Counter-Currents
1,080 words
Select faces of the Founding Fathers and former Presidents of the United States decorate our nation’s currency. The selection process is fairly basic: do something great, something worth celebrating, something worth remembering for America.
Andrew Jackson, the son of Irish immigrants, was born into poverty. In 1787, at the age of 20, he earned admission to the North Carolina bar and later moved to Tennessee where he practiced law.
Jackson went on to serve as a major general in the War of 1812 and commanded U.S. forces in a five-month campaign against the Creek Indians, who were allies of the British. In January 1815, he led American forces to victory over the British in the Battle of New Orleans.
In 1817, he was recognized by all as a national war hero. And as acting commander of the Army’s southern district, he led a force into Florida, captured Spanish posts at St. Mark’s and Pensacola, claiming the surrounding land for the United States and driving the Spanish from Florida. It would later become a state in 1845.
In 1828, Andrew Jackson became the 7th President of the United States. Jackson was a defender of states’ rights and of the people against moneyed interests. It is interesting and ironic, considering the controversy about Jackson’s replacement on the $20 bill, that one of the most important aspects of his presidency was his opposition to the central bank. In fact, he was quoted saying that such banking constituted the “prostration of our Government to the advancement of the few at the expense of the many.” He saw the bank as a “privileged institution and an enemy of the common people.”
Andrew Jackson was a ferocious man. He fought 103 duels of honor before he became President. At the age of 67, Jackson became the first President targeted for assassination. The gun misfired, and Jackson attacked his assailant, clubbing him with his cane.
Rising from humble beginnings through hard work and strength of character to become a war hero and a two-term president of the United States makes Andrew Jackson’s life worth commemorating with statues and other memorials, place names, and his face on the $20 note.
This nation was founded by, built by, and fought for by white men. Former president Andrew Johnson once said that “this is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President it shall be a government for white men.” This sentiment was commonplace among our Founding Stock. The United States was never meant to be a multicultural nation. It was intended to be an extension of Europe.
As soon as Jews arrived in America they began to politically organize, and acted as our competitor right from the start. Jews manipulated the American system for their own benefit. A nation whose list of war heroes was extensive, whose battle for independence had already been won, whose laws and government had already been established, America was a nation alive and well until the arrival of an ethnic group with competing interests.
Since becoming a force in American politics, the Jewish elite has worked tirelessly to subvert European American values and culture, while simultaneously remaining the most privileged and powerful minority group in the United States. For instance, while Jews only represent roughly 2% of the American population, they also represent 48% of the billionaire class. The Federal Reserve, the centralized bank which prints the lovely portraits of past presidents on our currency, also happens to have had three consecutive Jewish chairmen: Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and most recently, Janet Yellen. Then we have Jack Lew, the Treasury Secretary who is responsible for Harriet Tubman’s replacement of Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill; he also happens to be Jewish.
With all of this privilege, what can be said about the heroism of Jews in American history? How many Jewish war heroes are there compared to Europeans? How many Jewish statesmen dedicated their lives to the betterment of European America, as opposed to transforming it into a multicultural hell? What, exactly, have Jews done to earn their present-day power and privilege? Is there a single one of them that measures up to Andrew Jackson?
Unfortunately, Jews have dedicated their intellect and energy to tearing down rather than building up America. They pushed the redefinition of America from a European nation to a multicultural proposition nation. They pushed the 1965 immigration act which opened America to race replacement immigration from the Third World. Jews have promoted racial integration, affirmative action, and massive transfers of both wealth and status from whites to non-whites, especially blacks. Thus America is no longer a white nation defined and populated by descendants of war heroes and frontiersmen.
Similar policies have been adopted in all European nations since the Second World War. European people are being systematically replaced in our homelands. Our history is presented as uniquely evil, a karmic disaster. Our political and social interests are seen as hateful and exclusionary. This did not happen by accident. It was perpetrated by our ethnic competitor. Western Civilization is being murdered, eaten alive by parasites.
Left to their own devices, blacks are usually politically inert and ineffectual. Many are inclined toward black separatism and nationalism, which suits us fine. Blacks have been turned into a tool of anti-white ethnic vilification and displacement by Jews. The replacement of Andrew Jackson by Harriet Tubman is just one small skirmish in a much larger battle.
Tubman probably had real virtues and achievements. After all, her elevation has to be plausible. But Harriet Tubman is not being honored for her virtues and achievements, Andrew Jackson is being attacked for his. Honoring Tubman is not an expression of black power, but of Jewish power. Jews don’t love blacks, they hate whites.
There are no portraits of Jews on United States currency, just symbols for the manipulation of their host populations, which they hold in contempt. Jews prefer having the substance of power rather than the symbols.
Andrew Jackson fought against the central bank. He lived his entire life putting honor and principle above money. So I doubt that he would be particularly honored by appearing on a Federal Reserve note. But we should still be angry about Jackson’s replacement, which symbolizes the loss of our nation. The fact that Harriet Tubman can take his place without protest symbolizes the death of our heroic spirit — the apathy that has replaced our will to power. If Jackson’s ferocious commitment to honor lived on in our hearts rather than died in our pockets, none of this would have happened.
13 comments
Excellent piece. All true. The Eternal Nation Wreckers have never had it so good. The Western Hemisphere pogroms will begin as soon as the lazy plebs start to really suffer. That day is coming.
“With all of this privilege, what can be said about the heroism of Jews in American history? How many Jewish war heroes are there compared to Europeans? How many Jewish statesmen dedicated their lives to the betterment of European America, as opposed to transforming it into a multicultural hell? ”
Confederate Secretary of State Judah P Benjamin springs to mind….
On the bright side, our people may become increasingly skeptical of the money system if the faces of our national heroes are replaced with the faces of the parasite classes. Perhaps this development will encourage average Joes to look elsewhere for the meaning of money. From an anti-Bourgeois standpoint, this may be a positive development; appearances will begin to reflect intent. As GJ said, “the Bourgeois man is a natural slave,” therefore it is fitting that a slave will soon appear on our currency.
Don’t the Congress have a final say on who and what goes on the currency notes?
Author wrote: The Federal Reserve, the centralized bank which prints the lovely portraits of past presidents on our currency…
No, The FED doesn’t print the currency. The task is done by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureau_of_Engraving_and_Printing
What the Bureau of Engraving and Printing should be printing is not $20 bills with pictures of ugly Blacks, but boat tickets to Africa like those printed by George Lincoln Rockwell.
While I do know many Jews who are republicans and nationalists in their own right… This article is fantastic and can not possibly be said better. Zionist / Talmudic Jews are the real enemy of all Western countries. That much is certain. I sure hope someone gets back that fighting spirit.
This policy is happening all over the white European world – symbols of white historical figures are being demoted, degraded or outright torn down in favor of black ones. I agree with the article that it’s clearly a Jewish attack on the fragile remains of white civilization, but more than that – it is an attack on reason and human dignity itself.
It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency where whites are victims of black crime day in day out, and by extension – to celebrate black identity as some kind of virtue. It is an outrageous insult to victims of black crime.
It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency, especially militant blacks, at a time when blacks are making unreasonable demands about how their own dysfunctionality is policed, which essentially comes down to demanding the police turn a blind eye to black violence and crime because it interferes with their sense of identity, including demanding the ‘right’ to attack armed police officers and not be shot. None of their claims are grounded in reason or evidence or, needless to say – consistent with law and order, instead it is nothing more than brainless anti-white identity-hysteria egged on by Jewish plutocrats like George Soros.
It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency where blacks have played no role in the intellectual founding of the country, and outside of their own claims (and perhaps some Jewish writers), little to no role at all in advancing the country as a whole since then, and have mostly been a serious burden on the white population. It is both disingenuous and malevolent to celebrate black activity (for the benefit of blacks) as some kind of iconic image for everyone else. It can only be for ‘everyone else’ if everyone else (whites) accept the idea of being displaced by a Jewish-steered illiterate black militancy as a virtue.
Consequently, it is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency where blacks do not collectively wield the same level of intelligence as whites, and whatever Tubman is allegedly being celebrated for – it’s particularly unlikely to be her IQ. Tubman is thoroughly removed from the actual functioning of all of the higher institutions of America. She could not participate in them or advance them through qualities consistent with the qualities of those who founded the country.
It is an affront to sell Tubman to whites as a ‘gun toting Republican’ to try to allay fears of cultural takeover among whites, and then more so – as Jewish organizations are also at the forefront of pushing gun-control legislation, and have been spectacularly successful at corrupting the Republican party including into supporting deranged aggressive wars on behalf of Jewish interests.
It is an affront to put symbols of ugliness on currency. Tubman is ugly.
It is an affront to put alien symbols on the currency of a country founded by whites. Tubman appears fully removed from white experience.
It is an affront to female beauty to try to pass off the ugliness and alien features of Tubman as a female icon. Whilst it may not be her fault what she looked like, to make a choice to use Tubman, who has the face of a primitive being full of black hostility, is a direct assault, even inversion of the notion of womanhood. One could argue that Tubman is female, but not a woman.
Indeed it seems far more likely to me Tubman was selected not for her achievements, but simply because she is so alien and hideous and hostile looking. Tubman’s grotesque image is guaranteed on one or more psychological levels (subconscious where Jewish leftist rhetoric has replaced natural values in the conscious mind in those with little defenses) to alienate whites from their own country and institutions and hurt their morale (putting aside whether the Fed is a white institution, the images on a nation’s currency should reflect its institutions).
And of course it is an affront to remove a great man like Jackson and to replace him with the above.
You know what I think ? How about Israel be the ‘light unto the nations’ here? And put Yasser Arafat, dead Palestinian women and children, Wafa Idris (first Palestinian female suicide bomber) or Rachel Corrie on THEIR currency to show the lessons and history of oppressed peoples and women in THEIR midst, and these peoples contributions to Israel.
And I really really hope the backlash against this increases when people get the notes in their hands and see what a tacky monstrous debacle of Jewish overreach actually looks like.
To put it simply, blacks are just tools of the jews to degrade, destroy and decimate the White Race. Black IQ ranges around 70-75%. Look at Africa: see any intellectual and cultural development there yet??
The jews have enslaved the blacks in their own false sense of “victimization.” Once they’re rid of us, they’ll be back in the fields again. You don’t really think the jews will pick their own cotton, now do ya??
Very well said, wsigma.
A brilliant article, Brian. The Protocols of Zion are in full swing here. They warn us and we don’t listen.
They want a world without Gentiles:
https://cartiermccloud.wordpress.com/2014/08/
It’s not just about power and control, they have to own us to tear us down. It’s about the slaughter and extermination of the White Race. The coming WW III will make the previous wars look like a garden party.
Has anyone noticed how quickly, how rapidly, with what great enthusiasm, the so called conservative movement has embraced Tubman as the gun-carrying, bible-bashing Republican? Its been a repeat of MLK worship all over again, Tubman being the new deity for conservatives.
The American conservatives / cuskservatives, in a craven, pathetic display of intellectual, moral and emotional surrender have welcomed the disappearance of Jackson and the printing of Tubman’s ugly mug on the currency note. Conservatives are a tool of Jewish supremacy in the US. Their overthrow is essential for any American revival (if there is to be one at all).
“Jackson was a defender of states’ rights and of the people against moneyed interests.”
Trump is a defender of national rights against modern day moneyed interests. Trump is a similar character to Jackson, though I wish he would say “this is a country for white men..”
Also, I thought this was a good aphorism “Jews prefer having the substance of power rather than the symbols.”
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment