Print this post Print this post

Diabolical Passion:
Ariel Toaff’s Blood Passovers

Francesco Oradini, Martyrdom of Simon of Trent, bas relief, 18th century, Palazzo Salvadori, Trent

4,211 words

German translation here

The Jewish festival of Passover begins today at sundown. Outside Israel it lasts for eight days.

In the Christian calendar, today is Good Friday, the anniversary of Christ’s crucifixion, immediately preceding Easter Sunday.

In the Passover story, the Jews smeared lamb’s blood on their dwellings so that God, in the process of killing the first-born Gentile children of Egypt, could identify, and thus pass over or spare, Jewish children. (It is curious that even God requires a sign to distinguish Jews from non-Jews.)

Pasque di sangue: Ebrei d’Europa e omicidi rituali (Blood Passovers: European Jews and Ritual Murder) (Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino, 2007), by Israeli medievalist Ariel Toaff, is the story of this festival among medieval German Jews (Ashkenazim), the bizarre rite of alleged crucifixion and cannibalism (technically, ritual hematophagia—consumption of human blood) associated with it from medieval times to at least the time of the Mendel Beilis trial in Russia in 1911.

Blood Passovers was written and published in Italian. Only a pirated English translation is available. Extensive original source quotations in the footnotes are in Latin, but large portions of these, in brackets, have been translated into English in the pirate copy. The English edition contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

The book’s mainstream Italian publisher currently sells a revised, bowdlerized edition with a new Afterword (in English, online) that Toaff issued in 2008 after swiftly suppressing the original edition under intense pressure after the initial run of 1,000 copies sold out in a single day. Even the American Jewish Committee’s hostile reviewer had to use a pirated copy to write his review.

This review relies upon the unauthorized online translation of the 2007 first edition made by Gian Marco Lucchese and Pietro Gianetti, available in PDF and text formats on various websites. I found the book easy to read on my Kindle. A PDF version is obtainable at the website of Israel Shamir, a Jewish convert to Christianity, here.

At the time of the book’s initial publication, Toaff, born in 1942, was professor of Medieval and Renaissance History at Bar Ilan University in Ramat-Gan, Israel.

His previous books include The Jews in Medieval Assisi, 1305-1487: A Social and Economic History of a Small Jewish Community (1979), The Mediterranean and the Jews (1989), The Jews in Umbria (1993), and Mostri giudei: L’immaginario ebraico dal Medioevo alla prima età moderna (Italian; Jewish Monsters: The Jewish Imaginary from the Middle Ages to the Early Modern Era) (1996).

Subsequently he has published Il prestigiatore di Dio: avventure e miracoli di un alchimista ebreo nelle corti del Rinascimento (Italian; The Magician of God) (Milan: Rizzoli, 2010), about a 16th century Italian Jewish alchemist, Abraham Colorni.

Furious Reaction

A single positive review of Blood Passovers appeared before the roof fell in. Italian Jewish historian Sergio Luzatto praised it in Italy’s prestigious Corriere della Sera newspaper as a “magnificent book of history.” Toaff, wrote Luzatto, established that “from 1100 to about 1500 . . . several crucifixions of Christian children really happened . . . Neither in Trent in 1475 nor in other areas of Europe in the late Middle Ages were Jews always innocent victims.”

But the hostile international reaction to the publication of Toaff’s book was violent and instantaneous.

Toaff is the son of Elio Toaff (b. 1915), the former Chief Rabbi of Rome known as “the Pope of the Jews.” In 1986 Pope John Paul II prayed at the Synagogue of Rome with Elio —reportedly the first-ever visit by a Pope to a synagogue. The visit is said to have paved the way for the subsequent establishment of diplomatic ties between Israel and the Vatican.

Toaff’s 92-year-old father told the Italian newspaper la Repubblica after the publication of his son’s controversial book: “The criticism that everyone has expressed about his book was justified. His arguments were an insult to the intelligence, to the tradition, to history in general and to the meaning of the Jewish religion. It saddens me that such nonsense was put forward by my son of all people.”

Bar Ilan University came under massive pressure from the ADL, wealthy Jewish fundraisers in the US, members of the Knesset (Israeli parliament), and virtually everyone else, to fire Toaff.

The university quickly buckled under the pressure and condemned his work. Toaff offered to resign, but according to newspaper accounts was scheduled to resign at the end of 2007 anyway. Whether he remains associated with Bar Ilan as a professor, emeritus professor, or in some other capacity is unclear. His publisher’s website implies that he still teaches there, which seems doubtful.

The Medieval Ashkenazim

Haaretz claimed, disingenuously or ignorantly, that Italian Jews were disturbed that Toaff highlighted “blood libel” accusations “within Italy itself—as if the objective were to spit in the community’s face by impugning it with the worst accusation of all.”

But no reader of Toaff’s book could possibly mistake it as an attack against the Italian Jewish community (unless it is predominantly Ashkenazic today). If anything, it is an Italian apologia. The author distinguishes sharply between Italian Jews and the Ashkenazim of northern Italy accused of ritual murder. As Hillel Halkin put it:

This was a community that was Ashkenazi and Yiddish-speaking, composed of relatively recent immigrants from the Germanic lands beyond the Alps, and throughout Pasque di Sangue, Toaff contrasts it with the “real” Italian Jews to the south of the Po River who had lived in the country for centuries or more and were well-integrated. Unlike the southerners, the Ashkenazim of the north . . . were, in Toaff’s description, insular, conspiratorial, hostile toward Gentiles, highly competitive in their business practices (many engaged in banking and money-lending), and extreme in their religious beliefs.

The dichotomy between the relaxed, at-home-in-the-world Italian Jew and the rigid, xenophobic northerner is central to Toaff’s book. . . . (Although Italian Jewry was never, strictly speaking, “Sephardi,” it was closer in its rituals and liturgy to the Jewish communities of the Mediterranean than to those of the European interior.) Toaff’s “real” Italian Jews are the “good Jews” of his story as opposed to the “bad Jews” from beyond the Alps, with their “aggressive economic entrepreneurship” and “lack of respect for the laws of the country.” Jews south of the Po, Pasque di Sangue repeatedly stresses, never suffered from the blood libel that was repeatedly hurled against the Jews of German-speaking lands, and they had none of the fascination with suffering, martyrdom, and blood that runs through the religious culture of late-medieval German Jewry.

The Ashkenazim of northern Italy were deeply enmeshed in assassinations, disobedience to the law, fraudulent dealing, high-level political intrigue, and what today would be called white-collar crime. Mention is made of Jewish bankers in Padua lending at usurious rates in excess of 40%. Indeed, some individuals profiled by Toaff differ not one whit from contemporary “leading citizens” such as Robert Maxwell.

Despite their high status, wealth, literacy, and many social, financial, and political advantages, the Ashkenazim were imbued with deep anti-Christian hatred, and perversely primitive and benighted in their fundamentalist, cultic religious beliefs and practices.

Indeed, much of their behavior sounds all too familiar. Mention is made of an imprisoned Jewish physician (note his high-status occupation) under indictment in 1452 for vilification of the Christian religion and attempted bribery:

His Christian fellow prisoners accused him of serious offenses and blasphemies against the Christian religion. According to the denunciation, Abba, in his cell, was alleged to have unhesitatingly placed his filthy piss-pot right below the crucifix. Soundly rebuked by the other prisoners, the intemperate Candiota was said to have replied with profanity, insulting them and shamelessly ridiculing Jesus the Messiah and the blessed Holy Virgin. His condemnation was inevitable and well-deserved: one year’s additional prison time, in addition to the payment of a fine of one thousand lire.

Shades of Larry David, Family Guy, and South Park!

Quite apart from anything Toaff says about ritual murder, his book is valuable for the overall picture it paints of medieval Ashkenazic Jewry (a subject to which much of his text is devoted). Though centered in Germany, Ashkenazim also comprised the medieval Jewish populations of France, northern Italy, northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and even England. In medieval times, Toaff writes, their overall numbers were significantly smaller than those of the Sephardim (Iberian Jews) and Italian and Oriental Jews.

Since the people (both rabbinic and secular) implicated in the Trent and other ritual murder cases were high status, wealthy, powerful members of their communities, Toaff’s at times exculpatory comments (especially following the almost-immediate suppression of the first edition of his book) to the effect that only a few marginal, extremist Ashkenazi sects or individuals were involved is constantly belied by his own evidence.

Nor were the numbers of defendants small. Over 100 people were allegedly involved in the murder of Hugh of Lincoln in 1255, 20 of whom were executed. The Jewish community of Lincoln had supposedly been chosen that year in a Europe-wide conclave of Ashkenazim that met annually in medieval times to decide by lottery which community was responsible for obtaining the year’s child sacrifice.

Thus, it would be more truthful to say, as the author does at one point, that some Ashkenazim strongly opposed ritual murder and Passover blood ceremonies.

Ritual Crucifixion

Jews have been accused of committing ritual murders for centuries.

Ritual murder accusations have been made against the Jews for thousands of years. The murders were sometimes alleged to have been accompanied by ritual cannibalism, but not always. In every case, it is rather improbable that the testimonies which have come down to us from antiquity were known and disseminated in the Middle Ages and could constitute a significant point of reference for later accusations of crucifixion and ritual cannibalism. (Chapter Eight, “Distant Precedents and the Saga of Purim.”)

The earliest medieval charge of a ritual Passover crucifixion pertained to the mutilated body of 12-year-old William of Norwich in England in 1144. Some years afterward Thomas of Monmouth recorded details of the crime. Jews refer to his account as the “source” of the “blood libel.”

Interestingly, Toaff believes that Christian fear of child abduction in Europe predated the earliest cases of ritual crucifixion.

Perhaps the widespread fear that Jews were scheming to abduct children, subjecting them to cruel rituals, even antedates the appearance of stereotypical ritual murder which seems to have originated in the 12th century. As for myself, I believe that serious consideration should be given to the possibility that this fear was largely related to the slave trade, particularly in the 9th and 10th centuries, when the Jewish role in the slave trade appears to have been preponderant.

During this period, Jewish merchants, from the cities in the valley of the Rhône, Verdun, Lione, Arles and Narbonne, in addition to Aquisgrana, the capital of the empire in the times of Louis the Pious [Louis I]; and in Germany from the centres of the valley of the Rhine, from Worms, Magonza and Magdeburg; in Bavaria and Bohemia, from Regensburg and Prague—were active in the principal markets in which slaves (women, men, eunuchs) were offered for sale, by Jews, sometimes after abducting them from their houses. From Christian Europe the human merchandise was exported to the Islamic lands of Spain, in which there was a lively market. The castration of these slaves, particularly children, raised their prices, and was no doubt a lucrative and profitable practice.

It has been maintained that allegations of ritual crucifixion preceded charges of ritual cannibalism (hematophagia) by a century. Gruesome ritual mutilations and crucifixions of Christian boys at Passover were done in mockery of Christ’s crucifixion. Charges of ritual cannibalism, on the other hand, did not arise until a child murder that occurred in Fulda, Germany in 1235. Toaff, however, believes the two practices were probably associated from the beginning. (Chapter Seven, “Crucifixion and Ritual Cannibalism: From Norwich to Fulda.”)

Ritual Cannibalism

To fully understand the anthropological context of ritual cannibalism, see my short summary of the general, non-Jewish background of human cannibalism here (scroll down to the appropriate sub-heading). Magical cannibalism has frequently been engaged in by primitive peoples against their enemies.

To Israel Wolfgang, a defendant in the Trent ritual murder case (the main case studied by Toaff),

it was clear that the Torah and later rabbinical regulations presupposed two different moral codes, one applying to the Jewish world, and the other applicable to the surrounding Christian world, which was different and often hostile and menacing. Therefore, that which was prohibited between Jews was not necessarily prohibited in relations between Jews and Christians. . . . With a bold analogy, which we decline to believe was extorted by [the] judges . . . , Israel Wolfgang maintained that even the Biblical prohibition against human blood was absolute for Jews, and rigid when it involved blood extracted from the veins of Jews, but was permitted and even recommended when originating from the body of Christians, or Christian children in particular.

Essentially, the idea is that the Ashkenazim dissolved in wine and kneaded into the unleavened bread consumed during the Passover celebration small quantities of dried, pulverized blood. The blood, extracted from the veins of baptized Christian children, was supplied by Jewish merchants.

The blood of the Christian child

was extracted during the course of a memorial ritual of the passion of Jesus, as a sign of contempt and scorn for the Christian religion. Over the course of this counterritual, the innocent boy, who had to be less than seven years old and had to be a boy, like Jesus [the blood of a girl, even if younger than 7, would not suffice], was crucified among torments and expressions of execration, as had happened to Christ. Another praiseworthy addition was circumcision, to make the symbolic similarity more obvious and significant.

Understandably, blood of this kind was extremely expensive, and because the temptation to defraud was so high, purchasers demanded certificates of authenticity issued by trusted rabbinical authorities, analogous to kosher food certificates today.

The use of the blood of Christian children in the celebration of the Jewish Passover was apparently the object of minute regulation, at least according to the depositions of all the defendants in the Trent trials. These depositions describe exactly what was prohibited, what was permitted, and what was tolerated, all in meticulous detail. Every eventuality was foreseen and dealt with; the use of blood was governed by broad and exhaustive [Jewish] case law, almost as if it formed an integral part of the most firmly established regulations relating to the ritual. . . .

The obligation to procure blood and to use it during the Passover ritual was the exclusive responsibility of the head of the family, i.e., a responsible male with a dependent wife and children. Bachelors, widowers, guests and employees, all those without dependent family, were exempt. In view of the difficulty of procuring such a rare and costly ingredient, it was anticipated that the wealthiest Jews would provide blood for the poorest Jews, an eccentric form of charity benefiting heads of families disinherited by fate.

Goi katan, ‘little Christian’, the expression used in referring to the ritual murder victim, who was usually nameless, is said to have been used during the act of adding his blood to the symbolic foods to be exhibited and consumed in the Seder dinner.”

The use of Christian blood in this way constituted an “anti-ritual”—”an upside-down memorial to the Passion of Christ.”

The Passover Seder also incorporated violent invectives against Christians: “Vomit your anger onto the nations . . . Turn your anger upon them, reach them with your scorn; persecute them with fury, cause them to perish from beneath the divine heaven.” “The meaning was obvious,” Toaff writes. “Messianic redemption could only be built upon the ruins of the hated Gentile world.”

In Chapter Six, “Magical and Therapeutic Uses of Blood,” Toaff describes additional cannibalistic customs. They involved drinking drops of blood dissolved in wine of newly circumcised Jewish infants and, more bizarrely, the consumption by women without male offspring of the circumcised infants’ foreskin in the magical belief that it would enable them to become pregnant. The latter custom, Toaff says, was “highly widespread” among the medieval Ashkenazim, likening it to contemporary competitions after weddings to seize the bride’s bouquet.

The women present at the circumcision ceremony but not yet blessed with progeny of the male sex, anxiously awaited the cutting of the foreskin of the child. At this point, throwing inhibition to the winds, as if at a pre-established signal, the women hurled themselves upon that piece of bloody flesh. The luckiest woman is alleged to have snatched it up and gulped it down immediately, before she could be mobbed by the competing females.

Interestingly, Toaff refers to the consumption of Haman pastries at Purim as being “symbolically cannibalistic”—something to recall the next time you hear some Jew sneer about consuming “the body and blood of Christ” in the sacrament of Holy Communion.

While Toaff mentions various ritual murder accusations over the centuries, the focus of his book is the murder of little Simon in Trent, Italy.

The Case of Simon of Trent

Castello del Buonconsiglio outside

The Catholic Church, which long ago beatified Simon of Trent, withdrew the child’s status as a religious martyr in 1965 as part of Pope Paul VI’s Nostra Aetate proclamation at the notoriously philo-Semitic Second Vatican Council.

It appears that saints can be “de-sainted,” just as “Holocaust deniers” can retroactively lose their academic degrees. As a consequence, Simon no longer appears in the Roman Martyrology, or on any modern Catholic calendar.

On March 23, the eve of Passover 1475, the mutilated body of Simonino, the two-year old son of tanner Andrea Lomferdorm, was found in the waters of a ravine by-passing a wealthy Jew’s cellar. The discovery triggered an inquest that led to the charges brought against the Jews of Trent for the child’s abduction and murder. They were interrogated in Buonconsiglio Castle, confessed, and were condemned. Following the verdict, the convicted Jews were publicly executed and their property was confiscated.

The extensive trial documentation in the Trent case enabled Toaff to undertake a detailed examination of the confessions of the accused. “The transcripts of the Trent trials for the murder of Simon,” he writes, “are said to constitute the most important and detailed document ever written on the ritual murder accusation, a precious document retaining the words of the Hebrew defendants.”

Toaff refers sporadically to “depositions” of the defendants, “an authenticated copy” by a notary, documents “signed, sealed, and dated,” the “dossier” of the trial records, and letters in Yiddish preserved in the trial records—”the most ancient remaining documents in Yiddish.” In addition, extensive quotations in Latin from the various documents are printed in the footnotes. Toaff observes:

It should be obvious that only someone with a very good knowledge of the Seder ritual, an insider, could describe the [precise] order of gestures and operations as well as the Hebrew formulae used during the various phases of the celebration, and be capable of supplying such [a wealth of] detailed and precise descriptions and explanations. The judges at Trent could barely follow these descriptions, forming a vague idea of the ritual, which was so foreign to their experience and knowledge that they could only reconstitute it in [the form of] nebulous and imperfect images. The Italian notaries, then, had their work cut out for them in [attempting] to cut their way through this jungle of incomprehensible Hebrew terms, pronounced with a heavy German accent. . . . Imagining that the judges dictated these descriptions of the Seder ritual, with the related liturgical formulae in Hebrew, does not seem very believable.

According to the testimony of the defendants, on the Sabbath immediately after Simon’s murder, “when the child’s body was placed on the almemor [a desk in the synagogue on which the Torah is placed while being read to the congregation], the Jews of Trent, gathered in the synagogue, abandoned themselves to excessive gestures absolutely without inhibition or restraint.” The rabbi, “after concluding his fiery anti-Christian sermon against Jesus and His Mother, rushed up to the almemor, and, after ‘doing the fig'” [an obscene hand gesture signifying sexual intercourse performed before the eyes of the dead child], slapped the corpse of the 2-year-old in the face and spat upon it. Other members of the congregation (women were also present) followed suit, slapping, biting, and spitting upon the mutilated body, making faces and obscene gestures. One man, “coarsely raising his caftan, displayed his buttocks [and genitals] shamelessly.”

According to Toaff, the dead Christian child in Passover rituals “and the Crucified Christ were one and the same person.” Thus, “Simon did not exist—if he had ever existed—and, in his place, they saw the Talui, Jesus the hanged, and the Teluiah, the hanged or crucified woman, as Mary was called . . . Almost trance-like, they cursed and swore, performed contemptuous and obscene gestures.”

The Jews of Italy were not cowed by the gruesome charges brought against their coreligionists. Rather, they rallied around the defendants, conniving and scheming endlessly to free them. They bribed powerful Christian officials to interfere in the proceedings, pressured Archduke Sigismund of Austria to free the defendants (he did temporarily suspend the judicial proceedings), won the release of the female defendants by applying pressure to Pope Sixtus IV, criminally schemed to break the prisoners out of jail, and attempted to hire the most prominent and successful Christian lawyer of the day.

The Jews also instituted legal proceedings against the prime mover behind the trials, the Prince-Bishop of the independent Bishopric of Trent, an ecclesiastical state of the Holy Roman Empire in what is now northern Italy, called Giovanni Hinderbach by Toaff, and Johannes Hinderbach or John V von Hinderbach by other sources, accusing him of attempting to misappropriate the defendants’ property.

When all of these subterfuges failed, the Jewish community arranged for a Jewish convert trusted by Hinderbach to kill the Prince-Bishop by poisoning his food, in spite of Hinderbach’s precaution of employing three food tasters. The would-be assassin was caught and executed.

Did Such Things Really Happen?

Jewish partisans doggedly assert that accounts of ritual crucifixions and hematophagia are “blood libels” against eternally innocent, victimized Jews committed by irredeemably evil Christians.

As the ADL states for the benefit of its audience, which it considers stupid: “The accusation was made out of whole cloth and reflected the tendency in Medieval Europe, based on Christian anti-Jewish doctrine, to demonize Jews and blame them for problems in society.”

Such dim-witted posturing requires one to accept not only that Jews are excessively moral, which they decidedly are not, but that whites across the millennia falsified outlandish accusations against Jews for no reason whatsoever. The charge is preposterous on the face of it, enitrely out of character. In fact, such accusations are the specialty of Jews. That’s why governments eradicate freedom of inquiry and impose “Holocaust denial” and “hate speech” laws. Malevolent fabrications cannot withstand objective scrutiny, and Jews and governments know it.

Toaff, however, is quite cagey, never outright saying that ritual crucifixions and cannibalism actually took place. Yet, through an array of rhetorical devices and narrative techniques he certainly implies that, at least at times, they did. A credulous adherent of the Persecution Myth—the belief that Gentiles, especially whites, Europeans, and Christians, mindlessly persecute innocent Jews for no reason—Toaff seems to feel that Ashkenazic fanaticism was perhaps an understandable response to persecution.

Toaff’s endless dodges, evasiveness, and recantations under pressure remind me a lot of David Irving’s scholarly and PR handling of lethal “Holocaust denial” accusations. Nevertheless, both men have clearly slipped outside the barbed wire enclosure where run-of-the-mill intellectuals, historians, academics, and journalists contentedly graze.

Toaff’s critics like to focus on the alleged use of torture as automatically negating ritual murder charges. Thus, Jewish apologists write that “Toaff’s citing the ‘testimony’ of Jews allegedly admitting to the use of Christian blood for Jewish ritual purposes is absurd on its face since these Jews were tortured and anything they said was under duress and not to be taken seriously.”

Toaff indicates that some (not all) of the testimony of the defendants in the Trent case was obtained through torture. Curiously, however, he provides no historical background about the use of torture in late-15th century Italian legal proceedings, or even evidence of the specific tortures allegedly employed in this case. This is a significant oversight.

In his 2008 Afterword, the author takes aim at the torture excuse by citing contrary scholarly treatment of different confessions obtained by similar means in Inquisitorial and witchcraft trials.

Frankly, Jews lack grounds for credibly objecting to the reliability of confessions obtained by torture. Today, in pursuit of Zionist objectives in the Middle East Israel, the US, and European governments routinely torture prisoners on the grounds that it is necessary and effective. They use it, they say, to extract the truth.

Israel Shamir consequently pointed out that such “arguments” against Toaff are implicitly anti-Zionist (and hence anti-Semitic) because, if taken seriously, they would release Palestinian prisoners from Jewish jails, are anti-American because the US recognizes the value of torture and practices it, and amount to Holocaust denial since they would invalidate many of the verdicts handed down at Nuremberg.

Given the absence of objective, unrestricted inquiry into Jewish matters past and present, it will be some time, if ever, before significant progress will be made in unraveling the mystery of Jewish ritual murders—or alleged murders.


This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted April 6, 2012 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Every time I am reading an article here that I enjoy, halfway through I think “Hmm. Let me check who wrote this…” and most of the time it’s you. Thank you for picking such interesting topics and sharing your knowledge in a clear and succinct manner.

    I really don’t know what to make of all this. It is deeply disturbing.

  2. Lew
    Posted April 6, 2012 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    The list of Jewish atrocities is long indeed.

    In reading this post, I was reminded of my favorite essay by Harold Covington. It is about Jewish ritual murder.

    Our medieval ancestors were not fools. They lived with the Jews side by side in close-packed urban communities, very small by modern standards, and knew the Jews far more intimately than we do today. Just like people today, they cared about their children and when a child was slain the entire community interested itself not only for purposes of revenge, but to ensure the safety of everyone’s kids. We are asked to believe that time and again, insular communities who discovered they had a child-killer in their midst stubbornly refused to apprehend the alleged Gentile “real killers” and blamed the Jews out of religious bigotry. What possible interest could any community, medieval or otherwise, have in lynching an innocent scapegoat and allowing a real killer of children to go free? Why would everyone in Trier or Lincoln or Spoleto or Kiev go along with such a miscarriage of justice when doing so put other children at risk? Why (so far as we know) did the child-killings cease once the Jews had been punished and (usually) driven from the community?

    The Jewish people are entirely capable of practicing ritual murder, and there is an immense amount of historical evidence that they did so. I cannot imagine why they would stop now in this day and age, when they have the power to conceal their misdeeds and the captive media falsely to portray them as victims. How many of those little children you see on milk cartons have fallen victim to the knives of the rabbis and lie buried in some remote wasteland or were ground up into dog food in some Jewish-owned processing plant? I am convinced that at least some of them met that fate.

    Jews are foul, sick and above all EVIL.

  3. rhondda
    Posted April 6, 2012 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    The PDF to which you linked was very interesting, especially around the use of torture and determining valid information and magical cursing rituals. The books I have read on the inquisition are all so contradictory. Toaff’s precision of thought is impressive and doesn’t leave much wriggle room. The whole book must be fascinating. I am so jealous. I wanted to ask what was he was forced to write? What are they afraid of?
    I had never heard of religious anthropology before this.

    There was on the news this week a story about two boys and a women ritually murdered to La Muerte in Mexico, so the idea is not a myth and it was apparently a rite.

  4. Free Man
    Posted April 7, 2012 at 4:44 am | Permalink

    “Shades of Larry David, Family Guy, and South Park!”

    Made me remember why I stopped watching television/movies.

  5. Posted April 7, 2012 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Flavia, Mr. Hamilton. Your articles are first rate.

    One thing I’d like to learn more about is the division of Jews into Ashkenazim, Sephardim and the seeming middle group that Toaff puts Roman and some other Italian Jews into.

    Thinking of the geography, I would think Toaff’s group would be Sephardic. Could you enlighten us on that, please?

    Finally, I have to agree with Lew as well. Within Jews, there is evil. I guess it shouldn’t be a surprise since 2,000 years ago St. John said it so clearly right in his gospel. I guess we should still be taking that literally today.

    • Andrew Hamilton
      Posted April 8, 2012 at 11:08 am | Permalink

      Yes, the divisions are important.

      I am not entirely clear about the provenance of the Italian Jews, although I do know they weren’t Sephardim or Ashkenazim. I suspect Hillel Halkin’s brief reference, quoted above, supplies a clue:

      “. . . ‘real’ Italian Jews to the south of the Po River who had lived in the country for centuries or more and were well-integrated . . . Although Italian Jewry was never, strictly speaking, ‘Sephardi,’ it was closer in its rituals and liturgy to the Jewish communities of the Mediterranean than to those of the European interior.”

      Possibly Italian Jews had lived in Italy since Roman times, and become relatively acculturated (though still apart, of course) over the centuries.

      Toaff is writing about the Middle Ages up to c. 1475. So, the question is what has happened since then?

      It appears that Toaff, an older man, still considered Italian Jews to be distinct from Ashkenazim until recently. (It is my impression that he implicitly includes himself in that category, for example.)

      However, I recall reading that some Sephardim settled in Italy after their expulsion from Spain and Portugal—in other words, after the dates Toaff is writing about. Of course, they settled in many other places as well, predominantly, I believe, in the Ottoman Empire, including Turkey.

      Such Sephardim probably ultimately mixed with Oriental Jews—a large, genetically heterogeneous group. Kevin MacDonald in one of his books has a footnote about Oriental Jews. They have lower average IQs than Ashkenazim. Sephardic Jews, like whites today, probably also stopped reproducing (exhibited below replacement fertility).

      I think there are very few, if any, genuine Sephardim (Jews of purely Iberian descent) left in the world today. Demographically their numbers must be insignificant. After the expulsions, the Sephardic population declined precipitously, while Ashkenazic Jews experienced a population explosion. Those designated “Sephardim” today are not the original Sephardim, but Jews, primarily Oriental, I think, who follow Sephardic religious rituals (which differ from Ashkenazic rites).

      Today, roughly 90% of the world’s Jews are Ashkenazim. So possibly they now constitute a significant proportion of the Italian Jewish population as well (or not).

      By the way, I mentioned South Park based on the information in your articles. I’ve never seen it!

      • Posted April 8, 2012 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

        Mr. Hamilton, thank you for your kind reply.

        Interesting that Sephardim used to outnumber Ashkenazim. Albert Lindemann makes a key point about that, as can be seen in the title of his masterpiece, “Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews.” In part, he means that literally, with the surge in numbers of Jews in Eastern Europe.

  6. Posted April 7, 2012 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Even today – and despite the Jewish MSM smother of such events – Jewish killings of young White Christians have a Ritualistic aspect: particularly as regards the draining of blood and cannibalism. A (briefly) celebrated 1960s case in New Jersey involved one Joseph Kallinger, who murdered a young woman by slitting her throat, then slowly draining her boood while his son watched. During the 1970s, a New York Jew named Jules Plehvy lured a Christian girl to his apartment, stripped her, tied her face down spread-eagled to a bed-frame and, after sodomizing the girl, slit her throat and drained the blood into a bowl. Plehvy was in fact arrested after his victim’s butchered body was found in several plastic garbage bags…and then the case slipped from view; I believe he lawyered up, copped an “insanity” plea, served a couple of years in the bin, then walked. In 1996, one “Nathaniel Bar-Jonah kidnapped a 10-year-old boy (Zachery Ramsey), raped and butchered him, then fed his remains to unsuspecting neighbors” (Santa Barbara News-Press, 21 Dec. 2000, p. A5). So these Jewish atrocities are not only medieval history, they occur here and now and – given the near-lock the Jews have on media and public discourse – much more frequently than any of us know. And, of course, the Jews also have gotten the Blacks to do much of their White-butchering by proxy: cf. the Knoxville Horror and similar daily events surpressed by the Jew MSM.

  7. Jon
    Posted April 8, 2012 at 3:02 am | Permalink

    I’ve always wondered if Charles Lindbergh jr. was a victim of blood libel. The implications are quite disturbing.

    Gruesome stuff.

  8. MOB
    Posted April 8, 2012 at 6:13 am | Permalink

    The Messianic Movement Smuggles Zionism into the Mainline Church
    Stealing Easter from Jesus

  9. Dutchman
    Posted April 8, 2012 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    A possible connection to the ritual murder of children may exist in antiquity. Today I came across an old book I have on the city of Carthage, ancient enemy of the Romans and Greeks alike. Both Roman and Greek writers across the centuries have mentioned the sacrifice of children to the god Baal and the goddess Tanit. Baal was called Chronus by the Classical authors. Carthage was founded by Phoenecians from the city of Tyre and were Semites. There may be some relationship to the Cathaginian sacrifice of children and the Bibilical child sacrifice of the Israelites to the god Moloch. The Carthaginians erected stelae over their sacrifices that often have the initials ‘MLK’ which at least one archaeologist has suggested is the word ‘moloch’. He views ‘moloch’ as the act of sacrificing a child, and not the name of the god Baal. It is a strange coincidence that ‘MLK’ is now our own false idol that we are required to worship and sacrifice our children’s minds to. In any case the child sacrifice in ancient Lebanon/Palestine was surpressed by the Persians and the same rituals in Carthage persisted during the Roman era until Tiberius crucified the priests of Baal, but it was suspected to have still been carried on in secret.

  10. Posted April 10, 2012 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Would it be possible to know the origin, location, etc… of the illustration ? Many thanks in advance.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted April 10, 2012 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

      I am sorry, but I found it online, and there was no attribution.

    • White Republican
      Posted April 11, 2012 at 1:37 am | Permalink

      Philippe Régniez,

      This is off-topic, but I’d like to know if you got Saint-Loup’s book Hitler ou Juda? from Akribeia, and if you did, what you think of it. I think it’s brilliant.

      • Posted April 11, 2012 at 11:47 am | Permalink

        White Republican,

        No, I haven’t got the book. However Saint Loup is a most interesting writer, almost forgotten nowadays. The mere mention of his name draws exclamations of horror from the contemporary official critics and intellectuals who, as you may well imagine, have never read a single line of his work.

        However, thanks for the tip. So much stuff to read !

      • White Republican
        Posted April 12, 2012 at 1:01 am | Permalink

        I think the print catalogues of Akribeia have used the category “condemned writers” (maudits écrivains) for works relating to such writers.

        A telling sign of the intellectual decadence of France is that Bernard Henri-Lévy has been able to posture as an “intellectual” for decades. It would be good if someone could do more than throw a cream pie — as has been repeatedly done by Noel Godin (“L’Entarteur”) — into the face of this Jewish charlatan.

        When I recommend books to people, I usually find that they either don’t read a lot and aren’t interested in reading, or they read a lot and don’t have the time to read as much as they’d like. It’s usually one extreme or the other: bibliophobes or bibliophiles. Either way, people remain ignorant of many works and ideas of great interest and value.

        It’s worth thinking about what these things mean for the promotion of books and ideas, for framing the discourse of a movement, and for fashioning the culture of a movement. In intellectual and cultural terms, it’s as if we’re in a derelict building in which many things need to be repaired, replaced, and rebuilt. There is no shortage of material for restoring or renovating the building, and much of it is ready to hand, but it needs to be properly fashioned and put into place.

        In these matters, it’s necessary to work with many media at a collective level, so that there are multiple channels for the diffusion of media and ideas. Of course, there are several difficulties with this:

        1. Resources for producing such media are limited and competition for resources is severe.

        2. People need to specialize in particular areas in order to work effectively, can’t do all the work themselves needed to use multiple channels effectively, and are often oblivious to the value of media or genres other than those in which they work or which interest them. They are prone to view work in other channels as unnecessary, as a distraction, and as a dead loss rather than as an investment.

        3. Work can’t be performed according to an “apparatus logic.” It’s not as if a Five-Year Plan for producing media can be followed. Producers of media can’t be regulated in such a way.

        Work needs to be done at many levels and in many forms. There is a need for theoretical work, for educational work, and for agitational work. There is a need to use many media. There is a need to understand that all this work and all these media have their place, that they are complementary, and that they have their own characteristics and should be used and assessed accordingly.

    • Ulf Larsen
      Posted April 11, 2012 at 2:11 am | Permalink

      The illustration is of the murder of Simon of Trent, in Palazzo Salvadori.

  11. White Republican
    Posted April 11, 2012 at 1:46 am | Permalink

    A question for Andrew Hamilton: do you know if Elliott Horowitz’s book, Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence, is worth reading?

    There’s a historical survey of incidents of ritual murder in Philip de Vier’s book, Blood Ritual.

    I’ve sometimes thought that ritual murder is a relatively minor charge against the Jews — the other things they do in our political, economic, and cultural life are far more destructive — but the extreme cruelty, superstition, and wickedness such crimes express is truly shocking and concrete. Apparently the scene in the film Der ewige Jude that really makes the blood of viewers boil is the scene showing a kosher butcher slaughtering a cow. Perhaps the real reason why Jews commit such cruelties is not because their religion commands it (“G-d told us to do it”), but because they enjoy it.

    • Andrew Hamilton
      Posted April 11, 2012 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

      From the references to Horowitz’s book that I have seen, I suspect it would be worth reading. While it is marred by the usual Jewish apologetics, it is apparently more informative than most books by Jews.

      Israel Shamir mentioned Reckless Rites in connection with Toaff’s book, though calling it “admittedly more timid.”

      In the Hillel Halkin article linked to above, Halkin also lumps Reckless Rites together with Toaff’s book. (The article is a 3-way book review.) He essentially accuses Horowitz, Toaff, and one other author of being self-hating Jews: “What is ultimately lacking in such historians is the kind of Jewish self-acceptance that would enable them to feel comfortable with the totality of Jewish experience.” (Just what white historians need with regard to the totality of Western experience!)

      But, like Israel Shamir, Halkin views Horowitz’s book as significantly less groundbreaking than Toaff’s: “Pasque di Sangue is a harmful and irresponsible book in a way that neither Horowitz’s Reckless Rites nor Stanislawski’s A Murder in Lemberg can be said to be.”

      Interestingly, Horowitz also teaches at Toaff’s former home, Bar-Ilan University.

      Based upon an reviewer’s description, it sounds as though De Vier’s book encompasses a broader range of behavior than simply the classic series of alleged ritual child crucifixions associated with Passover.

      I own Arnold Leese’s pamphlet My Irrelevant Defence, being Meditations Inside Gaol and Out on Jewish Ritual Murder (London: Imperial Fascist League, 1938), but for some reason have only read the first nine pages. Nevertheless, it provides a broad overview, and looks like a good starting point for further research.

      The great value of Toaff’s book is that it is by a medieval and renaissance scholar who actually examined the extensive Trent trial records in-depth, and paints the broad picture of medieval Jewish life within which the events took place.

  12. MOB
    Posted April 11, 2012 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    It also appears on Metapedia’s JRM page:

    A woodcut can be found on the first page of Regina Belser’s translation of Hellmut Schramm’s Jewish Ritual Murder; I found her comments regarding her own thinking interesting:

  13. Posted April 11, 2012 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Thanks to Ulf and Mob,

    This, unfortunately, as a symbolic raccourci of our modern Western world, would made a very good book cover for many subjects.

  14. Posted April 12, 2012 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    French decadence is alas a sad truth that we have to contemplate every morning when getting up. It seems that there is no bottom to this abyss.

    As a writer and publisher, I can confirm that people read less and less. This is true for good novels and classical texts, but also for thoughtful and thought provoking writings.

    Rivarol and Present, the two only newspapers worth reading, only print 3000 issues (this with a population of 70.000.000 – a good quarter of it being made of foreign invaders), and we can assume it is the same readership for both papers.

  15. Posted April 12, 2012 at 8:17 am | Permalink

    Here is a comment from a correspondant.

    “The Catholic Church, which long ago beatified Simon of Trent, withdrew the child’s status as a religious martyr in 1965 as part of Pope Paul VI’s Nostra Aetate proclamation at the notoriously philo-Semitic Second Vatican Council.

    It appears that saints can be “de-sainted,” just as “Holocaust deniers” can retroactively lose their academic degrees. As a consequence, Simon no longer appears in the Roman Martyrology, or on any modern Catholic calendar.”

  16. Posted June 2, 2016 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    @ rhondda
    Posted April 6, 2012
    “What was he forced to write?”
    See answer here:

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace