The Coming Pedophile Rape Epidemic

^[1]1,232 words

Slovak translation here ^[2]

I first drafted this essay back in June of 2012 after reading an article on CNN by a Jewish homosexual named James Cantor entitled “Do Pedophiles Deserve Sympathy? ^[3]” In it, Cantor argues that pedophiles should not be morally condemned as people who fail to do the right thing, but pitied as people who are born with abnormal brains.

Pedophilia is not, however, simply a sexual preference, just one more kinky thing that consenting adults might do behind closed doors.

Pedophiles by definition are not attracted to adults, and non-adults by definition cannot consent to sex. Therefore, pedophilia is by its nature a desire to rape, and rape is a crime.

Of course Cantor points out that being inclined toward pedophilia is not the same thing as actually molesting children, which is true. So trying to set aside the emotional revulsion and moral stigma attached to pedophilia, and instead looking at it as a mental illness, is not necessarily a bad thing. Indeed, it might help us find treatments for pedophilia, which might actually save children from being raped. It all sounds so sweetly reasonable. And in a well-ordered society, it might actually be a humane and workable policy.

But then a cold chill of horror went through me when I realized that, on the contrary, Cantor was actually laying the groundwork for a pedophile rape epidemic. Sympathy for pedophiles will lead to an epidemic of child rape merely by becoming a politically correct liberal cause. All that is required for an epidemic of rape is for a particularly rape-prone class of people to become a protected politically correct victim group. And pedophiles are by their nature rape-prone. For once the liberal mind decides that a particular cause is morally imperative, it is willing to evade reality, to lie, and to defame, censor, and even persecute truth tellers when confronted with the negative consequences of its policies.

I never finished the first draft, however, because the argument became complicated. Racial egalitarianism is the great moral crusade in modern America. And its consequences are a catastrophe that beggars imagination when one begins to add up the enormous increase in crime and social alienation, the destruction of great cities, the collapse of education, and the sheer amount of lying, corruption, and hypocrisy required to maintain the fiction of racial equality.

Political correctness is nothing more than lying and injustice. The basic lie is that people are equal, and the injustice follows from the lie: false excuses for the guilty, false blame upon the innocent, penalizing those who did nothing to compensate those who suffered nothing, etc. But it does not stop with mere rent-seeking. For political correctness demands that whites accept predatory non-whites into their societies and then covers up the inevitable consequences: tension, hatred, and violence, in which whites are disproportionately the victims. When liberals lie, people die.

But my argument was specifically about rape. I needed a historical example of a rape epidemic caused and protected by liberal political correctness. Of course we know that the amount of interracial rape, specifically black men raping white women, has gone up considerably over the last 100 years, from the time when such a crime would often trigger the swift and deadly deterrent of a lynch mob and when the only people who had any sympathy for black rapists were Communists trying to stir the pot — to the present day when blacks mingle freely with whites, when white girls are programmed to suppress their feelings of caution around black men lest they seem “racist,” and in which the media works to conceal black crime and describes hulking black thugs and rapists as “gentle giants,” lest people start thinking that integration is a mistake.

Raping white women has not been legalized. But it has been massively enabled nonetheless, simply because blacks are a politically correct protected group. But statistics supporting this argument are hard to come by. In 2007, Laurence Auster cited some shocking 2005 statistics ^[4] about the massive disparity of black-on-white and white-on-black rapes and sexual assaults. But I could find no statistics to illustrate rape levels before and after desegregation. So I set the draft aside and went on to other things.

Then, much to my horror, an eloquent proof of my thesis that political correctness leads to mass rape appeared just last year: Rotherham ^[5], a town of 250,000 in Sheffield in which 1,400 English girls were raped, prostituted, and otherwise sexually exploited during a 16-year period between 1997 and 2013. The victims were mostly white. The perpetrators were mostly Pakistani.

Of course the police were informed of these crimes, but parents who objected to the rape of their daughters were treated as potential racists. Reports on the rape epidemic in 2002, 2003, and 2006 were suppressed by the local police and government, who judged that it was better that English girls continue to be raped by non-whites than the English to feel fear and hatred toward outsiders.

When the story went public in 2014, what happened? Did the streets of Rotherham run with “rivers of blood” as Englishmen avenged their daughters and punished gangs of rapists and the police and bureaucrats who covered up and enabled their crimes? Of course not. Some of the criminals have been punished, but none of the police and bureaucrats have been arrested.

Furthermore, since the same causes give rise to the same effects, there is nothing unique about Rotherham. Thus wherever Pakistani men have access to English girls, we have to conclude that systematic rape and sexual abuse are taking place. This is, in short, a national crisis. There are many more than 1,400 victims. And the crimes will continue until their racial, religious, and cultural roots are address rather than obscured and evaded.

From start to finish England’s Muslim pedophile rape epidemic is the product of liberal political correctness. Pakistanis are in Europe because of multiculturalism; they mix freely with the local population because of multiculturalism; the locals were taught not to fear and shun them lest they commit the sin of “racism”; and when the pattern of rape first emerged, it would have been widely publicized and ruthlessly suppressed were it not for the overriding PC imperative of white race replacement.

Pedophile rape was not made legal in England. All that was required for a pedophile rape epidemic is for the rape-prone Paki population to become a politically-correct victim group. Then a networks of liars, excuse-makers, and crime concealers embedded in the press, academia, and bureaucracy sprang into action. Liberals lie, and your children are raped. Then they lie to cover it up, and still more children are raped.

And now the same evil bastards are at work trying to make pedophiles into a PC protected group. In the last couple of years, there has been a flurry of articles in the American press, the message of which is summed up in the title of Margot (((Kaplan’s))) New York Times article, “Pedophilia: A Disorder, not a Crime ^[6].” Salon.com, however, has become the flagship publication for pedophile advocacy ^[7]. (Evidently, journalists fear no blow-back from whites. Only Muslims pull a Charlie Hebdo ^[8].)

But the same causes produce the same effects. The Left is now extending its protection from Pakistani pedophiles to the whole pedophile population. Not every town has Pakis, but every town has pedophiles. Thus the movement to make pedophiles the objects of PC pity will make every town a Rotherham.