Greg Johnson on Fash Britannia

7 comments

1. Pilleater says:

   December 18, 2016 at 3:58 pm

   Awesome podcast like always!

   Would you be interested to be on The Stark Truth?

   I sent you an email about it. I wasn’t so sure if I should post info hear. I know your a really busy person.

   We could figure out a future date.

   -pilleater

   0

   0

   1. Greg Johnson says:

      December 18, 2016 at 4:59 pm

      I can do that. Just have Robert contact me through FB.

      0

      0
2. Ethan says:

   December 19, 2016 at 11:25 am

   Wonderful podcast, Greg,

   Listening to your argument about how to proceed with critical inquiries into conspiratorial territory reminded me of Schopenhauer’s practical advice regarding the proper (effective) use of rhetoric.

   “In defending a thing, many people make the mistake of confidently advancing everything imaginable that can be said in its favour, and of mixing up what is true, half true, and merely plausible. But the false is soon recognized, or at any rate felt, and then casts suspicion even on the cogent and true that is advanced along with it. Therefore let us give the cogent and true pure and alone, and guard against defending a truth with grounds and arguments that are inadequate, and are thus sophistical, in so far as they are set up as adequate. For the opponent upsets these, and thus gains the appearance of having upset also the truth itself that is supported by them; in other words he brings forward argumenta ad hominem as argumenta ad rem” (The World As Will and Representation. Vol. 2. New York: Dover, 1958. 119).

   It’s sound advice, with universal application, and should be kept in mind when engaging in any form of controversy, whether the JQ or #Pizzagate—not because it is necessarily right, as Aristotle would say, but because it is rhetorically advantageous.

   0

   0
3. D-1mv3ryc32j says:

   December 19, 2016 at 5:09 pm

   If you hadn’t appeared and made a substantial contribution I would have stopped listening not very far in.

   These people are it seems very young and for the most part somewhat ignorant. I had listened to a couple of earlier episodes and was of the same opinion, I assumed matters would have improved after the hiatus.

   Their discussion of Alexander Blackman for example was quite unrelated to the actual facts of the case, see e.g.
   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sgt-alexander-blackman-the-case-for-and-against-the-royal-marine-who-murdered-a-wounded-unarmed-10508375.html

   I do not understand what purpose is intended to be secured by discussions of this type and at this level. WWS has remarked on this likewise regarding TRS generally
   http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-85857/TS-1136094.mp3

   If there are not available older, more knowledgeable and more experienced people able and willing to provide similar themed content then the audience would be better served imo by listening to the old Goyfire podcasts, the late Dr William Luther Pierce’s broadcast recordings and /or the Alex Linder book narrations at VNN / the computerised narrations of Ben Klassen’s principal books at archive.org.

   If however topicality and a British skew are considered necessary, then maybe a callout to one or other of the principal players at Morgoth’s Review? http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.co.uk/

   PS: CP is the sharpest knife in this particular drawer but even she coined without comment the mangled cliche’ of Kipling’s “When the Saxon Began to Hate” when in reality the poem never existed under that title and was about the modern English, WW1 and was bastardised presumably by Louis R. Beam Jr. (first sighted as far as I know in his ‘Essays of a Klansman’ [1983]).

   0

   0
4. R_Moreland says:

   December 20, 2016 at 12:57 am

   The situation we see in the Western world these decadent days is reminiscent of that in Europe during the Wars of Religion, from the early 16th century to the Peace of Westphalia (1648). There are two entirely different worldviews, one which is nationalist-racial (the Alt Right), and the other pathological-altruist (i.e., contemporary “liberalism”). And that’s the dilemma.

   The resemblance of liberalism to a demented version of Christianity has been remarked on elsewhere: the pathological guilt; the manichean division of the world into goodthinkers and heretics; the inquisitions against said heretics; the milleniarist social engineering to bring the (social) utopia on earth; the pious hypocrisy of preaching “love” but then hating anyone who does not tote the orthodox line on race; and the lemming-like children’s crusade, with sacrifices from Amy Biehl to Rotherham.

   It took better than a century for Europe to sort itself out last time around, and with some hard fighting, Look at the 30 Years War. But at least Europeans were not inviting in Muslims and Africans. In the 21st century we do not have the luxury of time. One thing to consider is that the situation is moving towards civil war, with perhaps only the Alt Right understanding that sch a war is even taking place. So we need to prepare accordingly.

   The Peace of Westphalia essentially divided Europe into Protestant and Catholic states. You lived where you wanted to practice your faith (to simplify things). Supposing a similar division were to be made between liberal and racial-national states?

   You mentioned Calexit. How long would a liberal California (or any other liberal state) last once it had seceded from the Union? Supposing the independent California government were (as it likely would) declare itself a “sanctuary state” and open up its borders to mass migration, no questions asked. It would not be very long before it would become an overpopulated third world running debacle, incapable of self-sustainment (among other things, California gets much of its water from external sources). All those granola crunchers wake up one day to find their Birkenstocks will not save them from endemic gang warfare, sexual assaults in public squares, and rolling utility brownouts.

   Or maybe that is the end game of the hostile elites. Some upper tier enclaves centered around Marin County, Hollywood and Silicon Valley, with tens of millions of third worlders toiling away in the central valley agri-complexes and oilfields (pace Victor Davis Hanson), kept in line by hygienic lectures from those Birkenstock apostles of equality whose eyes glitter at the vision of that egalitarian utopia on earth even as they are hacked to pieces by their beloved mob.

   Who knows, perhaps this is one solution to the ongoing anomie of White people: a state-wide abject lesson in what happens when you abandon the racial basis for civilization.

   0

   0

   1. Greg Johnson says:

      December 20, 2016 at 1:13 am

      You paint a beautiful picture, brother. If only I had 10,000 loyal followers who would take every opportunity to promote (1) partitioning off the white northern counties of California to form the state of Jefferson, and (2) #Calexit.

      0

      0
   2. Lew says:

      December 21, 2016 at 6:56 pm

      The system’s attempt to de-legitimize Trump seems like a mistake in terms of long term strategy. They are making the case that the system is illegitimate which it is and which is a core point of alt right white nationalism. Otherwise, separation would not be necessary. Every attack on Trump’s legitimacy is a point made for dissolving the nation so these separate peoples can go their own way. When power swings back to their side, they will have done a lot of work for us.

      0

      0

Comments are closed.