Print this post Print this post

The European Rebirth

Thule as depicted on the map of Olaus Magnus, 1537

740 words

An Italian Marxist, Antonio Gramsci, was the first to understand that the state is not confined to a political apparatus. In fact he established that the political apparatus runs parallel to the so-called civil apparatus. In other words, each political apparatus is reinforced by a civil consensus, the psychological support of the masses.

This psychological support expresses itself through a consensus on the level of culture, world-view, and ethos. In order to exists at all, political power is thus dependent on a cultural power diffused within the masses. On the basis of this analysis Gramsci understood why Marxists could not take over power in bourgeois democracies: they did not have cultural power.

To be precise, it is impossible to overthrow a political apparatus without previously having gained control of cultural power. The assent of the people must be won first: their ideas, ethos, ways of thinking, the value-system, art, education have to be worked on and modified. Only when people feel the need for change as a self-evident necessity will the existing political power, now detached from the general consensus, start crumbling and be overthrown.

Metapolitics can be seen as the revolutionary war fought out on the level of world-views, ways of thinking, and culture.

It is precisely the metapolitical level which is our starting point. We want to take over the laboratories of thinking. Hence our task is to oppose the egalitarian ethos and egalitarian socio-economic thinking with a world-view based on differentiation: this means an ethic and a socio-economic theory which respects the right to be different. We want to create the system of values and attitudes necessary for gaining control of cultural power.

Our strategy is dictated neither by the immediate contingencies of reality nor the superficial upheavals of political life. We are not interested in political factions but in attitudes to life. Commentators will carry on writing irrelevant articles categorizing us under ‘New Right’ but also under ‘left-wing’. Such terms are pathetic and leave us cold, for neither the right nor the left are our concern. It is only basic attitudes to life which people have that interest us. And all those who are aware of the American as well as of the Soviet danger, who realize the absolute necessity of the cultural rebirth of Europe as the harbinger of its political wakening, who feel rooted in a people and a destiny, are our friends and allies, irrespective of their political and ideological views. What motivates us and what we are striving for does cannot be accommodated within the activities of a political party, but – and we insist on this point – solely within the framework of a metapolitical, exclusively cultural project. A programme which sets out once again to make us conscious of our identity through awakening the memory of our future, as it were. In this way we aim to prepare the ground for what is to come.

We have defined our programme as the total rebirth of Europe. We have also established the strategy for realizing this project: metapolitics and cultural war. We still have to consider the basis and material framework within which this programme can be carried out: the Thule Seminar, a New School of European culture.

The tragedy of the contemporary world is the tragedy of disloyalty: the uprooting of every culture, estrangement from our true natures, the atomization of man, the levelling of values, the uniformity of life. A critical and exhaustive engagement with modern knowledge – from philosophy to ethology, from anthropology to sociology, from the natural sciences to history and educational theory—if carried out with the appropriate intellectual rigour and sound empirical methodology, can only contribute to throwing light on the general confusion of the world. It is with such fundamental considerations that the Thule-Seminar is concerned. Open to the intellectual and spiritual life of our age, yet critical of all ideological dogmas, its research is based on a sense of commitment to western culture. The Thule-Seminar is concerned with clarifying the basic questions at the heart of the movement of ideas, with redefining the key cultural concepts and the discovery of new alternatives to the core problems of the age. The Thule-Seminar proclaims a European Europe which must become aware of its identity and its destiny.

Source: Die Europäische Wiedergeburt [The European rebirth] (Grabert, Tübingen, 1982) 82-6, 89.

Online Source:


This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. T.E.L.
    Posted December 10, 2011 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    Dear Greg,

    I would like to point out that original source isn’t Alex Kurtagic’s website ”Wermod & Wermod” as this article can be found on the internet in its original here:
    for many years now and with the original title and short introduction.

    Thank you

  2. Armor
    Posted December 10, 2011 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    “it is impossible to overthrow a political apparatus without previously having gained control of cultural power.”

    Not true. A coup d’état or a putsch may be staged. Newspapers and politicians can be bought.

    “The assent of the people must be won first: their ideas, ethos, ways of thinking, the value-system, art, education have to be worked on and modified.”

    In 1789 France, and in 1917 Russia, the revolutionaries didn’t have popular support. It wasn’t needed. The support of a small activist clique was enough.

    In the 20h century, Jewish activists have gradually taken control of Western governments. They never were able to persuade White people that race replacement is good for us. But their race-replacement agenda is now being enforced anyway.

    “We want to create the system of values and attitudes necessary for gaining control of cultural power.”

    The Jews did create a system of values and attitudes, but their leftist rhetoric is mostly rubbish, incoherent and self-contradictory. It is based on chutzpah and double standards, and keeps changing all the time. The only thing that never changes is the idea that White is bad.

    I think the Jews were able to gain control thanks to their ethnic solidarity and networking. They directly infiltrated the institutions and social movements. The silly leftists were only used as auxiliary troops, maybe to create the illusion that the government’s new policies were backed by popular pressure.

    I don’t think we need to elaborate a system of values and attitudes. We must simply name the Jew and explicitly say that we want to defend the existence of White people. We must appeal to the White ethnic conscience. Our philosophy must consist in asking ourselves what’s good for the Whites.

    It isn’t clear to me what is the role of propaganda. Western governments usually ignore popular opinion. Even so, we are bombarded by media propaganda. I think their main goal is not to change our minds, but to take up all the space and prevent or drown out free speech. Also, they may want to create the impression that there is some conflict between government and the media, even though it is the same kind of phony opposition as between the two major political parties.

    White people who want to defend their existence should simply say the obvious things that we are not allowed to say in the media –that white people have a right to exist and so on. I know we must do more than that, but what I mean is we don’t need to invent a new philosophy.

    Today’s genocidal regime relies on the cooperation of white people. Most of them are not antiwhite at all. A lot of them would naturally have similar opinions to our own. But what’s needed is a public expression of the pro-white point of view, as it seems that collective action is impossible in the absence of preliminary public speech. In Andersen’s tale, everyone knows deep down that the Emperor is naked, but it has to be yelled publicly (as Emma West did) before it becomes publicly recognized. What matters is what the media say more than what people think. But I hope the internet is beginning to make a difference.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace