Print this post Print this post

Jared Taylor on the Prospects for Secession Today

1,532 words

“150 Years After Fort Sumter: Independence Is There For Those With the Will to Take it”, April 12, 2011

150 years ago tonight—at 4:30 a.m. on April 12, 1861—Confederate forces opened fire on Fort Sumter.

My great-great-grandfather, William Boggs, was an engineer who helped prepare the gun emplacements at Fort Moultrie, which delivered the heaviest fire. All my ancestors on both sides of my family were Confederates. There is not a single Yankee in my family tree, so my lineage is about as Southern as it could be. What does any of that mean 146 years after Appomattox?

Americans are famously ignorant of history, and the past is always receding—but for not a few Southerners, The War and its consequences are never far below the surface. William Faulkner famously said: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.” This rings true only for Southerners (except perhaps for a few Mayflower-descended Boston Brahmins). Indeed, some Southerners still dream of an independent nation-state of their own. Since 1994, an organization called the League of the South has tried to prepare for independence, though its leaders—thoughtful and honorable men—concede that that time has not yet come.

Will it ever come? There are enormous obstacles. The South is filling up with Yankees and Mexicans for whom the idea of a Southern nation is meaningless. Blacks are moving back from the North, and for them, a Southern nation is worse than meaningless: it is anathema. Southern nationalists imagine a benign and romantic revival of the Confederacy, with battle flags, chivalry, and conservative Christianity; but for many Americans, there can be no benign revival. They cannot separate the Confederacy from slavery. And any goal with even the slightest, second-hand, undeserved, taint of slavery is at a deep disadvantage.

I am confident that not one person who dreams of an independent South has the slightest desire to reinstitute slavery. But that doesn’t matter. Any Southern sovereignty movement that even mentions Lee and Jackson or hums Dixie is automatically suspect. And what Southern independence movement can there be without Lee, Jackson, and “Dixie”?

It makes no difference that slavery flourished under the Stars and Stripes for far longer than it did under the Stars and Bars. It makes no difference that Lincoln had no use for blacks and wanted them out of the country. The Confederacy and the entire South have been nailed to the cross of slavery—but these obstacles could be overcome by fiercely determined people.

Something more serious holds back Southern nationalism: Its support is limited almost entirely to people who profess a certain kind of politics, whereas national movements must be beyond politics. An independent South would need the support of people who may not be conservative, who may not be suspicious of big government, who may not be Christian, who may not oppose marriage for homosexuals, but who are still devoted to the South. The roots of a Southern nation would have to spread widely and not just sink deep.

Take the admittedly unscientific sample of my sainted mother. Born in 1922, she believed Southerners were different from Yankees, and was thankful to have been born a Southerner. She rose when Dixie was played and looked daggers at anyone who did not. She turned her back on “The Battle Hymn of the Republic”. When Jimmy Carter was elected—after a campaign in which Democratic radio ads throughout the South actually featured Dixie, incredible as that may now sound—she thought it was wonderful finally to have a President who did not speak with an accent.

She lived in Massachusetts for a year, and loved to drive through the New England countryside. She didn’t know what to make of the monuments to the Union dead that are in virtually every town square until she came up with a good, Southern way to think about of them: as monuments to Confederate marksmanship.

And yet, my mother would not be part of today’s Southern nationalism. She was a professional social worker and a Norman Thomas socialist. She was an early champion of women’s liberation, and campaigned for gay rights. She believed in the redemptive power of government, and went to her grave a committed liberal.

My mother loved the South because she grew out of that red dirt, because that was the land that formed her. She was Southern because she was born Southern. The Confederacy was part of her extended family—and whatever a Southern lady does, she loves and defends her family.

But today, how many Southerners feel as she did about the South unless they also are deeply conservative? The cause of the South must be at the political center, not the fringe.

Let me be clear: I am not blaming today’s Southern nationalists for their political opinions, many of which I share. I am pointing out only that the broadly-based Southern patriotism of which my mother was a part is gone. There are not many Southern nationalists today who would march for gay rights or would expand the welfare state.

Fifty years ago was the 100th anniversary of firing on Fort Sumter. In 1961 I was a fourth grader in Richmond, Virginia, and my teacher, Bela Outlaw, was an outspoken Southern patriot. We were never to talk in her class of the “Civil War” but of the “War between the States” because, as she explained, ours had been a battle for independence, not a fight over who sat in the White House. She taught us that secession was in the tradition of the American Revolution—which was secession from England—and that George Washington is on the Great Seal of the Confederacy because our ancestors believed they were acting in his name. She taught us that the 9th and 10th Amendments cannot be read as prohibiting secession, and that our ancestors were legally and morally right.

All my classmates were staunch Confederates. “Yankee” was a term of contempt. The Battle Flag was our symbol of bravery and devotion. That year, I saved up my meager allowance and bought two genuine Confederate $20 bank notes. I thrilled to imagine whose hands might have touched those sacred relics.

Fifty years later, after the enforcement of Brown vs. Board and what can only be called the Second Reconstruction, I suspect today’s Richmond fourth graders are not as Confederate as my class was. I’m certain their teachers are not as Confederate as Bela Outlaw was.

And yet Miss Outlaw was not a conservative. There were rumors that black children might be coming to our all-white school, and she had firm views about that, too. She said she would treat black children exactly as she treated us, and, like it or not, we had better do the same.

I don’t know about my class-mates but I remain sympathetic to secession. I would be glad to see an independent South—or an independent Vermont or Texas or Cascadia. I applauded the disintegration of the Soviet Union, as much because it meant independent homelands as because it signaled the death of Communism. Today, I root for the Chechens against the Russians, the South Sudanese against the Arabs, the Kurds against the Turks, the Flemings against the Walloons, the Quebeckers against Toronto. Men need homelands that are theirs, that commemorate their heritage and ensure its survival.

But when the Czechs and the Slovaks peacefully seceded from each other, it was because millions of people were Czech or Slovak nationalists first, and many different things second. They set aside all other disagreements in the name of nation.

The American South does not now have the same broad-based national fervor, and the few sparks of Southern patriotism that remain are smothered by newcomers who are indifferent or hostile to the South.

Looking back 150 years, I am struck by how remote an irritant the federal government then was. About the only brush with Washington most Americans ever had was buying stamps at the post office. The feds never dreamed of telling you whom you had to hire, what you could put in your food, or how many days off you had to give the help. No American had to account to Washington for every penny he earned, and then hand over a big part of it. Not even Louis XIV or Ivan the Terrible exercised that kind of tyranny. The people of Illinois and Wisconsin would have voted articles of secession before South Carolina did if they had lived in the grip of today’s central government.

And yet, the irony is that today’s pestilential bureaucracy has nothing like the resolve with which Lincoln’s government fought the war. A country that chants mantras about diversity and tolerance has no idea what it even is. It has no identity to impose on people who know who they are, know what they want, and are prepared to fight for it.

The real tragedy is that Southern nationalism crested 150 years too soon. I am convinced that if, today, the people of the South—or of any state—were as determined to secede as my ancestors were in 1860 and 1861, the federal government would not now slaughter them to keep their corpses in the Union.

Independence is there for any group of Americans that is united in its determination to take it.



  1. Spectator
    Posted April 13, 2011 at 3:02 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the informed comments, Mr Taylor.

  2. Barbara
    Posted April 13, 2011 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    I think that if people thought it were possible they would want to secede. If we had a cable news channel to reach people we could change things so fast.

  3. Michael O'Meara
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    This beautifully written piece, by one of the few great men of our generation, addresses the single most important problem facing European-America.

    Jared writes: “A country that chants mantras about diversity and tolerance has no idea what it even is.”

    And it’s not just the country as a whole that has no idea what it is, the overwhelming majority of white Americans have no idea who they are.

    We have become a mass of atomized individuals lacking a sense of collective identity.

    A quick glance at the comment section of any of the now numerous racially-conscious websites reveals a near total absence of common ideas and sentiments.

    Though I favor secession and would like to see the United States break up into several autonomous white republics, I agree with Jared that there can be no such secession until there arises a collective national consciousness willing to fight for it.

    This bleak situation tells me two things about the struggle we’ll have to wage.

    First: We few who retain our identity must fight not simply to preserve our people from the miscegenating government that seeks our destruction. At the same time, it is no less necessary to fight the social, economic, and cultural underpinnings of the American system that make the existing subversions possible. Our struggle, in a word, is not simply for the liberation of the “white nation” (that has, in effect, ceased to exist), it’s also a struggle to overthrow the meaning-denying, identity-negating forms of late modern society (what our less sophisticated comrades see in terms of the Jewish “conspiracy”).

    Second: Given that white community and consciousness have been pulverized by the American system, the single, remaining hope for “redemption” lays in a possible system breakdown. The one thing, in fact, holding together the white/black/red/brown/yellow “enterprise” known as the US is the increasingly dysfunctional central government. And its days seem numbered. Perhaps in the struggle to “redeem” a remnant of the old American nation from the apocalyptic disaster that the system is inadvertently preparing, there will arise a new consciousness and a new identity.

  4. Briton
    Posted April 15, 2011 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    As an avowed separatist I believe secession will occur whether it be from our own hands or from the bumbling hands of the incompetent alien forces who made a disaster out of all we have created. That doesn’t leave us blameless, but it gives us a common enemy to focus our sights on once we begin to defend a piece of land again. That isn’t everything, but it certainly helps. I still believe secession is an occurrence that we will not create, but inherit. It will be the offspring of an international breakdown and we must have an infrastructure in place to fill the vacuum. That will be our greatest chance to save our people. At that point of breaking away (or being broken away collaterally) we will have to make the best of what has been given to us. That is fine. A man, a women, a People can find their identity anywhere. We will finally be forced to stare each other in the face uttering the unspoken question: Are we worth saving? My prediction is that we will answer in the affirmative. That doesn’t guarantee a victory. It simply means we will fight back once this ugly, evil, oppressive system implodes itself. What can guarantee our survival and victory is creating the culture and the network(s) that will persistently give us the foundation from which to push back. We have much work to do. That is, if we are serious.

  5. Armor
    Posted April 17, 2011 at 5:33 am | Permalink

    J.Taylor: “national movements must be beyond politics”

    It is no longer true today. Today, liberalism means replacement of the Whites, even though most left-wing voters still refuse to see that. How come there is no pro-white liberal movement? If there is no such movement, there is no reason the Southern Nationalists should try to make room for their liberal friends in a mostly conservative movement.

    I hope in the near future, the way white people define themselves politically will simply come down to pro-white or anti-white. Former white liberals will switch to the right and maybe they will feel less estranged from the Southern nationalists than today.

    JT: “Independence Is There For Those With the Will to Take it”

    Does he think it is true for the White Nationalist cause too? I think there is no point in gaining independence for a multiracial South at a time when white people are becoming a minority. It seems more crucial to work for racial separation and the right to free-assembly for Whites.

    JT: “I am convinced that if, today, the people of the South-or of any state-were as determined to secede as my ancestors were in 1860 and 1861, the federal government would not now slaughter them to keep their corpses in the Union.”

    I think he’s right. In the discussion about Covington’s books, it is assumed that the government will nuke the NorthWest if it is the only way to prevent secession. If so, how come the government has not even shut down the internet? It makes more and more people aware of the Jewish problem. As it slowly dawns on white people that the government is deliberately destroying them, I think the government will lose their support and get weaker. It will become politically difficult to go aggressively after the White resistance.

    JT: “A country that chants mantras about diversity and tolerance has no idea what it even is. It has no identity to impose on people who know who they are, know what they want, and are prepared to fight for it.”

    The government has no alternative identity to give the Southerners. Its almost official objective is to dispossess the Whites and make them into a dwindling minority. Even so, most white people are still more wary of White Nationalism and Southern Nationalism than of our genocidal elites. This is unbelievable! But I think it’s going to change soon.

  6. Marty Feinstein
    Posted April 18, 2011 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    The Confederacy and the entire South have been nailed to the cross of slavery

    As Germany to The Holocaust. Which is the point isn’t it? We accused the Jews of killing Christ, now they accuse us of the modern version. Which at this point in time means denying that George Burns (real name: Nathan Birnbaum) and Morgan Freeman are gods.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace