- Counter-Currents - https://counter-currents.com -

Toward a White Transhumanism of Power

Ahhnold1,733 words

French translation here [1]

Judaism — A Transhumanistic Religion of Power

How Judaism is like getting jumped into a gang:

The ritual of getting jumped into a gang goes like this: the group beats the crap out of you, then if they decide you took it well, then they are all your “gang brothers” or whatever. They’re your best friends, and I would imagine a new gang member is “showered” with congratulations.

A Jewish baby boy also goes through the ritual of Punishment/Pain at birth, and then “showered with gifts” at 13 years old. They are made to understand that “membership has its privileges.” Deep in the psyche there is a memory of the extremely painful cutting. This lets them know “who’s the boss.”

Anybody who says babies don’t feel that, and/or they don’t remember it, is deluded. It’s like saying the fish doesn’t feel the hook. It’s a typical “break you down, build you back up,” cycle, not unlike military basic training.

There is a broad concept called “trans-humanism.” I believe the reason that Jewry has surpassed Christendom in global power, is because Jewry has encouraged trans-humanist enhancements in its members, while Christian ministers have feared competition for their collection plates.

What is Transhumanism?

From Wikipedia [2]:

Transhumanism is an international intellectual and cultural movement supporting the use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical characteristics and capacities. The movement regards aspects of the human condition, such as disability, suffering, disease, aging, and involuntary death as unnecessary and undesirable. Transhumanists look to biotechnologies and other emerging technologies for these purposes. Dangers, as well as benefits, are also of concern to the transhumanist movement.

The term “transhumanism” is symbolized by H+ or h+ and is often used as a synonym for “human enhancement”. Although the first known use of the term dates from 1957, the contemporary meaning is a product of the 1980s when futurists in the United States began to organize what has since grown into the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist thinkers predict that human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves into beings with such greatly expanded abilities as to merit the label “posthuman.” Transhumanism is therefore sometimes referred to as “posthumanism” or a form of transformational activism influenced by posthumanist ideals.

The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives. Transhumanism has been described by one critic, Francis Fukuyama, as the world’s most dangerous idea, while one proponent, Ronald Bailey, counters that it is the “movement that epitomizes the most daring, courageous, imaginative, and idealistic aspirations of humanity.”

Arno Breker's "Bereitschaft" ("Readiness")

A very familiar example of trans-humanism is bodybuilding, or physical conditioning in general. This of course was eventually permitted by Christianity, and you had the “muscular Christians.”

My own father was a prime example. He was a YMCA director and all-around athlete, from gymnastics to soccer to skiing to swimming.

However, there was an implicit sense that there were “normal methods” of self-improvement, like the weight room, and then there were the methods of “the weirdos,” the “non-Western” styles of self-improvement, such as the housewives in the leotards doing yoga.

Power is Good, Weakness is Evil

Eventually I became so enamored of the possibility of self improvement that I lost all taboos. Anything that made me more powerful, I decided, was good.

For years I listened to Jay Hughes’ “Change Surfer Radio,” and didn’t realize to what degree I myself was a transhumanist. I dismissed the term as “for weirdos” because it sounded too much like “transsexual.” When Jay Hughes talked about the Terminator movies as extreme examples of transhumanism, it suddenly made sense.

Hughes also talked about “breeding 160 IQ perfect Nordics, and this might not be a good thing for a radically democratic society. Rich people might breed themselves into Aryan overlords.”

Don’t laugh — we already have the technology. All it takes is for someone who isn’t held back by the “implicit Christian minister” wagging his index finger, saying, “that’s too weird.”

The whole aspect of Christianity that says, “Don’t go there,” is why the Middle Ages was “1,000 years without a bath.” Bathing was considered “ungodly,” i.e., “transhumanist.” It was paganistic, unnecessary self-improvement for the pious.

If there is a trigger in your brain that says, “Nah, that’s too weird.” That’s the same impulse that told us not to take a bath for 1,000 years. Dissassemble that implanted, alien circuit and throw it away.

Turn on a new circuit, one that’s already in your brain. It’s the one that says, “anything that gives me power, is good.”

The dominance of the current order depends on “implicit Christianity” that’s been implanted in us since Sunday school. It’s that in you which shrinks from the Will to Power, from a fanatic, obsessive striving for dominance.

If words like “power, fanatic, obsessive, dominance” bother you, that’s the implicit Christian minister in the back of your head. Turn him off. Imagine in your mind that he’s wagging his finger at you. Laugh at him, and then take him like a rag doll and throw him out of your brain.

In his place, put Arnold Schwarzenegger saying in his Austrian accent, “That which makes me more powerful, is good. That which weakens me, is bad.”

Learn from the Enemy

I figured this out from studying the enemy. Leftist Jews have taken great advantage of this “implicit Christian” impulse, even while practicing transhumanism and a religion of power themselves. Their power lies in controlling us.

This doesn’t mean someone like Tim Wise doesn’t “believe” in what he preaches. He has to. To hypnotize someone, you have to believe it yourself. He’s able to believe in something, that he knows is a “beneficial fraud,” or a “noble lie.”

Let us ask what Tim Wise thinks is “bad.” From the paragraph below we see “dominance” on the part of Whites is his “ultimate evil.” Good whites will “roll over and show their belly.” Good Jews do the opposite, of course.

Good (Christian) whites avoid that “weird transhumanism” stuff. Good (Christian) whites don’t want to “dominate” because we’re all equal now. Even secular liberal types claim that seeking dominance just “perpetuates the cycle of dominance.” Well, duh. It’s not going away. Anybody who voluntary gives up striving for dominance is going to end up a slave . . . literally. Even if they are able to live all peaceful and hippie now in the woods of Oregon, if we get an ANC style colored government in the US, there will be as much peace for them as there is for the Whites of the former Rhodesia.

If Rhodesia/Zimbabwe is a bad outcome, then anything that leads to that is bad, or perhaps downright evil. Volunteering to submit is EVIL. It’s the wrong decision, in every way. The Christian minister, or the Tim Wise, telling you to “give up your power,” is your executioner.

So what is good? Let’s ask Arnold again:

“That which makes me more powerful, is good. That which weakens me, is bad.”

I watch Jews. I saw how they live in Boston. They are really into everything that Christians were discouraged from doing. Self-enhancement, selfishness, collective-mindedness. Sure they are a bunch of neurotics, but if you laugh at Woody Allen, you’re missing the Jew who’s taken over your culture. I’m sure as hell not laughing.

We can learn from the enemy, what ideals to have, by seeing what they fear. Tim Wise gave away the store when he wrote the below paragraph, my comments in parentheses:

http://www.laprogressive.com/rankism/obama-black-voters-and-the-myth-of-reverse-racism/ [3]

But for members of groups that have not been subordinated to “think with their skin” or their racial identity is quite a bit different, and more problematic. For dominant group members to engage in racial bonding only makes sense as a way to maintain dominance [to maintain a sane society where 14 year old white girls don’t get pregnant or infected with HIV from black males]. It can’t be about “getting a piece of the pie,” since such persons already have access to it, and pieces galore; rather, it has to be about preventing others from getting their [pieces of white flesh], from taking parts of the pie to which the dominant group had come to feel entitled (of course. We own ourselves as a Racial Family. No other races may claim a piece of us) It is not to seek a place at the table, but to seek to secure the table you already have from the intrusion of others [just as we prevent intrusion into our own homes, so we prevent intrusion into our gene pool and the piece of the Planet Earth our race needs to survive]. White bonding, in other words, amounts to racism because it is redundant: it amounts to having those who are already largely in control, secure that control in perpetuity. It results in the maintenance of racial inequity [Blaming us for inequalities in natural endownment], unequal opportunity and massive disparities in access and life chances [Welcome to Planet Earth]. Black and brown bonding, on the other hand, is about gaining access [and sustaining Jewish Dominance as the gate-openers for the blacks and browns and rulers over whites], securing a spot, and collectively lifting up members of subordinated communities to a place where they can compete as equals with those who have always been in charge [can they compete as equals if they aren’t equals?]. There is nothing supremacist or racist about that at all, unless one presumes that–as Jesse Jackson and others have long said–there is no fundamental difference between a “Welcome” mat and a “No Trespassing” sign [synagogues and Jewish yeshiva schools display the latter].

Weakness . . . in us . . . is evil. Weakness leads to Zimbabwe. It leads to Nushawn Williams infecting a dozen white teenaged girls with AIDS and impregnating 6 of them, and of course this has happened a million times over since 1997.

To overcome our implanted programming, our “implicit Christianity,” we have to kill the Christian minister in our subconscious, and replace him with a religion of power.

The Jewish rabbi in the back of the head of every Jew is always saying, “Is it good for the Jews?”

We need a new superego, a new divine-consciousness, that says Yes to power and dominance, rather than shrinking from it like a coward. We must end the vestigial “thousand years without a bath” thinking and cultivate a transhumanist religion of power.

TOQ Online, February 25, 2010