamlessly from one to the next.

From a white nationalist perspective, a perspective that is perhaps a bit harder than Taylor’s own, these essays represent both a return to fundamentals as well as a challenge to always look at the perpetual yet protean human condition with fresh eyes. While both of these are extremely important, it is in the latter case where we find the most value in If We Do Nothing since only Jared Taylor can think and write in the way he does. If we can aspire to equal his aristocratic reserve, his mordant wit, and his piercing acumen in the face of the tide of history which, at the very least, is threatening to make life very uncomfortable for the white race in the next few decades, then we will be better people for it, let alone better white nationalists.

Of course, like his other works, Paved with Good Intentions and White Identity, If We Do Nothing belongs on the bookshelf of any serious student of white racialist or identitarian causes. Jared Taylor’s reputation precedes him enough that If We Do Nothing should be snapped up by most of us sight unseen. However, for those who are unfamiliar with his work, not sure about this race thing, or are on the fence about how well Jared Taylor can still redpill the red-pilled, I will attempt in this review to break down the man’s considerable talents.

In my opinion, Jared Taylor’s most distinctive quality is his penchant to unmask double standards and hypocrisies through what I would call ‘clever absurdities.’ He is so adept at this that I imagine it would be a central part of his writing even if he lived in an all-white world and the topic of race never needed to come up. For example, in the book’s titular essay (from a speech he delivered at the first American Renaissance conference in 1994) Taylor underlines the true nature of racial diversity by pointing out that “No one is urging Howard University, which is overwhelmingly black, to recruit Hispanics or Asians so its students can benefit from racial diversity.” Kind of absurd to think about, but yes, Taylor is right. No one is doing that. It’s also absurd to imagine black Howard students wanting to ‘benefit’ from diversity of any kind at their school. In this one nimble sentence, Jared Taylor manages to tell two truths: one trivial (Howard is not under pressure to become racially diverse), and one profound (racial diversity is a weapon meant to attack only whites). And juxtaposing these twin truths is both funny and enlightening. If We Do Nothing is rife with quips like this.

Here is one more I’d like to share if only because it produced a true laugh-out-loud moment for me. In his 2002 essay dealing with the shameless money-grubbing of the Martin Luther King Jr. family, Taylor discusses how the Kings have copyrighted every word their patriarch ever wrote and charged exorbitant fees for any media outlet to reproduce them. In 1993, the family sued USA Today for reprinting King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, demanding $1,700 plus legal costs. USA Today caved, of course, and this is what Jared Taylor had to say about it:

In the current era of abasement, few were rude enough to point out that such punctilious insistence on intellectual property rights ill-becomes the family of a man who was, himself, a life-long plagiarist.

Another color in Jared Taylor’s vast palette is the thought experiment. He never calls it that, but that’s what this technique amounts to, and he uses it a lot. In “Noble Fiction – or Noxious Poison,” Taylor undresses the notion of closing the testing gap between white and black students by pointing out how insane and futile it would be to spend millions on closing a similar gap within a race. After all, who’s trying to make all white kids or all black kids get the same grades? So why would closing it between the races be any different? I have put a considerable amount thought into the topic of race for over twenty years now, and I have never come up with anything so elegant and pithy. And this is Jared Taylor’s bread and butter in If We Do Nothing.

My favorite thought experiment, however, appears in Taylor’s 2015 “An Open Letter to Conservatives” which was originally addressed to “Cuckservatives.” In it, he devastates conservative race blindness by proposing that conservatives test their principles beyond the white world for once:

Let’s consider your principles. Do you dream of a traditional, religious, free-market society with small government, low taxes, and no gun control, where same-sex marriage is illegal, and abortion, divorce, prostitution, and illegitimacy are scorned? There are such places: the tribal areas of Pakistan and Somalia.

And what about countries that violate your principles — with high taxes, huge government, clogged markets, a weak church, strict gun control, and sexual license of all kinds? There’s Scandinavia. And yet if you had to leave the United States you’d much rather live in Denmark than in Waziristan.

Do you see the pattern? Even when they violate your principles, white people build good societies. Even when they abide by your principles, non-whites usually don’t.

It is this kind of dialectic one-two combination that exposes how useless conservatism has become in the twenty-first century.

Another technique Taylor employs to great effect is what I call “The Catechism.” Basically, Taylor asks uncomfortable question after uncomfortable question until he leads the reader (by the nose, if need be) to an inescapable conclusion about the primacy of race. He employs this technique most effectively also in “An Open Letter to Conservatives”:

Do you stand for limited government and a balanced budget? Count your black and Hispanic allies. Do you admire Thomas Jefferson? He was a slave-holder who will end up on the dung heap with the Confederate flag. Do you care about stable families and the rights of the unborn? Look up illegitimacy, divorce, and abortion rates for blacks and Hispanics. Do you cherish the stillness at dawn in Bryce Canyon? When the park service manages to get blacks and Hispanics to go camping they play boom-boxes until 1:00 a.m. ‘Was Ronald Reagan your hero? He would not win a majority of today’s electorate.

Do you love Tchaikovsky? Count the non-whites in the concert hall. Do you yearn for neighborhoods where you can leave the keys in your car? There still are some; just don’t expect them to be “diverse.” Are hunting and firearms part of your heritage? Explain that to Barack Obama or Sonia Sotomayor. Are you a devout Christian? Muslim immigrants despise you and your faith. Do you support Israel? Mexicans, Haitians, Chinese, and Guatemalans don’t.

On top of these Taylorian flourishes, Jared Taylor furthermore demonstrates the thorough research and mental agility one would expect from a first-rate essayist. In one of his longest and most eye-opening chapters, “The Racial Ideology of Empire,” Taylor argues quite convincingly how whites have always been squeamish about race. He brings up the naïve evangelism of the Jamestown settlers as a great example, but also offers evidence from red-pilled historical figures such as the explorer David Livingstone, philanthropist Albert Schweitzer, and author and poet Rudyard Kipling. In a stroke of pure genius, he takes what was known as “the Natal formula,” which is a great example of such squeamishness, and shows how whites suffer from updated versions of it today. The Natal formula was a way for white people to act in a racist manner while officially opposing racism. At the end of the nineteenth century, white South Africans wanted to exclude Indians from emigrating there. But the colonial ministry in England overruled them since the Crown considered such crass racism to be a no-no, even back then. So, to get around this proscription, the South African authorities developed laws which effectively excluded Indians without ever mentioning race; that is, an Indian would have to offer a large sum of money and prove they are fluent in a European language before being allowed entry. All because whites, in the case, the British elites, could not bring themselves to admit that race is real. To do so would have been unseemly.

Today, as Taylor points out, whites reinvent the Natal formula whenever they flee cities due to ‘crime’ and ‘bad schools’ and set up suburbs where most blacks and Hispanics simply cannot afford to live. Therefore, one can act in a racist manner and still not have to call oneself racist.

Nor does If We Do Nothing do without Jared Taylor’s mordant wit. It may take some sophistication to appreciate, but at times it can approach Oscar Wilde levels of incisiveness. In his 2008 essay “The Rush for the Lifeboats” Taylor describes how the online magazine Slate published a series of articles on how IQ is at least partially heritable and then was forced to awkwardly backtrack in the ensuing weeks. When Slate’s ‘critique-at-large’ Stephen Metcalf denounced the article’s conclusions as both “flatly untrue” and “highly questionable,” Taylor responded, tongue-in-cheek, “Please make up your mind, Mr. Metcalf.” In his “Transition to Black Rule?”, written shortly after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, Taylor compares the liberal giddiness over America’s first black president to a similar giddiness over the end of South African Apartheid in 1994. He points out quite trenchantly how that giddiness had quickly evaporated due to black misrule. Specifically, he takes to task a pinhead Washington Post journalist named Mary McGrory who in 1994 gushed that dispatches from South Africa would soon resemble scripture “that cannot be read except through tears.” After a paragraph describing the disaster that post-Apartheid South Africa has become, Taylor then writes, “Surely, not even Mary McGrory would think that this sounds like the Book of Matthew.”

I do have a quibble, however. In his 2009 “Race and Literature: Why is it Always Liberal?” (in which he discusses Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird), Taylor provides a brief survey of racialist literature and states that are no great race-realist novels. He offers Thomas Dixon’s The Clansman, Pyotre Krassnoff’s From Double Eagle to Red Flag, Harold Covington’s Northwest Quartet, William Pierce’s novels, Mister by Alex Kurtagic, and White Apocalypse by Kyle Bristow as examples and concludes that these novels are either poor in quality, not really about race, or political tracts disguised as fiction. He may be right about this. But why no mention of Tito Perdue? Why no mention of Red Rock by Thomas Nelson Page, which was a best seller in the 1890s and dealt explicitly (and quite artfully) with race during the period of Reconstruction? As far as race-realist novels go, Red Rock may still set the standard today. I am sure I am not alone in wondering if Jared Taylor would agree.

Of course, I would be short-changing the Counter-Currents readership by not bringing up Jared Taylor’s treatment the Jewish Question. For him, as we all know, it is not really a question, and so he feels no need to address it as such. There is one passage in If We Do Nothing, however, which comes close. In his brilliant “The Ways of Our People” from 1996 he states:

Some people likewise insist that Jews are to blame for the poisoned state of mind common among whites. There is no doubt Jews have taken the lead in promoting the forces of dispossession and attacking the bases for traditional distinctions. However, they have found more than willing accomplices among non-Jews, and to blame Jews for white capitulation is a little like blaming whites for all the failures of blacks. Without a doubt, many who encourage whites in their suicidal proclivities are Jews, but those proclivities had to exist before they could be encouraged.

As objectionable as many might find this passage to be, it is not technically wrong. To blame only Jews for the straits whites are in today is letting a lot of evil, self-hating whites off the hook as well as millions of well-meaning, gullible ones. It is true that whites would end their troubles with Jews by adopting pro-white, racialist positions as Taylor prescribes in If We Do Nothing. Taylor’s argument resembles the one my father used to use on me when I complained about bullies at school. “Be strong, be tough, and be willing to fight, and the bullies won’t mess with you,” he said. And he was not wrong. In fact, his advice worked. However, like Taylor’s treatment of the Jewish Question, it leaves half of the problem unaddressed: that there are people out there who take an active role in harming whites in the first place. Are we not allowed to notice or act upon this knowledge? If all the bullies in school were black, Hispanic, or Arab then we can, but not if they were all Jewish? Why? Because they look white to Jared Taylor? Is that really a good enough reason?

By avoiding the Jewish Question, Jared Taylor reminds me of a boxer who fights not to lose rather than fights to win. There is a difference, and boxing fans know it. White nationalists and identitarians know it as well, and it is one reason why Jared Taylor and American Renaissance are criticized in certain circles of the movement. But I can understand Taylor’s trepidation over the Jews. Adapting a counter-Semitic world view is a little like playing with fire. It can consume you if you are not careful. It is one thing to discuss the Jews who deceitfully schemed to achieve the anti-white Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling in 1954 (as Taylor does in “Brown v. Board: the Real Story”). It is something else entirely to use this to support the stereotype of Jews being, well, deceitful schemers (as Taylor does not do). The former is playing not to lose while the latter is playing to win. The problem with playing to win, however, is that it requires greater risk which ultimately can make you lose. Surely, those who blame a layoff or their painful divorce on the (((Jooos))) fall into this category. But so do those who harbor deep distrust or hatred for people simply because one of their grandparents or great-grandparents was Jewish. That’s taking counter-Semitism in an unproductive direction in my opinion, and Jared Taylor, always the epitome of class, never does this.

If We Do Nothing runs the gamut of American Renaissance race realism and should be required reading for the uninitiated. There is a red pill on every page, and Jared Taylor’s research, wit, and insight will make them go down as easily as possible. However, to the already-initiated who crave more—especially on the Jewish Question—I will say this: someone has to hold the Judeo-neutral position in our movement. Someone has to provide that ballast. So why not Jared Taylor? It is only by comparing ourselves to such an absolute than we can measure how far into counter-Semitism we have come or need to go. Yes, in order for whites to solve their current troubles, a critical mass of them must lose their agnosticism towards Jews. Yes, a no-Jews policy in the future would help prevent debacles like Brown v. Board of Education from happening again. In fact, much of If We Do Nothing would be rendered moot if such a policy had been implemented across the white world in the first place. But with his careful neutrality on the Jewish Question, Jared Taylor should serve as a constant reminder that things can, indeed, be taken too far.

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted January 10, 2018 at 5:11 am | Permalink

    Jews are a middle-eastern Semitic people genetically akin to Babylonians, Assyrians, Phoenicians and Arabs. They are ORGANICALLY alien to the Aryan tribes and like Negroes can never be comfortable inside western societies. They loathe and envy white people and seek to reverse western norms even when they benefit from them. Jewish anti-white racism is the most successful expression of racism in the modern world. They adore multiculturalism as an efficient tool for reducing white influence. For these reasons and many more, I have no criticism of past and, hopefully, future efforts toward the eradication of the Jewish presence in western societies.

  2. Leon Haller
    Posted January 10, 2018 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Good essay. I had not previously thought about Taylor’s rhetorical techniques, despite having read him for decades.

    A correction and a lacuna. AR started in 1990. And when considering the alleged non-existence of great racialist novels, why no mention of The Camp of the Saints, a great work of literature as well as prophecy (and certainly one of the greatest dystopian works ever written)? Back in the 80s, at least some of the usual types sniffed racist elements in Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities. And many works of “classic” literature were at least race-realistic and generically Occidentalist, if not ideologically racist or White nationalist. Conrad and especially Kipling come to mind.

  3. Sandy
    Posted January 10, 2018 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    Today, as Taylor points out, whites reinvent the Natal formula whenever they flee cities due to ‘crime’ and ‘bad schools’ and set up suburbs where most blacks and Hispanics simply cannot afford to live. Therefore, one can act in a racist manner and still not have to call oneself racist.

    That was too funny. We whites do live a life of self deception and deceit. One wonders if “the others” really hate us or just despise us. After all, so many of us profess to be Christian and yet totally ignore our God’s command of let your yes be yes and your no be no. So when they call us devils maybe they are right in that the father of lies is the devil. I’ll have to work on that one!

  4. Phillip Smith
    Posted January 10, 2018 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    ‘Surely, those who blame a layoff or their painful divorce on the (((Jooos))) fall into this category’

    you will notice that the author uses a favourite spelling of the word used by Jewish publications to caricature people who understand the Jewish question as simplistic and incapable of pronouncing the word Jews correctly ( i.e anti-Semites are stupid). For all of those (divorced, from time to time crippled) personal failures in life reading this blog such ridiculous and hostile commentary should be obvious. For my own part becoming red pilled was something I did (with great difficulty) for myself, a product of a very inquisitive mind and a lot of research not an unthinking prejudice spun out into a world view.

    We pride ourselves in this movement (whether you call it White nationalism or the alt-right) in not allowing what we see with our own eyes to be subverted by a hostile dialectic and false media images. With that in mind I would like to extrapolate on what *I have* seen with my own eyes. While I do not hold a small amount of Jewish ancestry against any one who wants to identify as White or be involved in this movement, I have personally witnessed many half and quarter Jews who are implacably hostile to White interests and who furthermore are racially different in behaviour and psychological profile. It may seem hard hearted to say this but I have seen many quarter Jews who are unable to take their own ethnic blinders off and see things from the White perspective.

    I am just annoyed that while I can find out what world Jewry thinks by reading virtually any media source, in my one space free of all that I now have to brace my self against bad faith insults directed at all those (non existent) anti -semites who I have never never encountered after ten years of being red pilled on the JQ.

    If the author of this piece would care to take a poll I am almost certain that he would find that the majority of what he calls ‘counter-semites’ did not inherit their attitudes about Jews from family or develop them in bad personal circumstances, but through a lot of hard work and intellectual enquiry, came to a better and more fuller understanding of the world that world Jewry is keen to suppress.

    • Lurr
      Posted January 11, 2018 at 6:12 am | Permalink

      I think aversion against jews mainly comes from being around jews. People who never habe been around them dont understand why there even exists people who dislikes jews. Thats my experience, writing from Sweden. Conversation goes like that:

      Guy 1: “But Whats so bad about jews? They are integrated, They do well and are well spoken. They are as swedish as anyone”
      Guy 2: “Its hard to explain. But They dont consider themselves as sweds, not sweds only”.
      Guy 1: “so What? There are Christian sweds, why not jewish? And They have always been under attack. We should protest them! I dont undurstand you”.
      Guy 2: “you should educate yourself on this. You will see that Im not as crazy as you think now. If you dislike the current development with the immigration, you will see that the big preventer of a change is jewish people, time and again”.

    • Twin Ruler
      Posted January 14, 2018 at 3:43 am | Permalink

      The key to it all: learning about the history of the Soviet Union, during The Second World War! After one does so, one wonders why others make such a big deal about The Third Reich.

  5. Twin Ruler
    Posted January 14, 2018 at 3:37 am | Permalink

    When they say The Holocaust is Uniquely Evil, that is merely their disguised way of saying that they feel that the German people, themselves, are Uniquely Evil. A cruel form of defamation against Germans. What better way to counter such a claim, than to point out that the Soviet Communists, especially under Joseph Stalin, carried out many, many of the same types of military atrocities and crimes against Humanity, usually associated with the National Socialists? And, this was especially so, irony of ironies and absurdity of absurdities, during The Second World War. You know, what was inaccurately described as The Good War?

    After all, what do they suppose The Gulag was? Indeed, people in the West do not seem to realize just how much the Gulag of the Soviet Union resembled the Extermination Camps of The Third Reich. The Soviet NKVD, much like their opposite numbers in the Nazi SS, came up with varied and rather macabre ways of torturing, butchering, and working to death their victims, in and out of the Gulag. May not have, exactly had those vast, homicidal gas chambers, nor experimented with making fat out of soap, but do any realize just how satanic and vicious the NKVD was?

    One has to wonder. Notice, the Leftist media never tends to dwell upon Soviet sins, as much as Nazi ones. Then, there is the ridiculous claim that somehow Communism and Nazism are opposites– on opposite sides of what is termed “The Political Spectrum.”

    • Leon Haller
      Posted January 16, 2018 at 7:28 am | Permalink

      Are you a 1980s version of Rip van Winkle?! You are making arguments that the Right was making when I was starting college at the beginning of the Reagan Admin. Everyone here understands that the communist filth was far more evil than the Nazis – and at least some here don’t think the Nazis were bad at all (I do, but I still think it would have been better for the US to have stayed out of WW2).

      • Twin Ruler
        Posted January 21, 2018 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

        Americans seem to be trying to hard to feel good about WW2. I suppose, it is to compensate for their failure in Vietnam. Intriguingly, Americans have never defeated a single Communist country. I wonder why?

      • Twin Ruler
        Posted January 21, 2018 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

        The reason the U.S. got involved at all, was to save the British Empire: Great Britain itself to be more precise. Lots of Anglophiles, back then. This was especially so in America. By the way, I sincerely predict that once Brexit is accomplished, the United Kingdom itself shall actually disassemble into its components: England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.

        Speaking of which, I am beginning to wonder, these days, what exactly the Irish people feel about The Second World War? Do they, of all people, assume the British were really any better, any different, than the Germans or the Japanese? And if so, why?

        English call themselves British, hoping that the Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish will do the same. Sad really. For, after all, it is eerily like the practice of Germans calling themselves Europeans, hoping the rest of the EU shall do the same. Wait, speaking of Brexit, I wonder if others, on the Other Side of The Pond have heard of Calexit? That, of course, is the hope of the Californians that they shall gain independence from the rest of The United States. Not a pleasant thought, either.

    • Billy
      Posted January 20, 2018 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

      Twin ruler, Why do you think the media and Hollywood is silent on murders of 60,000.000 innocent whites under Stalin’s rule? They have made hundreds of holocaust movies and yet I’ve never seen one on the biggest mass-murder in history. I also am more than a little suprised to read the soap out of Jewish fat story in 2018. You forgot the lampshades out of Jewish skin…..

  6. Twin Ruler
    Posted January 14, 2018 at 4:00 am | Permalink

    I fear that once Brexit is accomplished, the UK shall itself disassemble into its components: England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. And, of course, most significantly Northern Ireland. For then, the Irish Nationalists shall have their dream of a United Ireland. The Ulster Scots, they shall suffer.

    And Heaven forbid, the world runs out of Germans. After all, who would Steven Spielberg and Daniel Goldhagen, and the rest of their ilk, come after, once there are no more Germans, or at any rate once the Germans are bred out of existence? Why, they would go after the English, and those of English ancestry, around the world. (((They))) will cry rivers of tears about the plight of the Irish Catholics in Northern Ireland, more than the Irish Catholics themselves.

    I had seen the beginnings of this, in the obsession the U.S. Media had with the Irish, and all things Celtic, during the 1990’s, under the Clinton Administration. And, besides, there were some books vilifying WASPs, as well.

Post a Reply to Twin Ruler Cancel reply

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace