Print this post Print this post

Thanks, But No Thanks

Ann Landers

Ann Landers

1,248 words

Jews exhibit a weird psychology. No matter how “Aryan” some of them may look, their minds are foreign. It is deeply disturbing that so many people are blind to this or, if aware, indifferent. Even ignoring their many appalling lies and grotesque crimes, the alien mindset is apparent in common statements. An atrocious example is the Zionist chestnut “A land without a people for a people without a land.”

I swallowed that one. I was college educated and well-read. More importantly, unlike most people I’m independent-minded and ordinarily think critically, rationally, and empirically, no matter how “sacred” or taboo the subject. I don’t blindly swallow everything I’m told just because it’s rammed down society’s throat by authority. Far from it. And yet, I sinned, for many innocent lives were at stake. But nothing clicked in my head to stop me. I swallowed the stupid lie without thinking. And in such a case, ignorance was no excuse.

Jewish formulations have a peculiar way of doing that, of suspending our critical (not to mention moral) faculties in a way no other people can accomplish. It’s an astonishing symbiosis.

Another memorable example was a 1991 column I read by Ann Landers, America’s newspaper advice columnist. She’d previously published it in 1981 at the request of the president of Notre Dame University, the brown-nosing Father Theodore Hesburgh.

The piece, supposedly penned by 1950s TV yakker Sam Levenson, was called “Answer to an Anti-Semite.” Perhaps Levenson wrote it, perhaps he didn’t. His name is invariably misspelled “Levinson” in the columns. Who the alleged “anti-Semite” being “answered” was is never clarified, no doubt because he’s entirely fictitious. The piece is simply a familiar spit-in-your-face act, a generic assault upon white people.

The article also ran in the “Dear Abby” column under the headline, “Genuine anti-Semites should accept illness.” A longer, more boastful version was published in 2004 to malign Mel Gibson’s elderly Catholic father, Hutton Gibson. (Jeanne Phillips, Pauline Phillips’ [see below] daughter, has been “Dear Abby” since 2002.)

The column starts out with a dual lie: “It’s a free world. You don’t have to like Jews if you don`t want to,” then continues, “but if you are going to be an anti-Semite you should be consistent and turn your back on the medical advances that Jews made possible.”

White Americans are lectured that they’ve been showered with gifts from the likes of Baruch Blumberg (vaccine for hepatitis), August Von [sic] Wasserman (the Wasserman test for syphilis), Paul Ehrlich (first effective drug to fight syphilis), Bela Schick (diagnostic skin test for diphtheria), Oskar Minkowski (insulin for diabetes), Burill Crohn (identified Crohn’s Disease), Alfred Hess (demonstrated that vitamin C cured scurvy), Casimir Funk (used vitamin B to treat beriberi), and, of course, Jonas Salk (first polio vaccine) and Albert Sabin (oral polio vaccine).

The statement concludes, “Humanitarianism requires that we [Jews as “humanitarians,” wow] offer these gifts to all people of the world, regardless of race, color or creed. So the anti-Semites who don’t want to accept these gifts can go ahead and turn them down, but I’m warning you, you aren’t going to feel so good.”

What struck me most was the completely alien thought process behind the column, never mind the noble, humanitarian, colorblind pose, as divorced from reality as you can get, or its overweening arrogance and deeply insulting tone, lashing out hatefully and without provocation as it does at the very people who handed Jews the entire world on a platter, forfeiting their own birthright and future existence in the process.

Notice how every Jew—in this case Ann Landers/Dear Abby/Sam Levenson—shares the same mindset and lectures us condemningly from the plural first person “we” point of view, as if each and every one of them were the personal spokesman for all Jews, not only living, but extending forever into the past.

There is also the weird, implicit notion that “We could have withheld medical discoveries from white people. It would have been the natural thing for us to do.” What other race would even think such a thing? None! Not a single one.

If it’s an itemized reckoning of humanitarian benefits they want—in the realm of medicine or any other field—there is no comparison. It is not even close. Jews have benefited far more from our achievements and largesse than we have from theirs. They owe us much, much more than they have ever dreamed of repaying before the accounts would come close to balancing.

Where do these conceited people get off? Does the scam never end?

What a blessing it would have been to have foregone the tens of millions of lives lost to Communism in the Eastern European concentration camps, possibly the mass slaughters of World Wars I and II, the never-ending bloodletting in the Middle East, the lawless tidal wave of Third World immigration, endless moral hectoring, racial oppression, and socially and racially dissolvent mass prostitution and white slavery euphemistically called “adult entertainment.”

To have our own countries back, and live among our own people again.

To be free—to think, speak, act, and govern ourselves as we choose!

An end to ubiquitous political police, jailers, spies, assassins, thugs, torturers, antifas, and a hateful mass media!

We abandoned routine torture and assassination centuries ago—we sloughed them off—but now they’re back with a vengeance, along with universal surveillance, heavy-handed censorship, and totalitarianism.

Thanks, but no thanks. Take your “blessings” and go.

The Sister Act Behind the WASP Mask

Behind the mask, Ann Landers (real name Esther Pauline “Eppie” Lederer, née Friedman) was a typical Jew. Born in Sioux City, Iowa to Ashkenazi immigrants from Russia (as early as 1920 her father owned a chain of movie theaters), she favored the legalization of prostitution, was pro-abortion and pro-homosexual, accused Joseph Kennedy of anti-Semitism, and insulted Pope John Paul II as “a Polack,” adding that Polacks are “very anti-women.”

She married Julius Lederer, a wealthy business executive who later co-founded Budget Rent-a-Car. From 1945 to 1949 (before she was a columnist), Landers was chairwoman of the Minnesota-Wisconsin region of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, a powerful spy organization opposed to free speech. During her newspaper years she lived on Chicago’s posh Lake Shore Drive in an opulent, 14-room high-rise apartment (link is to a sample condo in the building) with unsurpassed views of the city and Lake Michigan.

Landers’ identical twin sister was the equally famous syndicated advice columnist Pauline Esther (Friedman) Phillips, known to the world as “Abigail Van Buren” (“Dear Abby”) (1,400 newspapers, 110 million readers, and host of the daily “Dear Abby” CBS radio show). Note the oh-so-WASP-sounding cover names. One girl was christened Esther Pauline, the other Pauline Esther. “Abby” married Jewish liquor heir Morton B. Phillips of Minneapolis (Phillips Vodka).

What a coincidence. Two sisters who simultaneously started late in life at the very pinnacle of their chosen professions, with no previous newspaper or writing experience whatsoever, and for nearly half a century jointly instructed hundreds of thousands of Americans who spilled their most intimate secrets to them what to think and how to behave. It’s as if the fictional George Costanza had actually been granted his wish to become a TV color announcer without any background in either pro sports or broadcasting.

Strange stuff.

Let’s hope the women didn’t share any of the painfully intimate, deeply revealing confessions they received from hundreds of thousands of Americans in all walks of life with social science researchers or spies employed by some of their favorite organizations.


This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Greg Johnson
    Posted January 17, 2014 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    White Nationalism does not mean denigrating or spurning the real achievements of other races. It simply means racial separation and political sovereignty for whites and all other races. We can enjoy any and all Jewish and Black and Asian contributions to science and culture (and pay for them as we go, of course) without living among them, much less under their rule.

    • rhondda
      Posted January 17, 2014 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

      Yes, yes, this is very true, but Ann Landers and Dear Abby presented themselves as moral authorities for everyone. It was the same old ‘ for thee, but not for me’. Just as now Oprah Winfrey is regarded as some supreme moral authority and white women flock to her for advice and she knows even less than my cat. In fact, I prefer my cat’s meow. I had to separate myself from friends who thought Winfrey was more moral than they were. Good grief. Primal scream time.

      • Maple Leaf
        Posted January 19, 2014 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

        The mind control monster I call “Deepak Oprah”!

    • Armor
      Posted January 17, 2014 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

      “We can enjoy any and all Jewish and Black and Asian contributions to science and culture without living among them”

      That would be the best arrangement. We now have to do without many scientific, artistic and other intellectual contributions by White people who unfortunately were never born, due to the third-world invasion. But if Jews and Blacks were living in Palestine and Africa, and contributing their scientific inventions by e-mail, I think our life would improve, the White birth rate would go up again, and we would suddenly be more creative.

  2. Posted January 17, 2014 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    “It’s as if the fictional George Costanza had actually been granted his wish to become a TV color announcer without any background in either pro sports or broadcasting.”

    Sounds like a Supreme Court justice of recent vintage….

  3. Razvan
    Posted January 17, 2014 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Jews are used to steal everything including the reputation.

    Even A. Sabin is said to have invented the oral polio vaccine, it was in fact Hilary Koprowski who invented it

    Blumberg worked with Daniel Carleton Gajdusek

    Wassermann works are minor compared with havy lifting done by others: Fritz Schaudinn, Erich Hoffmann, Jules Bordet, and Octave Gengou. None of them a jew.
    Wassermann and Erhlich were students of Robert Koch – who wasn’t jew.

    It wasn’t Oskar Minkowski the discoverer of insulin but Nicolae Paulescu Paulescu was simply excluded by the Nobel Commetee because of his two great books: ‘Philosophic Physiology: The Hospital, the Koran, the Talmud, the Kahal and Freemasonry’, and ‘Degeneration of the Jewish Race’.

    Maybe they discovered some things, but they have to recognize that Europe and US gave them access to scientific resources, and that so many non-jews were involved or simply have been the firsts.
    Pretending they have all the merits it’s simply chutzpah.

    We can recognize any merit they might have, but we may not let them stealing from us nor let them bragg about that. Following their logic all the diabetic jews should stop using insulin, right now because of Paulescu.

    • me
      Posted January 17, 2014 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

      Razvan’s post should be sent to Dear Abby next time she publishes same or similar “Jews were first in this and that”.

  4. Stronza
    Posted January 17, 2014 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Don’t anybody here think for one moment that vaccines are some kind of “gift”. No, they are not. I didn’t have my kids done and myself refuse to take any. I was poisoned against my will as a child with these “health benefits” but that is water under the bridge. Look into it before you call me names. If vaccines are so hot, such a noble creation, why do the UK and the USA have vaccine damage compensation plans?

    No, there is no need to retort with some fantasy called “herd immunity”. Look that one up, also, if you can find a moment.

    If somebody can prove to me that illness is caused by lack of vaccination, I will submit myself to every one of these poisons, and the list of innoculations that babies and small children are subjected to is a long one. It is no accident that Landers/Levenson homed in on this supposed greatest of all gifts.

    • A.Ralston
      Posted January 20, 2014 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

      Adamantly agree. In part through their control of the money regime, Jewish financiers have imposed upon society the tyranny of the obscenely profitable pharmaceutical cartel and have actively suppressed research and practice of healing systems and modalities which are more “wholistic” and in the long-term more efficacious…but not as addictive and therfore not as lucrative to them.

  5. Jaego
    Posted January 17, 2014 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    Yes their strange control over us has an inectoid quality to it. Edward O Wilson talks of how some young Queens will change their scent to match the nest and them march right in and kill the Queen as the workers just look on. It gets worse: some seem able to hypnotize the workers into killing their Queen for her.

    The conditioning is very deep. I have experienced people defending the Jews in a way they never would their own people. The movie Ten Commandments is a masterpiece of propaganda – again and again the God like narrator condemns slavery – as if the Jews themselves weren’t slave owners.

    • Petronius
      Posted January 18, 2014 at 12:13 am | Permalink

      Well, what’s the problem in condemning slavery? Ten Commandements is all about the freedom of the slaves not the guilt of the slavekeepers, which are the Egyptians, and not the Old Testament Hebrews which are the good guys for the audience to identify, all played by white Americans who look like Charlton Heston. They are clearly stand-ins for “a free nation under Gawd”, the USA. While Cecil B. DeMille, a half-Jewish Episcopalian, certainly was a philosemite, Ten Commandents addresses rather White American bible belt conservatism/patriotism.

      • Jaego
        Posted January 19, 2014 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

        Yes, just as Ann and Abbie aren’t White, the Jews never renounced slavery – we did. The Jews try to equate themselves with Whites when it’s in their interest to do so. They do the opposite when that’s advantageous. Once people believed Jews were utterly against slavery since antiquity, Jews could trash Whites for being slave owner to their heart’s content.

  6. Bobby
    Posted January 17, 2014 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    I clearly remember once reading an article in which it was asserted that Jewish people do not believe in the collective guilt of the Germans for the Holocaust. Could have fooled me. I must have read that article thirty years ago, and since then, that’s all they seem to do– blame “all” Germans for the Holocaust. The articles author, whos name I simply cannot remember, even went on to say that “all of the medical advances and lives German science had saved, can never make up for what the Germans did. The author apparently didn’t notice that he was contradicting himself. Peace.

    • Jaego
      Posted January 20, 2014 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

      Ultimately we don’t know ourselves very well – no more than a character in a novel for the average person. It’s quite possible that Jews didn’t blame Germans and then were told to blame them and they did – quite sincerely. Their leaders manipulate them just as they do us. And likewise during the Holocaust Trial in Canada, Jews remembered things that never happened again and again – and were called on it for a change. Memory tends to merge with the imagination, Freud’s “primary process” or Paracelsus’s “cornerstone of fools”. Not the higher imagination which he knew of and Freud did not.

      Read an interesting paragraph by C.S Lewis. He recalled that while riding with soldiers on a train, that none of them believed the horror stories being told about Germany in the early days of the war. It was all just a bundle of lies. Yet he was shocked that none of them had the slightest resentment about this or the war as a whole. Complete acceptance of evil as the norm.

  7. Petronius
    Posted January 18, 2014 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    I think Hamilton is a bit over-reacting to this “Answer” and reading too much into it. I for my part find it neither insulting nor hateful. It is just a simple way to say to the most superficial of antisemites something like, hey the Jews have contributed good things, too. The argument presented here may be pretty useful in fact. Just reverse it when answering to anti-white bashing and show how white inventors showered the whole world with medical, technical, cultural benefits, and non- or anti-whites are using them all the time – now, that’s going to be a far longer list.

  8. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted January 18, 2014 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    The Jews use their “you can’t live without our inventions” argument as an answer to the boycott Israel movement too. They have even made a YouTube video to that effect (YouTube : boycotting Israel, by Jewlarious). This is simply part of their Chosen People complex. As the Chosen People they are intellectually and morally superior to all non-Jews, who – if not outright subhuman as per the Talmud – are hopelessly inferior to them. The poor retarded goyim simply cannot survive without the intellectual and moral guidance of the Jews. Therefore any form of anti-Semitism or anti-Zionism is a deluded rebellion against their ultimate benefactors. Humble goyim should always be conscious of this basic fact.

  9. Peter Quint
    Posted January 18, 2014 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    I think the most extreme example of the jewish mentality is Freud. The idea that every child wants to have sex with their parents is pretty weird. Another one is his fixation with feces and the defecation process. I too can usually spot a non-white piece of writing especially a when it’s a jew.

    • Peltast
      Posted January 19, 2014 at 7:58 am | Permalink

      Read what Carl Jung said about Freud family life, is going to freak you out.

      • Franklin Ryckaert
        Posted January 20, 2014 at 10:34 am | Permalink

        Jung himself wasn’t a paragon of virtue either. Wikipedia : “…Jung engaged in open relationships with other women. His extramarital relationships with patients and friends Sabina Spielrein and Tony Wolff were most widely known.” BTW, Sabina Spielrein was Jewish, Tony Wolff is rumored to have been half Jewish. Tony Wolff almost lived as Jung’s “second wife” with the family.

  10. Peter Quint
    Posted January 18, 2014 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    I would like to point out that it is not just jews instructing us now. Whites have become so degenerate from chistianity that blacks like Oprah Winfrey have become authorities on white morality.

  11. molly maguire
    Posted January 18, 2014 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    As I think of it, I have heard the ” be grateful for our contributions “line, every so often before.

    Silly me, I did not know that Ann Landers was Jewish, I thought she was really Ann Landers

  12. Justin Huber
    Posted January 19, 2014 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Laura Schlessinger. She’s another Jewess busy body I can’t stand.

  13. RileyDeWiley
    Posted January 20, 2014 at 4:00 am | Permalink

    It is not at all unlikely that many of “Landers” and “Abby’s” correspondence was forged – written by the women themselves or writers on their staff. It’s as real as Penthouse Forum.

    I have similar doubts about Dan Savage, the gay advice columnist in Seattle, our new moral avatar.

  14. Mike
    Posted January 20, 2014 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Hamilton,

    I thought you would like this:

    Apparently all criticism of Pajama Boy is pent up antisemitism.

  15. Armor
    Posted January 20, 2014 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

    “if you are going to be an anti-Semite you should be consistent and turn your back on the medical advances that Jews made possible.”

    That is the kind of automatic response we get not just when we float the idea of sending the Jews back to Palestine, which we almost never do, but simply when we complain about their control of the media. It means that Jews have a right to control government and the media because they are so smart. Einstein’s invention of relativity means that even Jews who didn’t invent anything have a right to own our media and government. It also legitimizes the ideal of a heavily stratified society with Jews at the top (together with a few token Whites), and “White trash” at the bottom, together with the Blacks.

    I think the ”be grateful for our contributions“ line is inconsistent with the other Jewish line, which is: “Yes, we own the media. So what? It doesn’t make any difference.”

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace