Counter-Currents
New on CounterCurrentsTV Call Brussels
New%20on%20CounterCurrentsTV%20%20Call%20Brussels
New%20on%20CounterCurrentsTV%20%20Call%20Brussels
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
The Red Terror in Kiev: A Warning from a Century Ago, Part 2
-
The Red Terror in Kiev: A Warning from a Century Ago, Part 1
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 31: Sobre la Violencia
-
On the Border of Right and Wrong: The Iran-Contra Affair, Part 2
-
Foreign Policy, Non-Interventionism, and the Draft
-
Saint Che’s Guide to Asymmetric Warfare, Part 2
-
Holding France at Knifepoint
-
Holding France at Knifepoint
4 comments
Very good. We need more of this. Whitey needs his nose rubbed into his humiliation over and over again until he learns to defend himself.
http://eginotes.blogspot.com/2016/03/call-brussels.html
A bigger question I would like to ask,
Why do Europeans/Whites like to lie? Is it to keep the lie alive, so White families can have their gated communities? Is it an illusion for other races, a way to keep our racial consciousness safe from the liberal world? Did we play too much with the market, and the Jews like to exploit us? Are we playing a game? And we secretly don’t want to play it anymore?
Does everyone who claims to vote Hillary do it out of morality, and then, behind the curtains, vote for Trump?
Why do we keep secrets? It’s almost we have learn to be dishonest in life to get ahead. When will the Belgium people unite? They are not like Liberal White Americans!
Whites today, especially in their 30s an 50s, keep this lie alive. I don’t want millennials falling for this!
An honest suggestion:
The radical critiques of modernity were all very much correct and irrefutable. The political movements most willing to incorporate these critiques came to power only in those nations whose health was most precarious – i.e. the ones who did not even have the option of comfortable, bloated mediocrity. (Modern Islam contains a critique of modernity, but tries to place itself outside modernity – an option not truly available to the West).
With the defeat of these movements, the lessons that they offered were obscured – the only lessons learned by our politicians were the cynical, Machiavellian sort. Thus we not only had propaganda about how evil these defunct regimes were, but we had growing experience of these war-machines in action through our own governments.
We dreaded a politics founded unabashedly upon industrialized warfare and concentrated power instead of our own situation, which is founded *apologetically* upon them.
Many feel that they have to keep lying and be friendly and ‘sympathique’ or else their governments will skew even more fascist and they will all be front line infantry in a perpetual nuclear, biological, robotic war for profit – which you must admit, is an actual possibility. I mean, if Eisenhower was appalled, then what can you expect of the average man?
Which is why people cannot say ‘no’ to anything today, not even waffles.
As you wrote your commentary the Roosevelt-Churchillian war aim of Unconditional Surrender flashed across my mind.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.