Print this post Print this post

Our Sheep Are the Best

2,332 words

Now and then I encounter fellow travelers who have become fed up with our movement due to what they perceive as the incorrigible stupidity of white people. Let us take stock. Whites are on a fast track to being replaced by some other people (in Europe by black and Arab Muslims, in America by mestizos). Their culture is literally being torn down all around them. They are constantly being demonized and blamed for everyone’s problems. And their spirit (what’s left of it) is being crushed in grossly obvious ways. They are forbidden to have any sense of white identity other than guilt. They are forbidden to object to their replacement (via hate speech laws, social shaming, etc.). Finally, and perhaps most horrifically, they are forced to watch impotently as their women are groped and raped (Cologne, Stockholm), as their children are violated (Rotherham), and as the non-white culprits get off with a slap on the wrist.

Yet the vast majority of whites seem to accept all this, in a manner that is so contemptibly meek and docile it makes me think we need to invent a stronger word than “contempt” to express the probably inexpressible intensity of the loathing I feel for them. And, of course, many whites are not just accepting all the above, they are cheering it along. Indeed, it is whites themselves that are principally responsible for everything that currently threatens their survival, for if we wanted to, we could end this situation overnight. Faced with the enormity of this situation, it is only natural that some of us would conclude that whites are not worth saving, and decide to go and cultivate our own garden.

A British friend, who must remain nameless, dropped out of movement circles in the UK years ago when he had the experience of being literally spat upon by white people at a protest intended to support white people (it was a BNP event, or a skinhead event, or something—I don’t remember now). He dropped political involvement, for the most part (though recently it seems that his political interest is returning). My friend’s reaction is, it must said, both understandable and defensible. If the people you are trying to help not only reject your help but spit on you, it seems reasonable to conclude that they are not worth helping.

And I know many others who are on the cusp of giving up: weary of the ethno-masochism of white folk, of their stubborn unwillingness to take their own side. Again and again these weary warriors invoke the same image: white people are like sheep. This could, in fact, be an insult to sheep: though they may be quite docile in being herded around and led off to the slaughter, at least they haven’t vocally endorsed getting slaughtered. Setting this aside, the problem here is that those who make such a charge are simply expecting too much of their own people. In fact, virtually all people, of whatever race, are sheep.

In the sixth century BC the philosopher Heraclitus said that most people live their lives as if “asleep.” He asked “what understanding or intelligence have they?” and remarked that they “take the mob for their teacher.” A few years later another early philosopher, Parmenides, said that most people were “deaf and blind alike, dazed, hordes without judgment.” More famously, Socrates characterized the people as a big, dumb, sleeping horse that he, as a gadfly, had to sting into wakefulness. And his student Plato spoke of most men as chained in a cave of their own making, taking shadows for real objects, and hating the man who might offer to set them free. If one looks to the philosophers of the East, one finds similar statements (the anonymous authors of the Upanishads, for example, urge men to “wake up!”).

Sheepiness is sleepiness, in short. And it is universal. Pretty much everyone, in every society is a sheep asleep. And one often finds this where one least expects to. For example, most of today’s philosophers and scientists—who are supposed to be men of reason—are sheep. (And one supposes that this has always been true—perhaps the work of the ancient philosopher-sheep has simply not survived because, of course, it didn’t deserve to.) Most smart and educated people are only independent-minded up to a point. Very often they are only willing to ask penetrating questions and entertain heretical thoughts within a limited domain.

For example, Einstein turned classical physics upside down with relativity theory, but in his social and political views he was a mushy Leftist, with headpiece full of straw. Einstein famously said “You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.” But of course you can: it’s called deterrence, brainiac! For a genius, Einstein was actually pretty dumb. Today’s physicists are even worse. Lots of people evidently want to turn to Stephen Hawking for guidance, figuring that since he’s both a genius in physics and a pitiable gimp he must be positively overflowing with wisdom. But as soon as Hawking stops speaking about physics and starts spouting off about anything else the result is cringeworthy. Perhaps the most overrated intellectual of the last hundred years was Bertrand Russell: a brilliant mathematician who completely sucked as a philosopher, especially when he pronounced on politics. These men excelled within certain fields, but both the depth and the range of their thinking was quite limited.

One of the most disheartening experiences you can have in life is to discover the real limits of people close to you, especially people you looked up to as sagacious. I’ll wager this is an experience every single one of my readers has had. What typically happens is that you spend perhaps years with such a person, awed by their perceptiveness within certain areas, looking to them for guidance. Then one day you ask some question or other, or innocently confront them with a certain fact. And then it is as if a wall goes up, dividing the two of you. You realize that this person you admired has intellectual limits beyond which they fear to go; each has a kind of intellectual Forbidden Zone into which they will not venture. And suddenly you’re seeing them all fleecy and docile.

Only very rarely do we meet individuals who are truly fearless, in that they will ask any question, and draw any conclusion, if that is where the evidence leads them. And some of those people are actually disappointing because they turn out to be spergs. In other words, they’re not boldly venturing into the Forbidden Zone in conscious rebellion against the forces of conformity and damning the hurt feelings of others—rather, they just don’t get the social signals of conformity and hurt feelings. This is why so many men in our movement are spergie (myself included): any forbidden idea will attract lots of spergs, because they are insensitive to the social pressures that make an idea forbidden. (And this is also the reason why so many men who are drawn to our ideas are also drawn—very disappointingly—to kooky conspiracy theories: run as fast as you can from anyone who wants to conjoin White Nationalism with, say, Flat Earth.)

Nevertheless, the spergs are useful—as are, especially, those who are willing consciously to defy orthodoxy and go wherever their minds lead them. And these people, in turn, are the ones who must lead the sheep. You see, it’s no good complaining that white people are sheep. Of course they are. But they are capable of great things when they are herded by the right folks. Unlike real sheep, our “sheep” are not dumb or talentless. No, they are in fact the finest sheep in the world. I would also say that we have more independent thinkers per ovium capita (per sheep head) than any other race. This is why, despite the fact that the vast majority of us are sheep, we have led the world in science, exploring, and every other field. We have more fearless folk willing to venture into the Forbidden Zone. And as for our sheep, though they won’t set off for the Forbidden Zone on their own initiative, they can be persuaded when someone else leads the charge. When this happens, the sheep become more than mere sheep—though, again, this never happens under their own power.

Nevertheless, those of us in North America seem to face a particular challenge. Our sheep seem to be especially sheepy. And this was noticed long ago. Tocqueville in Democracy in America includes a section titled “The Power Exercised by the Majority in America over Thought.” He writes:

I know no country in which, speaking generally, there is less independence of mind and true freedom of discussion than in America. . . . In America the majority has enclosed thought within a formidable fence. A writer is free inside that area, but woe to the man who goes beyond it. . . . Before he goes into print, he believes he has supporters; but he feels that he has them no more once he stands revealed to all, for those who condemn him express their views loudly, while those who think as he does, but without his courage, retreat into silence as if ashamed of having told the truth. . . . Hence the majority lives in a state of perpetual self-adoration; only strangers or experience may be able to bring certain truths to the Americans’ attention.

And more recently D. H. Lawrence wrote: “I have never been in a country where the individual has such an abject fear of his fellow countrymen. Because, as I say, they are free to lynch the moment he shows he is not one of them.” (See Derek Hawthorne’s essay “D. H. Lawrence on America” for more information.) Rather than freeing us to speak our minds and go boldly forth into the unknown, democracy (even with our First Amendment) seems to have shut most of us down. And what Tocqueville observed has become even more extreme today, with so many Americans terrified to open their mouths for fear of offending others, and feeling obliged to preface every statement with some disclaimer like “This is just my opinion . . .” Somehow, the idea that everyone has the right to an opinion became the idea that everyone has the right to have their opinion go unchallenged—or even that every opinion is equally right (a.k.a. relativism).

One sees something of the same phenomenon across the pond, no doubt at least partly due to America’s influence. In Europe we see it coupled, disastrously, with certain indigenous phenomena such as “German guilt.” Among the Germans, fear of the majority and of giving offence is coupled with a pernicious ethno-masochism—really, a will to self-annihilation. (A Jewish acquaintance of mine put it succinctly and not, I might add, without sympathy: “They want to die.”) In addition, we see sheepishness and conformity in Europe coupled with suffocating speech laws which can land one in jail for trespassing where thought is verboten. However, for my money there’s something uniquely witless about the conformity and timidity of Americans, even of those who can knock an IQ test out of the park.

In any case, I believe the key to winning over the American sheep (of the white variety, of course) is simply the awakening of more and more of us non-sheep who have the potential to be awakened. If Americans are intimidated by numbers, and afraid to hold minority opinions, then all we can hope for is a “tipping point,” where the sheep start noticing that more and more people are willing to embrace ideas they may be privately drawn to, but are too terrified to express when they feel all alone. Here I have good news: this is now happening. As wretched as our American sheep are, there seems hope for them yet.

Perhaps my being an American surrounded by Americans just makes me loathe the conformity of my own people more intensely, and makes me imagine that somehow white people are a little less ovine elsewhere. (My European readers can certainly weigh in on this issue in the comments section.) But this brings me to an important point, and the one on which I will conclude. If we wish to save our people, not only must we banish the notion that the majority of them can be anything other than sheep, we must also try to . . . gulp . . . love our sheep. This is a case of me asking my readers to do something that I myself find incredibly difficult. It’s hard for me to feel anything other than contempt for the white sheep. Nevertheless, to be a good White Nationalist (and, let us hope, a successful one) I know this is what I have to strive for, and I know that the means for getting there is sympathy. Instead of hating the sheeple I need to feel sorry for them. I need to accept that the majority of my people will always be such, and accept and pity their limitations. I need to see that my people have all sorts of potential—just not for completely unfettered thought. And I need to see that that potential can be actualized under the guidance of the right herdsmen.

Most of all I need to stop—just a little bit—being so damned elitist! After all, this movement is supposed to be all about love of one’s own. In another essay I wrote that the dirty little secret of White Nationalism is that “many of us do not really love our race.” This is something we need to work on. Misanthropy and unrealistic expectations have absolutely no value for us. We even need to get beyond the sort of thinking I’ve seemingly endorsed by my “funny” title, “Our Sheep are the Best.” The reason to love and protect our sheep is NOT that they are the best. It’s that they are OUR sheep. In truth, this is all that needs to be said.

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. lostcausemonaut
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 7:46 am | Permalink

    excellent! “our sheep are best sheep” 🙂

  2. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 8:29 am | Permalink

    Some remarks :

    1) “…Einstein famously said “You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.” But of course you can: it’s called deterrence…”

    Yup, the ancient Romans had the saying : si vis pacem, para bellum,“if you want peace, prepare (for) war”.

    2) The masses of all races and ethnicities consist of “sheep”. That is a reality we have to work with. What the sheep need is good shepherds, and if they they have them, they can be led to great things. If they have bad shepherds they can be led to great destructive actions or great follies such as Mao’s “cultural revolution” or medieval Europe’s “Children’s Crusade”.

    3) What most people call their “beliefs” or “opinions” are simply ideas they have picked up from their environment. That’s why you can have “maps of religions”. People believe what their environment believes.

    4) Most “intellectuals” are also sheep, but more intelligent ones. They can formulate – in intelligent terms – the beliefs of their fellow-sheep, but they have not formed them themselves.

    5) “Heretics” are by their very nature loners. Some are fools, some are (misunderstood) geniuses. The “sheep” have no inner faculty to distinguish the two.
    If by chance a “heretic” is finally recognized as a genius, the sheep will also follow him, but only because he has been recognized by the authorities and not because they understand him.

    6) So we are left with the sober conclusion that the majority of people (of whatever identity) consists of sheep and that will always remain so.

    7) “Love your sheep (if they are your own sheep)”. Indeed, now let us become good shepherds !

  3. Lifthrasir
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    Well stated, Mr. Costello. Your essay pairs perfectly with the chapter on propaganda in Mein Kampf.

    Whites need an army of brilliant propagandists who can reach the sentiments of the masses, wielding that spiritual weapon of propaganda to secure and advance the existence of our people.

  4. Buttercup
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    “many men who are drawn to our ideas are also drawn—very disappointingly—to kooky conspiracy theories: run as fast as you can from anyone who wants to conjoin 9/11, GMO, vaccine and cosmological truth with, say, White Nationalism…”

    • Stronza
      Posted October 24, 2017 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

      “many men who are drawn to our ideas are also drawn—very disappointingly—to kooky conspiracy theories: run as fast as you can from anyone who wants to conjoin 9/11, GMO, vaccine and cosmological truth with, say, White Nationalism…”

      Those kooky conspiracy theories are no stupider than prowhites who shamelessly, with utter seriousness, describe their vision of the white race’s future success resulting from genetic manipulation/goofy forms of eugenics: space travel; colonizing other planets; circumventing natural laws, etc. More and more high technology is apparently where it’s at, all we’re good for – indeed, our transcendent Purpose. Humanoids passing as real people, androids twiddling their thumbs dreaming up the next big project.

  5. Mia
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article, thank you for writing this. I will have to start loving our sheep and prepare myself to be a good shepherd.

  6. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    White Liberals (better : white anti-Whites) should be expelled from white countries to the Third World, where they can live with their POCs (“pets of color”).

  7. Erika
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Can we not distinguish sheep worthy of being saved and sheep not worthy of being saved?

    White Anti-Whites, although they are still part of our flock of sheep, still harbour enough
    agency to be held responsible for their thoughts and actions. And even disregarding the
    moral dimension for a moment, by their being Anti-White they are exhibiting traits that make
    them too dangerous at worst and worthless at best as members of a consciously white society.

    Divide et impera, divide and conquer, is another famous proverb attributed to the Romans. Would
    a strategy aiming at securing a white ethno-state not be well-served by trying to pit different
    Anti-Whites against each other? Let California secede and watch on how White liberals get
    slaugthered by Latino immigrants

  8. Ronnie Waters
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    But, what constitutes a liberal these days? Free trade? Endless wars? Racial tolerance? We should at least be prepared for a scenario where WNs become the New Left. As the demographics shift against us and the parties realign, we could find ourselves the anti-system. We have in recent history the blacks moving the Democrats and the Southern whites going republican.

    • nineofclubs
      Posted October 23, 2017 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

      An interesting thought, given that in many nations the (very) Old Left were once the WN’s.

      I find the concept of left and right to be increasingly useless as a descriptor of political orientation. It is confusing for the reasons you suggest – and more.

      It could be argued that the primary divide between those who favour ethno-nationalism and those who don’t is simply whether one’s outlook is national or global.

      Within the group who could be called nationalists, there are some who see nationality as an organic, extended family tree – and others who see it as adherence to the ‘‘approved’ principles or values espoused by the state. These latter are civic nationalists.

      To my mind, anyone adhering to the organic view of nationalism and seeking autonomy for their own ethno-nation is an ethno-nationalist.

      Even if they hold ‘liberal’ views on things like religion or abortion. Even if, like myself, they hold views on economics that would have been called ‘socialist’ in the past.

      Building a credible anti-establishment movement (becoming the New Left) will require a degree of unity around a basic program, or message. We should be as inclusive as possible with this program, without compromising the fundamental ideal of organic nationalism.

      • Sin City Milla
        Posted October 23, 2017 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

        With all the fruitless attempts to find a ‘MidEast peace process’ among ethnicities in the US, n decades of failure to equalize IQ scores, n in view of recent discoveries in genetic differences among populations, I’m tempted to go with Disraeli: All is race; there is nothing that is not race.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Posted October 23, 2017 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

      “Liberals” today are Cultural Marxists.

  9. Tom Rogers
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    The author of the article is fundamentally wrong.

    The public are not sheep and they are not stupid or unknowing. The reason the public appear not to agree with us is that they have to survive socially. Their apparent indifference is the manifestation of a normal and natural survival instinct. Most ordinary white people want to vote for Nationalist parties, but Nationalists have to meet them halfway by organising political parties that they can comfortably vote for. The public naturally want their voting choices to reflect back well on them. This is understandable. They don’t want to vote for idiocy and ineptitude.

    A metapolitical strategy means (or should mean) establishing a ‘meta’: a means of transference of our core principles into proposed political action on issues that affect the public on a day-to-day level. This is not an abandonment of parochial Nationalist issues, it is the communication of them on the public’s wavelength; it is not the abandonment of core Nationalist principles, it is the realisation of them through real issues.

    The Trump presidential campaign was metapolitical. UKIP is metapolitical. Neither of those political movements is explicitly nationalist in the sense that we would accept, but both are capable of actuating nationalist policies and positions. That’s metapolitics. Until we adopt that approach to metapolitics and establish political operations just to the right of these that can capture power, even if only at a very petty level initially, the general public in white countries may as well remain an alien race to us. Not the White Race, as such, but the inhabitants of another planet.

    That is not to say that electoral politics will lead inexorably to a white ethno-state, but it must be an important part of the struggle and to abandon that component was, at the very least, foolish.

    I also wish people in the Movement would move away from coining teenage Americanisms like ‘normie’ and ‘red-pilled’ and ‘cucked’, etc. There’s the obvious point that it is divisive and insulting to use these terms, and therefore impolitic, but apart from that, those terms are not an accurate reflection of reality. There is no such thing as a ‘normie’. It is actually just a sneering insult of perfectly fine people who just might not have the same level of knowledge or insight as a Nationalist and may not share our parochial concerns. It’s disgraceful and can only separate us from the very people – normative people – whose interests we are supposed to be defending. And if somebody called me a ‘cuck’, it would probably be the last thing they ever said.

    Fundamentally, our task is not to ‘educate’ the public, but to gain and maintain power. To win power, we need to radiate the kind of qualities that will give the public sufficient confidence in us that they can say to their neighbours, friends and work colleagues: “I voted Nationalist this time round”. The BNP got very close to that point, and in some parts of Britain, reached it. So why was the BNP abandoned? And who are these people who keep telling us that electoral politics doesn’t work for Nationalists? No doubt they will come on here to ‘educate’ me.

    To believe that you must ‘educate’ people puts you in an unattractive and ineffectual position from the start. The public need us, but they want us to solve problems, not teach them new tricks.

    • Tom Rogers
      Posted October 24, 2017 at 4:36 am | Permalink

      Then you have not understood what I have just said.

  10. Glen
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    I’m past the “good shepherd” stage.

    Twenty-two years ago I discovered the truth re race and nationalism. Naively, I thought others would be as excited as I was and motivated, perhaps, to do “a little more” in their lives to pass the truth along. Nothing worked.

    The shepherd has power over his flock. We have nothing. We are less than nothing.

    I despise Derbyshire, but he’s right about one thing: We [whites] are doomed.

    In time all will come to the same conclusion as I have. Not all at once, of course. Optimists will continue to grasp straws and rationalize as they are chased off the Internet, doxxed, suffer unemployment, lose family, are imprisoned, and eventually, executed. Why? There is no guarantee the Sun will rise in the morning.

    Not everything that can be done has been done. Still, everything that can be said about what to do has been said.

    • Voryn Illidari
      Posted October 23, 2017 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

      This type of toxic and worthless thinking should be entirely disregarded. The fact that there even IS an Alt-Right is proof enough that we are making strides and the Overton Window is shifting in our favor.
      What is the point of even commenting on this site if you are such a negative Nancy? The desire to spread black-pilled thinking about our race’s future, and to try and present yourself as more enlightened for thinking that way, is more disgusting than choosing to be a sheep.

      • Glen
        Posted October 24, 2017 at 8:15 am | Permalink

        No offense, but how long have you been around? The existence of extremely tenuous, Internet-based reading clubs recently re-branded as “The Alt-Right” is meaningless. Race realism was stronger in the sixties.

        Shepherds have power. We have none. We are less than our fellows. For fear of expulsion we don’t meet for coffee at local restaurants.

        History is behind me. Nevertheless, I am here because the Sun may not rise tomorrow: meaning, someone might successfully implement or articulate a new idea. I think you are here for the same reason. I am pessimistic about the prospect. You are not. My pessimism discourages you because our situation is precarious and you fear I am right.

        Audacious Epigone’s latest piece should inspire you:

        Me: Meh. You: Oh joy, Whites will be electoral kangz for several more generations! More of muh Overton Window, frog memes, and 5th Dimensional Chess (beats the hell out of boots on ground)!

        • Joseph Walsh
          Posted October 24, 2017 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

          Thanks for your refreshing comments Glen. I’ve been involved in the ‘movement’ for the survival of the White race for nearly 13 years now and, while I still want the White race to survive, I now have a much more resigned acceptance of the extinction of the White race than I did when I started out. It is not the end of the world. The Universe will go on without us, we are not the be-all end-all of existence.

          That said, I’m certain there is no way for us whites to survive without the use of violence. Everything else has been tried. Marches, protests, speeches, voting, conferences, books, essays, music, websites-while all necessary, none of them affect the necessary change. Every species survival depends on two fundamental things: reproduction and killing. In short, white women are not having enough white children and white men are not killing their enemies. Either enough white males will kill the Jews, Blacks, Arabs etc. that occupy our lands within the next 100 years or we shall perish. If we are too cowardly to shed the blood of our enemies unlike our forefathers who went out and conquered the globe, then we will not survive. Cowardly species don’t get to survive. It would be an injustice if they did.

          I know the racialist movement has looked for a way out that doesn’t involve violence, some easier way that doesn’t involve personal risk or inconvenience. But there is no other way. It is through the hard route of self-sacrifice, prison sentences and bloodshed that our race will endure into the future.

          Because so many of our people want to go extinct or simply don’t care, our situation is extremely difficult. The odds are against us and the chance we will survive is small. However there is still a chance and it is not certain we will go extinct. It is not over until it’s over. That alone should give us all reason to continue.

          • Voryn Illidari
            Posted October 24, 2017 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

            Yea, black-pilled talk is so very “refreshing.” It’s a good thing you and Glen “refreshed” us all with your doomsday prophecies. You and he should go put on black lispstick, wear black Jenko jeans, and listen to Goth music….just stay out of everyone else’s way while they work to save the White race. This is a very tangible goal.

          • jbwilson24
            Posted October 24, 2017 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

            “I’m certain there is no way for us whites to survive without the use of violence”

            I’m not so negative on the European peoples surviving as distinct ethnic groups. Even if only 5% of us survive in that fashion, that is still more of us than existed during the 1500s. The Jews (whatever you may think of them) survived for millennia, and there is no reason to believe that a certain subset of whites cannot do the same.

            Now, will we keep our ancestral homelands? Not the western ones, at least. They’ll be overrun with brown third worlders and africans in short order.

            Lastly, wise to keep in mind something that bruce schneier said recently. Non-nation state actors will eventually have the power to create nuclear weaponry. If you feel powerless, you might think that at some point there will be enough non-sheep left around angry at the loss of their homelands to put together a nasty little surprise. better sorched earth than the UK (etc) taken over by Pakis. Drop one on Delhi and watch the fun.

        • Voryn Illidari
          Posted October 24, 2017 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

          You’re right. Who am I to question the learned Boomer who has “seen things,” right?
          Mocking the different tools and staples of the Alt-Right and calling for boots on the ground betrays your age. Perhaps it also betrays your bitterness at my generation’s successes in bringing White nationalism more into the mainstream. You guys couldn’t do it with your pamphlets and your marches, so you’re angry that we have been able to do it with that Internet you’ve been hearing so much about. I mean no disrespect towards the likes of Rockwell, Duke, Metzger or any of the others, of course. Duke keeps fighting the good fight, and I’m sure Rockwell would be too if he were alive, whereas you seem to have punched out and want others to think you are somehow wise for doing so.
          You’re right that people were more racially conscious back in your day. The fact that people like Spencer, Johnson, and Anglin have been able to bring racialist thought into the mainstream again means that they had to accomplish something greater than you could have. They have been up against more than you were. So either make a contribution, write a check, or zip it

          • Voryn Illidari
            Posted October 24, 2017 at 8:43 pm | Permalink

            Just to be clear, we need boots on the ground, to be sure. But the other tactics of spreading our messages are just as important. Were it not for memes and 4-Chan, there would likely not be anywhere near as many young men on the Alt-Right

    • Peter
      Posted October 24, 2017 at 9:18 am | Permalink

      Glen, I agree with your view and appreciate its clarity and uncompromisingness because only that way can we really see where we stand. However, to my own surprise, I think there is a solution, and don´t yawn: it´s the financial system. Why? Because the present financial system allows the Jews to siffon off and concentrate power (money is an equivalent to energy, energy = power), therefore, the answer is a decentralized monetary system with local currencies (there are e.g. already various approaches with time banks in the US and elsewhere). Power problem solved, problem of self-determination solved, White Genocide problem solved. Didn´t we always know that there is something with Jews and money? Turns out it´s the very lever with which to end their scheme.

      • ster plaz
        Posted October 24, 2017 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

        Peter, I’ve also come to the conclusion that all the jews do to this nation centers around having enough money to do it. And that in turn comes from siphoning off wealth via the central banking system known (misnomered) as the Fed Reserve.

        With that wealth the jews were able to get ahold of all news media and use it to selectively present narrative to the American people (German Nazi super evil [[[[[must fight WW2 against them]]]]]). Also, the jews use it to get ahold of all literature/art/music critics/reviews and make sure those represent jewish ideals/interests; Saul Bellow, that Portnoy’s complaint porno novel from the 1960s, and many others. A region of the USA that was still race conscious (American South) is portrayed as dumb/redneck/hillbilly/inbred; first by that Lil Abner comic strip and then TV/movies when those came into widespread use. Blatantly unconstitutional shenanigans by the US Supr Ct (heavy dose of jews on it) that rampaged through our constitutionally federated Republic are portrayed as somehow legit and thus legal. When they are not.

        Same kinds of things happened in entertainment media. Negroes foisted onto White America in sports/music/etc; more jew ideals/interests presented as Americana.

        Academia is controlled with this ill gotten gain by the jews for more of this cultural hijacking.

        Before Americans knew it, by say 1970, their whole culture had been hijacked by jews. And even if the news media, the entertainment media and academia are losing money on their own, the jews keep them alive with contributions of the wealth they rake off of productive activity in America. jews fund activities that either help someone other than White people but also ones that openly attack Whites. And Whites just sit there and let their wealth they created (and a jew sat there doing nothing to help) be raked off by jews (Fed Reserve and Wall street “fund” markets) to be used this way; helping fund their own destruction.

        Problem is, I can’t imagine the jews, with the hold they have over the three branches of the fed gov’t, are going to sit still and allow regional/state gov’ts to use their own forms of money and not the Fed Reserve debt slips of paper. I am sure the jews will be outraged and instigate the fed gov’t to cripple and even end the alternative forms of money. They know as you and I do that the Fed Reserve is the lynch pin of their control over America.

        • Peter
          Posted October 24, 2017 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

          ster plaz, happy you share that view.

          I can’t imagine the jews, with the hold they have over the three branches of the fed gov’t, are going to sit still and allow…

          It works the following way:
          a)it´s a poverty project, applied in economically deserted areas on the margins, politically impossible to object
          b)from there it will spread, and then will be too big to stop

      • Glen
        Posted October 24, 2017 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

        “Because the present financial system allows the Jews to siffon off and concentrate power (money is an equivalent to energy, energy = power), therefore, the answer is a decentralized monetary system with local currencies (there are e.g. already various approaches with time banks in the US and elsewhere).” – Peter

        Peter, the idea is great and I’ve discussed it on numerous Internet forums. The first problem is the matter’s not up for discussion by the mainstream (and never will be) until the regime falls.

        The second problem is there is no free association. We can’t meet in coffee shops to discuss the idea without bringing George (the White Zionist and his East Asian bang-bang girl), Juan, and Tyrone along. Once George realizes the idea undermines his Ea$y Money lifestyle and Juan/Ty realize we’re planning a future without them, then we’re doxxed and the game is up. Back to Sean and Tucker. Or to the basement with a bottle of alcohol.

        The third problem is the law. The “below radar” implementation of local currency is illegal. Not a problem with genuine risk-takers. A huge problem for family men dealing with non-vetted others. Furthermore, those promoting the idea can’t practice what they preach. Necessity forces them to exercise greater fealty to the law than the (((law))) does, for the (((law))) has greater resources and controls the social contract (as you’ve implied). The (((law))) will come after them, manufacture charges, and lock them up with Tyrone’s brothers for 10+ years. Can you imagine what the (((law))) would do to practitioners operating “below radar”? I certainly can.

        For most of us the end game is mixed/zero great-grandchildren.

        • Peter
          Posted October 24, 2017 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

          Glen, again, I fully agree with and appreciate your uncompromising analysis. However… not sure if you read my response commentary above dealing with a detail of the below-radar approach. Well in any case that´s all I´ve got… and future will show if it cuts it or not. In any case glad that you recognize the monetary approach… IMO that´s really going to the relevant roots so much more than any other, certainly well-intended, approaches (I don´t really want to go into more details here for “obvious” reasons… I write it to share a path that gives me hope, to those who, with very much justification, see the situation as hopeless).

  11. Apeneck Sweeney
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    I like the spirit of this article, but it suggests nothing that hasn’t been tried a thousand times before. Love? It’s actions that make a difference, not an emotion. In any case, even the most cursory examination shows that, despite centuries of Christian blather to the contrary, it’s not love that rules this world in which the vast majority of creatures meet an end both painful and bloody, but hatred and lies. Foremost among these, and also of Christian origin, are the lies that all men are brothers, and that they are “equal”.

    Too much of the racial right consists of dreaming up imaginary solutions to real problems. This makes me believe that such dreamers aren’t serious. They’re merely temporizing, distracting themselves while the extinction of their race proceeds apace. It’s not to recommend any particular course of action when I observe that human beings show they are serious about something only through violence. If Christ hadn’t been violently crucified, he’d have been forgotten, only another traveling magician. If the negro, or for that matter if Isis, were not violent, nobody would take them seriously. Likewise with the American Civil War, which enshrined the lie of racial equality into law and public policy. Those changes were written into the Constitution with blood, and they won’t be erased without more blood. I’ll believe things are really starting to change, and that there is a white racial movement worthy of the name, when the situation heats up.

  12. Jud Jackson
    Posted October 23, 2017 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Nice Article.

    I do take issue with your statement about Bertrand Russell, however. Yes, his politics were kind of dumb (See the chapter on Russell in Paul Johnson’s Intellectuals). However, he was great philosopher. His work in Epistemology, Philosophy of Language (Theory of Descriptions and Theory of Types), and Philosophy of Mind (Russell claimed late in life that when a neuro-surgeon operates on someone’s brain, what he actually sees is a piece of his own brain), and the problem of Universals are pathbreaking and important.

  13. Dante marotta
    Posted October 24, 2017 at 1:40 am | Permalink

    I am convinced Europeans are waking up and beginning to take our own side, Look at European leaders like Orban or even Vaclav Klaus who speak just as we do out in the public eye and it’s not just the Visegrad 4 but leaders all over Europe. Central and Eastern Europe is home to racially/ethnically aware publics and parties of the same position and slowly that is happening in Western Europe too, Nationalist or Nationalist inspired parties emerging in spite of the msm propaganda against it. The same can be glimpsed in the European Diasporas, Words like racist are losing the power to stifle open and honest debate. Europeans are waking up

  14. Jaego
    Posted October 24, 2017 at 2:09 am | Permalink

    Embrace Elitism. Love your sheep but protect them from the wolves. They’re too dumb and/or weak to fend for themselves.

    Another theory: Mass education has separated us from our instincts. It’s much easier to move your arm than to explain how you do it. As Chuang Tzu said, Once someone asked the centipede how he managed his hundred legs. The centipede not only couldn’t answer, he couldn’t walk anymore either. This has what’s been done to Whites. And yes, of course it was on purpose. The propaganda was right on hand to fill the wound with poison. We were enabled to get up and walk after a fashion – but only towards our own extinction.

  15. Sepp
    Posted October 24, 2017 at 6:27 am | Permalink

    Earlier in 2017, several conservative scholars and intellectuals drafted an affirmation of Europe and her native peoples.

    Recently they released it in multiple languages.

    The Paris Statement

    A Europe We Can Believe In

    • Dante marotta
      Posted October 25, 2017 at 1:01 am | Permalink

      Thanks for the link.

  16. Neptune
    Posted October 24, 2017 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    There’s some documentary by Stephen Hawking in which he is in the middle of some sort of physics philosophy and discusses all the possible capacities of a goldfish in in a goldfish bowl including what it sees and how it perceives the world, and then tries to relate it to how humans perceive the universe for some sort of demonstrative purpose. I was surprised at the level of the thoughtfulness that he was able to imagine a goldfish had even though I know he was just using it to illustrate a point, but I think in general what it shows is that really smart people tend to treat other people as though they are also very smart. This becomes a problem when it comes to politics because if they are willing to project such intelligence onto a tiny goldfish think how much more they are willing to project onto the typical normie or black in a ghetto. I think this is why a lot of super high IQ people like Einstein or Stephen Hawking have naively liberal attitudes. Just as having an IQ above 130 or an INTP personality sometimes impedes social skills, especially if the person’s IQ is considerably higher than 130, if a person has an IQ of 150 or higher it would seem to be likely to incapacitate them for sensible political thought.

    What’s even worse is that really bright people often spend their time in sheltered environments or among other bright people such as in the university or some demanding profession, and hence the aphorism “Ivy Tower” as a description of their naivety.

  17. Fnord
    Posted October 25, 2017 at 4:40 am | Permalink

    Just to comment on the brief part about my Heimat: we, the Germans, don’t want to die and we won’t. Believe me, we’re just regaining our conciousness and taking a deep breath. Of course there is the fifth or sixth of my people, as everywhere in the West, who are hoplessly pozzed and beyond any help, but nobody thought that becoming oneself again will be without casualties.

  18. Mark Miller
    Posted October 31, 2017 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    One of my favorite authors, thanks for another gem and for putting your finger on a major conundrum: it’s tough to fall on your sword for a cause whose cohort (at least a majority) is so contemptible in their delusions/virtue signaling/cowardice.

    But let’s say that, like a suicidal bridge jumper having second thoughts halfway through the fall, the West awakenings in time to avert the worst. Or that the end stage of Western liberalism in which we find ourselves today is rolled back substantially.

    What then? What will we have achieved by rewinding the dialectic? Black Pigeon made a compelling case that we would simply end up in the same position again, that our Enlightenment legacy and all that it entailed (universal suffrage, democracy uber alles, religiously fueled equalism) will bring us back to the same point.

    I’m a fan of Nietzschean recurrence as a thought experiment, but intentionally reproducing failure is still insane and I don’t see how the West will square this circle. Western liberalism almost certainly has left it’s imprimatur on the population genomes (those ovine qualities).

    At this point in life, I can afford some outcome independent behavior, and I will continue to support ethnonationalist aspirations in the West, but I’ve also made peace with the idea that the torch of civilization may be passing back to the Orient.

  19. Antiochus
    Posted November 1, 2017 at 7:38 am | Permalink

    I completely understand the defeatist sentiment of those who have been around for a while. While I’m not old (34), I’ve been actively involved and following for years. I have pictures of myself with matt Hale at rallies I went to I high school. I think we’ve made a world of progress, and refuse to throw in the towel, but one cannot help feeling disillusioned and respond to our races lack of vital spirit and suicidal behavior. How much is can we blame on the enemy controlling and engineering this reality, versus our own traitorous elite and our people allowing it to happen by not fighting back. Time is not on our side and I’m afraid a race can only make so many mistakes before it falls into extinction. With a parasite on our back and an alien religion that has poisoned us as much as capitalism or liberalism it feels were fighting with so many weights and arms tied, and blindfolded. Violence is the only way out, but it must be state directed, and there is zero chance of us capturing the state, Donald trump aside. Hence our conundrum. Collapse, post peak oil, epidemics in the third world, ww3, and other externalities may potentially help if they come to pass but right now the metapolitical strategy seems to be the best. I don’t knock others though because we have the problem fully diagnosed and a million solutions without the power to implement them. Hopefully that critical mass of people who can initiate revolution comes soon because the window of opportunity is closing fast. I hope we go down with a fight at least. Like the Roman who holds his line out of duty despite the battle being lost is our call. Its hard to maintain resolve over the years when so few are worth saving..silence and resignation and certainly comes after a life of dedication. Our race can’t say it wasn’t warned.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace