Print this post Print this post

The Alt Right & the Jews

echoes3,818 words

Certainly the most basic issue of the Alt Right is that it is entirely legitimate for Whites to identify as Whites and to pursue their interests as Whites, such as resisting attempts to make White Americans a minority. 

Ethnic and racial identities are common among all other groups, and, despite constant propaganda emanating from centers of media and academic power, Whites should be no exception. Voluntarily ceding political and cultural power is the ultimate foolishness, particularly in an atmosphere of non-White grievance and the hostility towards Whites, their history and their culture, that is so apparent today.

However, another issue that is central to the world view of many on the Alt Right (but by no means unanimous) is the issue of Jewish power and influence. Ultimately, this stems from an understanding of the role of Jews in White dispossession, both historically and in the contemporary West. Accounting for around 2% of the U.S. population, Jews have never had much power as a result of sheer numbers. What counts is Jewish power in the media, in the academic world, and in government.

It must be made clear at the outset that the Jewish community is not monolithic, and, as discussed below, there may be some Jews who are wholeheartedly opposed to the de-Europeanization of America. As an obvious example of the lack of unanimity among Jews on important issues, neoconservatism is a Jewish movement, led by and dominated by Jews since its inception. Most Jews are not neocons, but neoconservatism has had a huge influence on American foreign policy, successfully dominating the George W. Bush administration and promoting the Iraq war. And long before that, during the Reagan administration, neoconservatives were instrumental in expelling more traditional conservatives from power in the GOP and in general moving it to the left on critical issues like immigration.

Samuel Francis recounts the

catalog of neoconservative efforts not merely to debate, criticize, and refute the ideas of traditional conservatism but to denounce, vilify, and harm the careers of those Old Right figures and institutions they have targeted. There are countless stories of how neoconservatives have succeeded in entering conservative institutions, forcing out or demoting traditional conservatives, and changing the positions and philosophy of such institutions in neoconservative directions. . . . Writers like M. E. Bradford, Joseph Sobran, Pat Buchanan, and Russell Kirk, and institutions like Chronicles, the Rockford Institute, the Philadelphia Society, and the Intercollegiate Studies Institute have been among the most respected and distinguished names in American conservatism. The dedication of their neoconservative enemies to driving them out of the movement they have taken over and demonizing them as marginal and dangerous figures has no legitimate basis in reality. It is clear evidence of the ulterior aspirations of those behind neoconservatism to dominate and subvert American conservatism from its original purposes and agenda and turn it to other purposes. . . . What neoconservatives really dislike about their “allies” among traditional conservatives is simply the fact that the conservatives are conservatives at all — that they support “this notion of a Christian civilization,” as Midge Decter put it, that they oppose mass immigration, that they criticize Martin Luther King and reject the racial dispossession of white Western culture, that they support or approve of Joe McCarthy, that they entertain doubts or strong disagreement over American foreign policy in the Middle East, that they oppose reckless involvement in foreign wars and foreign entanglements, and that, in company with the Founding Fathers of the United States, they reject the concept of a pure democracy and the belief that the United States is or should evolve toward it.[1]

The result is that the GOP has become the party of the Chamber of Commerce and the Israel Lobby. They are entirely on board with massive non-White immigration, and this is in no small part due to neoconservative influence. Neoconservatives have been staunch supporters of arguably the most destructive force associated with the left in the twentieth century — massive non-European immigration. Support for massive non-European immigration has spanned the Jewish political spectrum throughout the twentieth century to the present and, as noted below, Jewish organizations and activism were responsible for the sea change in immigration policy resulting from the 1965 immigration law. A principal motivation of the organized Jewish community for encouraging such immigration has involved a deeply felt animosity toward the people and culture responsible for the immigration restriction of 1924–1965 — “this notion of a Christian civilization” as Samuel Francis characterized it. The comment of neoconservative Ben Wattenberg indicates the emotional commitment that many Jews have to the ethnic transformation of America: “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.”

Even Daniel Pipes, who is known as an “Islamophobic” critic of the Muslim community, is not supporting Donald Trump because of his stance on immigration- and diversity-related issues. This may seem surprising because one of Trump’s signature proposals has been a moratorium on Muslim immigration, while Hillary Clinton wants to ramp up the number of refugees and other immigrants from Muslim countries.

Actually, it should not be surprising that Pipes is anti-Trump given that he favors a “house-broken Islam” in Western countries. What neocons like Pipes want is continued immigration of Muslims and the creation of Muslim communities that do not threaten the status quo on Israel. They are quite content with the demographic decline of White populations, whether in Europe or the US.

Indeed, Pipes just quit the GOP over this issue, complaining about Trump’s “pro-fascistic tendencies”:

The United States, the world’s oldest democratic republic, faces an internal danger unlike any in the past 1½ centuries, one with the potential to degrade domestic life and reduce the country’s standing in the world. Nothing is as important as resisting and defeating Donald J. Trump and the neo-fascist virus he wishes to bring to the White House.

Needless to say, this is especially hypocritical given Pipes’ status as a pro-Israel activist, since Trump’s proposals parallel the policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel. A consistent theme on the Alt Right is that diaspora Jews have advocated very generous immigration and refugee policies in the West and the idea that Western countries have no ethnic core (the proposition nation idea) while supporting Israel as a Jewish ethnostate. This should be infuriating to anyone who advocates White interests.

But most Jews are not neocons and remain Democrats. Most Jews did not support the Iraq invasion. Nevertheless, Jewish power was very much a part of the Iraq war story. Besides neocons, other prominent elements of the organized Jewish community were intimately involved in the Iraq invasion as well, especially AIPAC. Moreover, the ADL was involved because it called people “anti-Semites” if they said true things about the role of the Israel Lobby in promoting the war; also, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and the American Jewish Congress made comments encouraging President Bush to engage in some kind of military action in Iraq (see first link). The role of the Jewish lobby and neocons in the Iraq war has been noted by many, including John Mearsheimer and Steven Walt in The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.

Another example was bombing Syria in 2013 (“Wall-to-Wall Support for a Strike on Syria”) when the entire organized Jewish community (including the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the ADL, and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations) advocated the strike — a view that was out of step with “record opposition” to the strike noted by many Congressmen but entirely in line with Israeli policy.

Every American, and especially anyone with any sense of American nationalism and sympathetic to the Alt Right, should be furious at Jewish involvement in this disastrous war — thousands dead, tens of thousands grievously wounded, trillions of dollars, with no end in sight. The instability caused by these wars is a main cause of the refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe (abetted by treasonous elites in Europe), and as usual, the entire organized Jewish community in Europe and the U.S. is encouraging generous refugee policies.

Given Jewish influence over the political process, their opinion matters, so that it is vitally important for those of us attempting to reverse White dispossession to understand this, to call attention to it, and to combat it.

The special role of Jewish organizations in the 1965 law was also noted by historians Hugh Davis Graham and Otis Graham. This is how Hugh Davis Graham summarized it in his 2002 book Collision Course (pp. 56–57):

Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe. Jewish members of the Congress, particularly representatives from New York and Chicago, had maintained steady but largely ineffective pressure against the national origins quotas since the 1920s. . . . Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration.

This unanimity across the Jewish organizational spectrum continues today. For example, a wide range of Jewish organizations advocate a path to citizenship for illegals. And in 2013 during debate over the immigration amnesty/surge bill, a letter organized by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and sent by over 100 Jewish organizations to President Obama and Congress notes that “American Jews know too well the impact of restrictive immigration policies.” This bill was bitterly opposed by the grassroots Republican base and didn’t make it through the House. There were no Jewish organizations that came out against the bill.

Jewish Activism on Behalf of Blacks

Activist Jews and the organized Jewish community had a critical role in changing the racial landscape of America. Given that Alt Righters tend strongly to be race realists (i.e., they accept research findings that there are real average differences between races that are important for success in the contemporary world, such as IQ and impulse control), they realize that these actions of the Jewish community have compromised legitimate White interests in a creating a culture of grievance and White guilt in which the genetically based tendencies of Blacks are ignored.

The role of the Jewish community in the transformation of racial attitudes and institutions during the 1950s and 1960s is well known and often commented on with pride by Jewish intellectuals. As I noted in my chapter titled “Jews and Blacks,”

Jews contributed from two thirds to three quarters of the money for civil rights groups during the 1960s. The AJCongress, the AJCommittee, and the ADL worked closely with the NAACP to write legal briefs and raise money in the effort to end segregation. Jewish groups, particularly the AJCongress, played a leading role in drafting civil rights legislation and pursuing legal challenges related to civil rights issues mainly benefiting blacks. “Jewish support, legal and monetary, afforded the civil rights movement a string of legal victories. . . . There is little exaggeration in an American Jewish Congress lawyer’s claim that ‘many of these laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into being by Jewish voters.”

This Jewish role in the racial reconstruction of the US should certainly be something that should be of deep concern to people who identify with the Alt Right.

Jews and the Media

Because of their very powerful role in the media, Jews are also important for the cultural transformations in the areas of promoting a public culture of homosexuality, premarital sex, pornography, and adultery. Survey data continue to show that Jewish attitudes on these issues are well to the left of most Americans. The fact that Jewish attitudes depart from traditional American attitudes on these issues has therefore had a huge effect on American culture and certainly not in a direction supported most of those associated with the Alt Right. And although Jewish activists like Abe Foxman claim that the large number of Jews with positions of power in Hollywood makes no difference, it makes a very large difference (here, pp. xlvi–lvi, especially p. l (50) ff). Even Joe Biden thinks (correctly) that Jews were behind the gay marriage movement.

In general, television portrays Jewish issues “with respect, relative depth, affection and good intentions, and the Jewish characters who appear in these shows have, without any doubt, been Jewish — often depicted as deeply involved in their Judaism” (Pearl & Pearl 1999, 5). For example, All in the Family (and its sequel, Archie Bunker’s Place) not only managed to portray working class Europeans as stupid and bigoted, it portrayed Jewish themes very positively. By the end of its 12-year run, even archenemy Archie Bunker had raised a Jewish child in his home, befriended a black Jew (implication: Judaism has no ethnic connotations), gone into business with a Jewish partner, enrolled as a member of a synagogue, praised his close friend at a Jewish funeral, hosted a Sabbath dinner, participated in a bat mitzvah ceremony, and joined a group to fight synagogue vandalism. These shows, produced by liberal political activist Norman Lear, thus exemplify the general trend for television to portray non-Jews as participating in Jewish ritual, and “respecting, enjoying, and learning from it. Their frequent presence and active involvement underscores the message that these things are a normal part of American life” (Pearl & Pearl 1999, 16). Jewish rituals are portrayed as “pleasant and ennobling, and they bestow strength, harmony, fulfillment, and sense of identity upon those who observe them” (p. 62).

Television presents images of Jewish issues that conform to the views of mainstream Jewish organizations. Television “invariably depicts anti-Semitism as an ugly, abhorrent trait that must be fought at every turn” (p. 103). It is seen as metaphysical and beyond analysis. There is never any rational explanation for anti-Semitism; anti-Semitism is portrayed as an absolute, irrational evil. Positive, well-liked, non-Jewish characters, such as Mary Tyler Moore, often lead the fight against anti-Semitism—a pattern reminiscent of that noted in CofC in which non-Jews become high-profile spokespersons for Jewish dominated movements. There is also the implication that anti-Semitism is a proper concern of the entire community.

Jewish Involvement in Censorship and Punishing Thought Crimes

Another issue that concerns many Alt Righters is that Jewish groups have been in the forefront of penalizing thought crimes related to White identity. Groups like the ADL and the SPLC (funded mainly by Jews) have successfully gotten people fired from their jobs for criticizing Jews or dissenting from other multicultural orthodoxies. As the article on the ADL shows, this is true in other Western countries as well. The general picture is that Jewish groups were enthusiastic defenders of free speech during the 1950s when Jewish communists were being called up before Congressional committees and forced to sign loyalty oaths, but this is definitely not the case now. Even within the Jewish community, there have been campaigns to silence Jewish critics of Israel and thus present a united front (reviewed in Mearsheimer and Walt’s The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy).

Jews and the Alt Right

Although I certainly believe that it’s important for the Alt Right to be aware of the Jewish involvement in White displacement, I think it’s fine that some organizations and Alt Right figures do not discuss Jewish issues. Many people are more open to that approach, and we have to recognize that there are different audiences that can be reached with different messages. My general impression in talking to Alt Righters is that many begin with an awareness of White decline, race differences in traits like IQ, and minority hostility, and then progress toward an understanding of Jewish influence as they read more widely. I would love it if there could be an Alt Right mass movement with significant Jewish support. But at the same time, it is also legitimate for others to discuss Jewish issues in a critical manner.

At the same time, I am often dismayed by how some people associated with the Alt Right express their views on Jewish issues. I have often thought that anyone who hasn’t read a lot in the area and has an IQ of less than 120 should not be allowed to discuss Jewish issues in public.

It is certainly possible that individual Jews may be attracted to work in concert with the Alt Right. This attraction may come because of a genuine concern that a non-White America would not be good for Jews. Indeed, we are already seeing in some European countries that Muslim immigration has resulted in anti-Jewish and anti-Israel attitudes being increasingly common on the left, and that some parties on the left (e.g., the Labour Party in the UK) depend on Muslims votes. Jews have no problem in being friendly with non-Jews, such as Christian Zionists, whenever doing so is “good for the Jews.” We can do the same: whatever is good for European-Americans.

However, as Andrew Joyce has noted, there is a historical pattern where Jews have entered putatively nationalist movements and directed them towards positions that make them “safe for the Jews,” at the expense of developing a true sense of ethnic interests.

That Jews would try to co-opt, or attempt to derail, a potentially damaging movement does have many historical precedents. In one of the most pertinent, Steven Beller writes that during the rise of German nationalism in 1860–1880, Jews attempted to take key roles in the movement with a view to re-directing it from its roots in volkisch philosophy and an antagonism towards Jewish influence, and towards a mission of “cultural and social revolution.” Media promotion and careful networking even led to two Jews, Victor Adler and Heinrich Friedjung, vying for leadership of the German nationalist movement in Austria. Indeed, Adler and Friedjung were two of the five framers of the famous Linz Program of 1882, a political platform that called for the complete Germanization of the Austrian state. It was only due to the continued insistence of the non-Jewish movement leaders, particularly Georg Schönerer, that an ethnic version of German nationalism was eventually adhered to. On Schönerer’s insistence, and to the dismay of the erstwhile Jewish “leaders,” the movement adopted an “Aryan clause.” Their attempt to co-opt the movement having failed, Beller adds, “the Jewish reaction was to look elsewhere for their goals of social and cultural change.” For example, Adler became an out and out Marxist overnight.

Similarly in Germany, historian Gordon Mork notes that Jews were also “prominent” among the early leading advocates of German nationalism. In particular, Jews were concentrated in the National Liberal Party, and then formed an influential clique around Bismarck himself. This diversionary clique within German nationalism may be regarded as a key reason why it was more stunted, in terms of an ethnic expression, than its Austrian counterpart until after World War I.

Moreover, Jews who align themselves with organizations or publications that explicitly promote the interests of European-Americans should be willing to acknowledge the role of the organized Jewish community in the dispossession of European America. They should also acknowledge that the policies of the organized Jewish community at the present time are definitely opposed to the interests of European Americans.

Jews who want to be considered our allies should direct most of their activism to changing the direction of the organized Jewish community. Just as Joe Lieberman was the emissary of the McCain campaign to the traditionally Democratic Jewish community, there is every reason to think that Jews would be far more effective in producing change in the organized Jewish community than non-Jews. Such efforts, especially if they were successful, would be the surest sign of their sincerity and good will.

On the other hand, the absence of a commitment to change the Jewish community or refusing to acknowledge the historical role of the organized Jewish community in producing our present malaise invites the skepticism that the Jews involved in pro-European-American movements are simply trying to make these movements safe for Jews in the event that such movements gain traction. It’s a fallback plan and an escape hatch if things start to get sticky.

Moreover, when pro-European-American groups feel it judicious to be silent about the role of the organized Jewish community in our current malaise, this must be seen as an expression of Jewish power. Much of our task on behalf of European-American civilization and our people is the promotion of historical understanding. Many Jews will inevitably find an honest discussion of the history of European dispossession threatening because of the prominent role of Jews revealed by any objective account of that history. However, silence on the role of Jews in our current malaise forces these groups to live in a sort of a-historical present—avoiding a realistic discussion of the past and preventing any attempt to understand this past in an objective manner.

This forces these pro-European movements into a major departure from all other ethnic activist movements we are aware of, including Judaism: Ethnic identity and commitment are deeply interwoven with an understanding of history. Indeed, Jews’ understanding of their own history as victims of Europeans is an important wellspring of Jewish identity and Jewish activism against European-Americans. As Paul Johnson said in describing the philosophy of Walter Benjamin, a Jewish cultural Marxist: “Politics [is] not merely a fierce physical struggle to control the present, and so the future, but an intellectual battle to control the record of the past.”

Even worse, it prevents these organizations from making explicit attempts to oppose the very real power that the organized Jewish community and other strongly identified Jews continue to exert in a wide range of areas in opposition to the interests of European-Americans. Again, the best role for Jews in these movements is to be vocal critics of the Jewish community and its role in the dispossession of European-Americans. But the unfortunate reality is that, just like mainstream politicians forced to never mention the power of the Israel Lobby, these pro-European-American groups end up ignoring the 800-lb gorilla in their midst — a wonderful comment on Jewish power in America.

In guarded optimism, we might look to the future and hope that some influential Jews will be able to look at this history without their ethnic blinders and come to see their own best interests lie with a renewed European America.


1. Samuel Francis, “The Neoconservative Subversion,” in Brent Nelson, ed., Neoconservatism. Occasional Papers of the Conservative Citizens’ Foundation, no. 6 (2004) (St. Louis: Conservative Citizens’ Foundation), 6–12.



This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted September 13, 2016 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Poignant. Exhaustive. Necessary introduction to the coming discussion of the political ‘changing of the guard’.

  2. Man Against Time
    Posted September 13, 2016 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Excellent as always. I agree that it’s fine that some alt-right outlets are silent on the JQ; however, I think Kevin MacDonald has too much of an optimistic view about jews and Gentiles living in the same country.

    Jews cannot stay in the West. Even if they admit their role in White dispossession, they must not be allowed to stay in our societies. It’s a cliche used a lot, but it’s true: Hitler was right. Our forefathers had less scientific proof regarding race realism yet they possessed far greater wisdom than we do today.

    Jews cannot stay in the West. They must leave for good.

    • Sonnenrad
      Posted September 14, 2016 at 10:08 am | Permalink

      I would not necessarily mount a defense for maintaining a continued Jewish presence in the West, but as a point of logic, isn’t it a non sequitur to say that they cannot even be present in white societies?

      Would the JQ not be satisfactorily answered if 1) it were written into law that Jews are not Europeans and are therefore ineligible for citizenship in white countries, which also precludes them (along with any other non-European group) from exercising any political influence or occupying positions of influence in certain culturally critical sectors, such as finance and media; and 2) whites had a revitalized morality and positive identity oriented towards the healthy, strong, and beautiful, whereby we unapologetically dominate our own societies?

      • redking
        Posted September 14, 2016 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

        No, because they would agitate against that endlessly.

  3. Andy
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 12:22 am | Permalink

    Nothing will change until something is forced. You can talk all you want and discuss noble ideas of white self-interest, but the takeover of America by Jewish influence is nearly complete. The very character of our societies has been co-opted by this force, especially through the media. We gentiles with our open minds have slowly been converted to another way of thinking. It has been an insidious process, slow and steady and determined. We no longer know if there is another way of being white Americans.

    It doesn’t seem like people will really wake up unless there is some kind of overturning of society. My extended family are all progressive liberals and they can not see any problems other than people being racist, anti-environmentalist, etc. They are good, kind people, but aren’t pursuing the depth of inquiry necessary to unravel the situation. I don’t see how such people will ever be part of a change that the alt-right movement desires. I am a bit despondent over this situation.

  4. Steven
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 12:47 am | Permalink

    I’d rather let a bunch of mexicans, blacks and muslims join the alt-right before letting jews. I have never, in my entire life, met a “good” jew. We should stop trying to pander to them as potential allies, they are not. Also any group that does not discuss the jewish problem is not alt-right in my opinion. Understanding and discussing the problem of jewry is critical in order to solve the issue of white replacement. I’ve seen a lot of kosher people like Paul Joseph Watson and Milo Yiannopoulous claiming to be alt-right and all they are doing is trying to subvert the alt-right to serve zionism just like they did with conservatism. None of it is genuine. I also do not support Donald Trump because of his zionism. I will not support a kosher candidate ever. I do not care what they promise (it’s most likely all lies anyway) and I do not trust jews. Sorry but no.

    • Riki
      Posted September 15, 2016 at 3:11 am | Permalink

      Heartily agreed. Just one point, Milo is Jewish, not a Kosher gentile.

  5. Ray
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    It actually makes sense that neocons would want a tamed version of Islam because they want a tamed version of Christianity — tamed toward their ends in the Middle East and judeophillic. It’s no accident that they refer to Islamonazis because they view Untamed versions of each group in the same light . It seems neocons think white Gentiles are below Jews but equal with other gentiles while liberal Jews think white Gentiles are below Jews and worse than other Gentiles.The only exception might be right-wing Jews who marry white gentiles, converts, and those who renounce the Jewish identity such as G Atzmon. Actually you know the notion that most Jews would view whites as equals is kind of strange because they don’t even view each other as equals in Israel and that’s why it’s a very dysfunctional society. However, they do coalesce together, and even though Sephardic Jews are oppressed they still side with the Ashkenazi against Palestinians. Maybe they just have trouble joining whites against other groups. Maybe doing so makes them feel like they’re taking on the identity of people that persecuted their ancestors and they don’t like that. It seems to me maybe they’re too traumatized about their past and maybe they need to move to IsraeI. I don’t know. I think that history isn’t about them being rejected so much as it is about them rejecting their host populations and choosing to dwell apart. it’s an Impulse that created them. It was only diluted slightly when the ancestors of the Ashkenazi mixed slightly with Mediterranean peoples. But since that initial mixing little has occurred. I think a few Jews may want to be on the white team but not very many.

  6. Tom
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 6:01 am | Permalink

    “Jews have no problem in being friendly with non-Jews, such as Christian Zionists”

    Where’s the evidence for this? My experience is that Christian Zionists love Jews and Jews passively resent Christian Zionists while gladly taking their money. Is that a kind of relationship we want to enter?

    “I would love it if there could be an Alt Right mass movement with significant Jewish support. But at the same time, it is also legitimate for others to discuss Jewish issues in a critical manner.”

    Can’t have your cake and eat it too. Jews and judeoskeptics CANNOT coexist within the same movement. The alt right means white nationalism or nothing at all. If we let in “friendly” Jews, we can expect to see the development of the “neo-alt-right,” which will amount to nothing more than “Milo-que toast” contrarianism.

    I, like Dr. MacDonald, can forgive Jared Taylor for remaining totally ignorant to the Jewish question. Much more harmful I think is being knowledgeable, yet watering down the Jewish question. Either take a firm stance, or get out of the way. Enough with the “hope” and “guarded optimism” for the Jews.

    When we ruminate on the hope of a pro-European Jewish fifth column, we pull our punches, hoping not to offend these “good Jews.” This softening only confuses our own people and hurts our chances of success.

    • Riki
      Posted September 15, 2016 at 3:29 am | Permalink

      Totally agree with your argument, Tom! As for me, despite Dr. MacDonald’s great intellectual stature and his vast contribution to the discourse of Jewish question in our circle, I do not share his “guarded optimism” or any possibility to win “sincerity” or “good will” of Jews and I also felt a bit averse to his occasional condescension that a person with an IQ below 120 should not talk about Jews in public (though I happen to have an IQ slightly above 120 according to a lab test I took previously). Deep in my heart, and based on all the glaring irrefutable facts past and present, I do not trust Jews and do not harbor any hope about their being allied with White Nationalism and fighting in the same trench with us voluntarily without ulterior motives.

  7. GurkhaSam
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.”
    The demonization and dispossession of whites in Europe and North America by peoples that are far more hostile towards Jews than white Christians have ever been is a sane strategy? To me they are sawing off the same log they are sitting on. Aside from that demographics are destiny. It is probably already too late for the white nirvana that is being pined for. A number of factors have brought us to this unhappy state and Jews are not responsible for all the misery. Not the least of which is 3rd wave feminism which is wringing out the last vestiges of femininity and masculinity out of the respective sexes, which of course are just a construct to begin with. I’m sorry. Some aspects of “Jewish strategy” baffle me and at this point there isn’t a whole lot of good, white or otherwise worth saving as the sun sets quickly on the west. You’re not going to get your white nirvana. The best you can hope for is relative safety and prosperity in your walled communities of the future. I wish it all were not so.

    • PCA
      Posted September 14, 2016 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

      Are you actually suggesting modern feminism isn’t a jewish ideology?

  8. PCA
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    McDonald’s optimism is dumbfounding. How can someone who has so carefully and exhaustively recounted the Jewish subversion and gradual eradication of European America entertain such delusions?

    Perhaps his scientific-positivistic, factual approach to the question has blinded him to the religious dimension. At the heart of Judaism lies the notion that only their identity is worth preserving, for thousands upon thousands of years, for they are chosen. All other peoples’ identities are false gods that must be crushed. This is not a creed that brooks compromise. There is no bottom to their subversion. They subvert and subvert long past the point of self-interest, until they are stopped from without. (At which point they look for a new host and start again.) It has always been thus. It is spiritually ordained.

  9. FKA Max
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Disclosure: I am a regular commenter at the Occidental Observer website, and personally think that Professor Kevin MacDonald is the single most important thinker and academic on the Alt Right.

    There has been a continual debate in the Alt Right on Milo Yiannopoulos and his true intentions and allegiances:

    Personally, I am not too bothered by Milo Yiannopoulos’ homosexuality, or that his mother is Jewish, etc.

    My biggest disagreement with him and other Alt Light figures like Gavin McInnes, both of whom are Catholic, is their anti-Planned Parenthood stance, which I feel is tremendously harmful to the Alt Right cause, and is a threat on par with Third World immigration into the West, especially in the United States, which has large, fertile, non-White populations . I always cite this brilliant Counter-Currents article by Patrick Le Brun when discussing this topic: ”White Nationalists Need Planned Parenthood, Not the Pope”

    I know that Milo Yiannopoulos is aware of Professor MacDonald, because before he published his exposé on the Alt Right for Breitbart in late March 2016, he retweeted a Twitter post by Professor MacDonald on his Twitter account @nero. Since he was banned permanently from Twitter in July 2016, I cannot link to this retweet. I think he probably came across Professor MacDonald’s work when he researched the Alt Right in a more in-depth way for his Alt Right piece.

    My suggestion is, that Milo Yiannopoulos should interview Professor MacDonald about this specific article by Professor MacDonald, the negative Jewish influence on Western/White Civilization in general and how well-intentioned Jews could potentially help out the Alt Right movement in non-subversive ways (make the Jewish community more understanding of and friendly toward the Alt Right, as suggested by Professor MacDonald) on his radio show/podcast, to prove that he has no hostile intentions or ulterior motives toward the Alt Right. This would also align with his stated mission and persona as an edgy and radical Free Speech advocate and defender.

    I do not have the contacts to make this happen, but maybe Mr. Johnson and Professor MacDonald, or other leaders within the Alt Right can approach Milo Yiannopoulos or some of his associates with this proposal.

    If he makes it happen, this will boost his credibility within the Alt Right, if he rejects the proposal or makes excuses, we will finally and unequivocally know that he is not a well-intentioned fellow traveler of the Alt Right movement.

  10. antiochus
    Posted September 14, 2016 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    I absolutely love the comment section here. Kevin Mac is without doubt one of our finest men on the academic battle front…but I would like to make one point here. Jews absolutely, unequivocal ly, should never be accepted unless their intentions are to drop Judaism and become born again Aryans, a phrase I coined a while back. We should not let Jews manipulate us for their purposes, but rather the other way around. If a biological Jew sees himself as white and truly, honestly wants to martial his/her resources for our future, then we can give them a comprehensive lie detector test and see if they are genuinely allied…and that is only if we feel they are worthy or have something to offer. We should never placate, compromise, or let them in because they reason we are winning and it “will be good for Jews”..that just expands our problems. I am open to supervised assimilation of worthy actors and nothing more.. What matters is how they see their own soul…and why would we bother if things are going our way to open ourselves to subversion from within..just as white people who are part Lebanese, or Persian, or Turkish, etc, who look and act European can be considered I have no problem considering Jews with the right attitude and proportion of European blood into the cause..but not ever for their own purposes, that would be crazy

  11. Posted September 15, 2016 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    The author misses a major split in Jewish thought between the Zionists and the Cosmopolitans. The first group were and are ethnic nationalists. The second group, of which he is writing, are internationalists who want open borders and mass immigration. Failure to see and make this distinction is hurting the Alt-Right.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted September 15, 2016 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

      This is a spurious distinction, because virtually every Jew is both a Zionist and a Cosmopolitan. Netanyahu, who is certainly a Zionist, is a great example of this for denouncing Donald Trump’s proposal to halt Muslim immigration into the US. Jews want cosmopolitanism for us (because it gives them easy access, easy exit in our societies) and ethnonationalism for themselves, because this sort of double standard works to maximize their group power.

  12. Konstantin Vadhajtás
    Posted September 16, 2016 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    Great article. I see these patterns with the so called alt right Jews who started popping up as we became more popular. Without fail they try to deny or at least downplay the role the Jewish community had in European dispossession. It’s their version of the moderate muslim vs islamist extremist argument.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace