Counter-Currents
On Vetting & Entry into a White Ethnostate, Part III
Spencer J. Quinn2,635 words
Part 3 of 3. For Part 1 of this series, click here; for Part 2, click here.
For this last installment, we focus on what to do with applicants of good character who for any number of reasons failed the criteria for entry into a white ethnostate. This process is called “Racial Vetting” (point B5 on the flowchart from Part 2) and deals almost exclusively with individuals who are:
- non-white, quarter-white, or half-white and half-black;
- under a certain age; or
- unmarried or married to a non-white, or at least half-black and married to a white.
A person who passes Racial Vetting will be awarded Minimal Citizenship regardless of their race. Racial Vetting is a way for ethnostate authorities to reserve the right to retain a small number of non-whites for the sake of national or cultural interest, or simply for the sake of recompense or gratitude in the case of “allies of color” who truly deserve it due to their service or sacrifice. Of course, demographics would play an important role, with criteria being stricter in cases where whites have less than than an agreed-upon majority percentage (say, ninety percent), and looser when they have more. The criteria I present might be considered moderate in terms of strictness.
The main thrust of Racial Vetting is about, as Peter Brandt said in the film Moneyball, “getting things down to one number.” The process by which we can do this is fairly simple from a statistician’s standpoint, but may require some explanation for the layperson. The Racial Vetting process includes four tiers, each of which contains a number of categories. An applicant is graded on various scales within each of these categories, producing a weighted mean based on different weights for each tier.
A weighted mean allows us to assign more importance, or weight, to some tiers and less to others. When you calculate a normal mean, the formula is simply to divide the sum of all the data values by the number of data values. For weighted means, however, we first multiply each data value by its weight (which increases or decreases based on importance). Then we sum the products and divide by the sum of the weights. We do this, in effect, whenever we derive a normal mean; we simply assume the weight per data value is 1.
I have decided that attaining a weighted mean of 0.50 across all categories should be enough to pass Racial Vetting. 0.35 should be enough if you are the spouse of someone who has also passed Racial Vetting or otherwise attained citizenship. Any score lower than 0.35 before a government or military intervention score (mentioned below in Tier 1) will be grounds for disqualification.
See below for an overview of Racial Vetting done up in Excel. The area encircled by a red line (cells C4-C16) is where to put the raw scores for each applicant per category. Cell B20 is where an applicant’s final score, his “one number,” will appear.
Tier 1: The top tier has a weight of 1 and only two categories: Race and Government/Military approval. For Race, a person scores 0.25 per white grandparent, 0 per non-European white grandparent, and -0.25 per non-white grandparent. Most applicants will score well below zero for this category and start off at a big disadvantage. Note that by not docking them for their race, we give non-European whites a boost in an effort to facilitate entry for truly exceptional people of this kind. The maximum a person can score in the Race category is 0.25, since most people with more than one white grandparent can avoid Racial Vetting to begin with.
Government/Military Approval allows the ethnostate’s leadership to put its thumb on the scale for whatever reason. Suppose there is an exceptional applicant whom someone in government knows will pose a problem. Suppose there is someone bound to fail Racial Vetting that a high-ranking military officer wants to bring in at all costs. It’s impossible to predict these things, but I think allowing for the option ahead of time would be wise, since it is natural for leaders to use their influence to get what they want, anyway. Most applicants will receive a 0 for this category, with the ethnostate leadership showing no interest one way or the other. If the leadership is positively inclined, it could award the applicant a 1, which would be enough to make a difference in many but not all cases. According to Racial Vetting, even the government cannot salvage a true disaster of an applicant. On the other hand, a veto, at -3, will be enough to shut the door on anyone.
Tier 2: The second-highest tier has a weight of 0.75 and includes White Character References, STEM, IQ, and Political Value.
An applicant must have a minimum of five recommendations from fully-vetted whites who are not in the applicant’s immediate family. A 1 is awarded if this is the case, and a -1 if not. For STEM, we determine if a person’s line of work falls into the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math umbrella. If so, there are a range of values assigned to various professions. For example, an engineer would get a 1 for the STEM category, and, with weighting, ultimately score 0.75 (1 x 0.75). A dentist, on the other hand, would score a 0.75 and receive a weighted score of 0.5625 (0.75 x 0.75).
For IQ, assuming we would have a quick and accurate way of assessing it, a simple range is in order. Anyone who scores 130 or more gets a 1. Anyone between 110 and 129 gets 0.5. Anyone between 100 and 109 gets 0, and the rest get -1. The basic idea here is to peel as much technical talent from the non-white population as we can afford during a time when we would likely need it for our survival.
Political Value, otherwise known as the “Huggy Bear Clause,” is assigned to “allies of color” who have honorably served the cause in one way or another. Such people will earn a 1. Everyone else gets a 0. Its name is based on the streetwise black character Huggy Bear from the 1970s television police drama Starsky and Hutch. Huggy often infiltrated the black community, gathering information for the police, the original ally of color. If an applicant earns a 1 in this category, that automatically waives any monetary payment Racial Vetting requires (see Tier 4 below). So, if an ally of color can pass Racial Vetting, he can enter for free.
Tier 3: This tier includes some more subjective criteria and has a weight of 0.5.
People who work in technical non-STEM fields such as nursing or computer programming can also be of great use to a white ethnostate. So are people who are fluent in languages of interest and can work as instructors, translators, or spies. Such people will score between 0.5 and 1 in this category. Also, if a person has a score in this category, he cannot have one in the STEM category, and vice versa. A person can be either STEM or technical non-STEM, but not both.
Net worth is another consideration. This assumes that the more a person is worth, the more likely the person will possess the connections or financial skills that can help a white ethnostate when it needs it most. Another is military experience and cultural value. If an applicant has a list of military honors to his name, this must be considered, especially during a time of war. Further, a popular non-white of great cultural value can serve both to raise morale at home as well as to deflect criticism of the white ethnostate abroad.
Tier 4: The bottom tier has a weight of 0.25 and concerns the amount of money an applicant is willing to offer the ethnostate, the applicant’s English proficiency, and the length of time the applicant is willing to work or serve in the military to attain minimal citizenship.
In the first case, we award freeloaders an instant -1. Someone with less than ten thousand dollars to give gets a 0, and the score goes up by increments of .1 from there. The highest a person can score is a 4 if they contribute twenty million dollars to the ethnostate. The idea here, of course, is that during its birth pangs, a white ethnostate will be strapped for cash, and the more it can extort from applicants the better. As mentioned above, if an ally of color can pass Racial Vetting with the maximum value in this category, then he can enter for free.
For English proficiency, an applicant gets maximum benefit for being fluent and the maximum demerit for not. This should apply for native speakers as much as it should for those for whom English is not their first language.
The final category simply gives an applicant a chance to get past the minimum weighted mean through voluntary sweat and toil. For example, agreeing to work three years for a nominal wage in the service of the state will award an applicant a 0.6 in this category. Being multiplied by its weight of 0.25 lands the applicant with a weighted score of 0.15. Often, the Labor/Service category will be juggled with the Financial Contribution category so that an applicant can choose to either pay more and work less, or work more and pay less, in order to gain entry.
And that’s about it. See below for the mathematical formulas used in the Racial Vetting process, which anyone with spreadsheet software can emulate and, presumably, improve upon.
Case Studies
As we did last time, I will offer several case studies which will give a feel for what Racial Vetting can do. The first three will be for real people and the last two for hypothetical ones. In all cases, these applicants will have garnered the five character references from whites needed to score a 1 in that category.
Case Study 1: Retired black basketball star Charles Barkley. From all accounts, Barkley is a nice enough guy who from time to time likes to spout common sense about current events, to the chagrin of the mainstream media. I find it hard not to nurse a mild appreciation for him, and, as the “Round Mound of Rebound,” he was a legitimate basketball superstar in his day. However, assuming that Barkley has no STEM or technical skills, but possesses an IQ in the 100 to 109 range, a net worth of over ten million dollars, and a willingness to give and work to the maximum in order to join, he would still fail Racial Vetting, scoring a 0.29. As this is below the minimum weighted mean of 0.35, he wouldn’t even qualify if he had a spouse who gained acceptance or if the government or military intervened in his favor.
Case Study 2: Famous black, anti-Islamic author and activist Ayaa Hirsi Ali. Of course, given her work resisting Islam, Ali would score a 1 in the Political Value category. Assuming Ali knows two languages of interest other than English, has an IQ between 110 and 129, a net worth of just over one million dollars, and a willingness to dedicate five years of service to the ethnostate, she would score a 0.43, well above the minimum 0.35 weighted mean for a spouse to gain entry. Her husband, historian Niall Ferguson (who is white), would likely make it to Minimal or Partial Citizenship on his own, and Ali, as a spouse, would get credit for that.
Case Study 3: Conservative author and blogger Michelle Malkin. Because Malkin is not married to a white man, it will be assumed that her spouse would face higher odds of passing Racial Vetting than she would. Therefore, passing Racial Vetting would be extremely difficult for her. Unlike Ayaa Hirsi Ali, she would have to earn the full 0.50 on her own. Of course, she would get a 1 in the Political Value category for her anti-Left and anti-anti-white track record. Assuming she has similar statistics as Ali, she still would be 0.07 short of 0.50. Only the government or the military could make the crucial difference in her case.
Hypothetical Case Study 1: A high-IQ East Asian scientist or mathematician. Those of us who have tech backgrounds know plenty of people like this: polite and industrious (at least when they are in the minority), with few interests beyond work, but poor English skills. Such people would essentially fail Racial Vetting unless they have government approval, military experience, and/or can throw some serious money around. For example, even with such a person getting 1’s in the STEM, IQ, and Net Worth categories, and even if he volunteers to work and pay the maximum, he won’t get past a 0.35. For such an individual, even government or military intervention wouldn’t do the trick unless he also has military experience or is proficient, at the very least, in an art or sport at the national level. Very few people of this type will make it into a white ethnostate.
Hypothetical Case Study 2: A Hispanic military general with impeccable service and pro-white credentials. The assumption here is that if a person serves as a leader in the US military with distinction, he will garner government intervention and be considered an ally of color. Assuming such a person has an IQ in the 110 to 129 range and can speak Spanish (a language of interest), he would score a 0.53 and pass Racial Vetting with little difficulty.
The Hispanic Question: In most cases, a person’s race will be easily determined, either visually or by consulting the person’s genealogy. In the absence of genetic testing, this should be enough. In the case of Hispanics, however, it may not be. Many Hispanics share a Spanish heritage and might be as white as anyone. Because their last names may end in a ‘z’ and all their grandparents are from Mexico or Argentina doesn’t necessarily mean they are not white. This is something ethnostate authorities will have to consider if genetic testing is not available.
The Question of Miscegenation: Of course, in a white ethnostate there should be anti-miscegenation laws which would favor a white majority. These might not be as simple as they might seem. For example, a non-white caught in sexual relations with a white should face immediate deportation (along with any progeny produced by such a union), and the white person involved should be punished somehow. On the other hand, non-white-on-non-white miscegenation (for example, black-on-Asian) should be accepted. Someone who is half-white and not half-black should be allowed to interbreed in any direction, with the understanding that unions with non-whites will guarantee perpetual Minimal Citizenship for them and their children. Someone who is at least three-quarters non-white in a white ethnostate can never have offspring that will rise above Minimal Citizenship.
This will create a permanent non-white underclass, which will discourage immigration to a white ethnostate.
So if the ethnostate is opposed to miscegenation, why is it so tolerant of applicants who interbreed? Well, it is and it isn’t. If a black-white couple were to somehow gain acceptance, so would their children. But being half-black, these children will not be able to take whites as spouses without facing deportation. Further, the parents would not be allowed to have more children (since that would be miscegenation) without also facing deportation. Basically, I think we should protect all newcomers from ex post facto jurisprudence. But once a white ethnostate is formed and everyone is made aware of the laws, then ex post facto no longer applies.
Final Thoughts on the Vetting Algorithm and Racial Vetting
None of the decisions made in the Vetting Algorithm and Racial Vetting should be onsidered final. I put a lot of thought into them, but I’m sure there is much I failed to consider. As I said before, this is a beginning, not the end. If we do ever get to the point at which a white ethnostate becomes a reality, I hope people will remember this article and the conversations it engendered and make decisions that will be the most beneficial for the white race while being as just and fair as possible to everyone else.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
23 comments
Excellent concept, but can you expand on the formula for Black ancestry to Jewish ancestry? TBH, I’d consider it more of a threat in terms of infiltration (Jewish ancestry being less obviously apparent)
a more concise vetting procedure: a White ethnostate should be restricted to Whites
Yes, if our reach does not exceed our grasp, then what’s a heaven for? We are not the less to aim for what we want. And if they don’t want it, then are they White Nationalists at all?
How to do it? Wait and be ready for the End of the Aeon, a catastrophic collapse of the World System. Then be ready to make it real with any means necessary.
this is a joke?
No.
If we had the power to make a 90% White Nation, we would also have the power to make a 100% one. You have to explain why you don’t want that. Humanism and Multiculturalism are pathogens that lead to Globalism. If you had said .01% of people like Malkin and Ali, that would be one thing – something like Plato’s noble guests. But 10%? That’s huge and bizarre.
Can we have an honorary exclusionary clause for white public officials and even cops who have turned on the alt-right at recent events.
I appreciate the amount of work you put into this. Most in the WN movement fall into one of two categories: either they avoid talking about the proposed ethnostate in any detail, leaving it as an almost allegorical “shining city on the hill” or they trivialize the process needed to create it with bravado of “then we kick out all the non-whites”. Spencer falls into the first category, and too many to name into the second. No one else has sat down to deal with some of the hard issues arising from the desire to ethnically cleanse a large area making up a new country.
But now reading this 3 part article, does this seem remotely feasible? To me it absolutely does not, even sort of imagining lots of change over the next 50 years, I just can’t see this.
It also clarifies the impossibility of those WNs who want to reclaim the entire land mass of the USA. As the process outlined here makes clear possibly 100 million or more people currently here would require exile. Logistically that seems entirely impossible. (Canada, for instance, has 30 million citizens, so it would be like moving 3X the entire population of that country.)
Similar thoughts arise for the States of the former Confederacy attempting this. The problem is not only that the 20 Million blacks who are mostly seventh, eighth or more generations in states like Georgia are going to forcefully resist, but assuming the resulting war is won there is no obvious place that will agree to accept 20 or 30 Million refugees.
It is simply an unimaginable scale, at or even beyond the levels of displacement that even WW2 created. Thus, the main outcome of the exercise is illustrating the absurdity and futility of trying to implement something like this on a large scale. The only precursor that would make it feasible would be a continent-wide war, ala WW2.
One of the better slogans I’ve heard chanted at AltRight events is “no more brother wars”. A massive conflagration required to get to the point that everyone in some area is going to be subjected to the three part process would rival previous brothers wars in the death it brought. And don’t think that there will not be lots of whites on both sides. Civil War II, indeed it would be.
The fact that much of the AltRight movement is focused on something that, when given real scrutiny, appears both implausible and horrifying in it’s implications (continent wide brothers war required to achieve) is a weakness. Nazism without the swastikas isn’t any more appealing to most thinking white people than Nazism with.
It’s not surprising one of the other reactions was “is this a joke?”. Of course, I know it was intended quite seriously, but again, the main use of the exercise is demonstrating what a dead end this sort of “plan” is. It’s the intellectual equivalent of LARPing, and like dressing up as a Viking or something, while a fun pass-time, isn’t a viable occupation in real life.
Hi Joseph,
That’s quite a black pill you’re serving up there. There is an excellent chance you are correct. However, on the odd chance you’re not, there is my labor to consider. I had been batting around these ideas in my head for months now and it just felt right to get them all down in one place. Not LARPing. Just an honest effort at tackling a huge problem. I also have a hope that if in 50-100 years a WES does possibly come to fruition, someone will remember these articles and perhaps take some guidance from them. Otherwise, why else write?
But I see where you are coming from. Thanks.
With all this talk of pills people are going to think wns are all drug addicts.
So your counterproposal is basically “surrender and let them have it, and become pariahs in our own former nations?”
Why not use some sort of DNA analysis? I’m sure specialists in this field could develop a quick and dirty screen for a certain percentage of European ancestry. I believe Israel uses mitochondrial DNA to screen entrants. That would fulfill their entry requirements bc the criteria for being Jewish is to be born of a Jewish mother(mitochondrial DNA is passed from mother to all offspring). That wouldn’t be sufficient for a European ethnostate bc European mitochondrial DNA is so widespread.
Population genetics is a fascinating field, and I would recommend the book Seven Daughters of Eve by Brian Sykes as a fascinating and spiritually rewarding application of this technology to Europe. Supposedly we are all descended from seven ancient women, the seven daughters of eve. Also his Vikings saxons and celts is a similar exposition for the British isles, which will bring a surge of pride to those of us from Albion. He says we are mostly derived from the stone age Celtic migrants to England!
Sykes’ work is outdated nonsense. I recall I refuted it on one of my past blogs; unfortunately, I cannot find the reference. Anyway, you can find ghetto Negroes who are considered mitoDNA descendants of one of Sykes’ fantasy women. Who cares? That probably was the core of my argument: we need to look at the entire (distinctive) autosomal genome.
Again, we can be more concise: do you have four grandparents that derive from any of the native peoples of Europe? No problem. You don’t? Problem.
Ted,
I believe that a white ethnostate that is 90% white, 8% part-white-half-not black, and 2% other will be sufficient. As the for this last group, think of what a public relations coup it would be if we offered safe haven and limited citizenship for real allies of color? Remember also that the good character test will leave out the vast majority of non-whites.
Yes, I know it’s always a risk to do this. But I have faith in our people to handle it.
I certainly don’t want to live in a 10% non-White state. What’s the point? All the effort to reach 90% – you may as well get as close to 100% as possible. And how do you manage these percentages? What happens if the 10% becomes 15% or more over time? Or if the 10% becomes assimilated, which would shift the White genepool and phenotype. The cost/benefit ratio just isn’t there. Assimilating several thousand or so pro-White NECs or Hapas is doable in a nation of many millions of people. But 10% – even if many of these are part-White – is a significant fraction. That’s one in every ten people in a so-called ethnostate who is an alien. Again, why settle for that when the System would consider 90% just as unacceptable as 100%?
Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.
And he said unto his people, Behold the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we.
Come, let us deal wisely with them, lest they multiply and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us and so depart once having defeated us.
Exodus, 8-10
Why do u call it nonsense? Yeah I understand that mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosome don’t tell one much about oneself as an individual–only one person way way up in the family tree–but for a population it’s a fairly good indicator, I would think. If all the people in a region have a particular mitochondrial profile, the autosomal should not be far off in most cases. The “tribes” thing is fanciful, more a brilliant marketing ploy, but is fun just the same. I skipped this part of the book by the way!
I think Sykes’ power is in his lucid exposition of the science for the intelligent layperson, the historical/cultural intersection, and his ability to tell a good story. He’s a good writer. With seven daughters, it’s just intellectual adventure, the neanderthals, Heyerdahl, the Romanovs, so many world riddles solved in such a short spurt. For instance, have his basic conclusions on the British isles or Europe, I mean with regard to the founding genetics been shown wildly off base?
There is a little bit of
Ted, could you recommend a book or resource, even perhaps a textbook, to bring myself state of the art on this subject. I really find it enthralling.
even starting with the archives at Dienekes blog would be helpful
Yes, it’s implicit in my first comment that mitochondrial DNA wouldn’t be enough for Europeans, but it seems it would be possible to develop some sort of highly sensitive autosomal “chip” to screen people, that might even reveal the percentage European heritage.
What’s the point of creating a white ethno state and then allowing in somebody like Niall Ferguson who has dedicated his life working against us. Not on your nelly!!
Otherwise a good effort at working out a tricky problem.
Thanks, Sandy. I should have made it clearer in the article, but people like Ferguson would have passed the ‘Good Character’ test *before* any further vetting. The assumption here is that in the future, when faced with the reality of white ethnostate versus the dreadful alternative, people *like* Fergsuon would be red-pilled in a hurry and would be begging to enter the ethnostate. At that point, they would repudiate whatever they had said in the past.
But yes, if someone remains utterly hostile to the idea of a white ethnostate, then no entry for him. I don’t care how white he is.
This is where we are: we’re not even Free in our fantasies. How do we give this young man and all young men the strength to dream, and joy enough to dream true?
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment